Description
Solution
Question 4
High performance work practices (HPWPs) are people management techniques through which employee motivation, productivity and long-term organisational success will be achieved (Mohd Nasurdin et al., 2020). Selective hiring, ongoing skills training and decentralised decision making are key practices under these techniques. Across a number of sectors, it is evident that HPWPs enhance organisational resilience and innovation, as well as employee retention. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of HPWPs is influenced by cultural and resource-based constraints which are not industry specific. This is since there are varying demands and expectations in all sectors and business environment. The best practice is hence to consider the evaluation of all existing approaches for appropriate recommendations.
Role in Boosting Productivity and Innovation
HPWPs have substantially improved employee productivity and spurs innovation, especially in knowledge-intensive sectors. Bhatti et al. (2020), for example, discovered that an increase of 20 percent in productivity was obtained by HPWPs like performance-based incentives and collaborative decisions in technology firms. With HPWPs, these companies get many benefits because they inspire such creativity and autonomy in employees, which is particularly important for problem solving and innovation. Similarly, Kutieshat & Farmanesh (2022) noted that in knowledge-based industries, HPWPs increased creativity by creating a more engaged and experienced workforce capable of handling demanding tasks. However, the effectiveness of HPWP’s in increasing productivity is dependent on the industry in question. In a manufacturing context, for instance, Imran & Atiya (2020) find that the effects of HPWPs on innovation and productivity are limited. Likewise, in industries with rigid operational processes, techniques like employee empowerment or extensive training may not make much of a difference. Such sector-specific variation indicates that HPWPs can bring substantial productivity and innovation benefits, but only if their implementation is tailored towards firms’ areas of core functions and operations dynamics. Adopting these practices may be beneficial in this way as organisations adapt these practices to the particular drivers of productivity in a sector so that the benefits gained through HPWPs can be maximised.
Strengthening Employee Engagement and Retention
Sustaining organisational stability through HWPs plays an important role through engagement and retention of employees. Isimoya et al (2020) reported that organisational implementation of HPWPs had increases in engagement and retention by up to 15%, when such organised career development programme was coupled with individual performance recognition. This is because in such environments, employees were satisfied with their job, committed and they felt a sense of belonging and recognised effort. On the other hand, HPWPs have helped reduce burnout and increase retention rates in healthcare sector though team empowerment and skill development (Memon et al., 2020). Yet the retention benefits of HPWPs may differ among industries with higher turnover, such as retail where job tenures are generally short. While HPWPs offer flexible scheduling and performance-based incentives to improve engagement in retail settings, transient nature of the sector limits its overall long-term effects (Datta et al., 2021). For this reason, HPWPs can play a major part in retention for many industries, even though different industries might require alternative approaches to secure employees for the long-term in sectors characterised with temporary work structures. Overall, HPWPs have strong potential for engagement and retention, but adaptation to context and sector specific sources of support is essential for impact in a range of contexts and sectors.
Increasing Operational Efficiency in Resource-Intensive Industries
In industries where processes generally are resource intensive, HPWPs can contribute to operational efficiency and resulting waste reduction. For example,…..
Please click the following icon to access this project in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD Level 5 Oakwood 5HR03 Reward for performance and contribution
(Solution) CIPS PIN NUPCO Formal Commercial Negotiation Plan
- For the current integrated modules assignment, a formal negotiation plan has been developed appropriate for the Procurement and Supply Management (PS&M) focusing on organisation operations.
- In this assessment, the National Unified Procurement Company (NUPCO) a leader in Saudi Arabia procurement, logistics and supply chain management for pharmaceutical, medical devices and supplies for government hospitals in Saudi Arabia (KSA).
- Further, the Ultrasound Machines procurement category has been identified in this report. By successfully reflecting on the content from driving value through procurement and supply, managing expenditures, developing contracts, sourcing essentials, negotiation in procurement and supply, relevant insights of the negotiation plan has been provided. Further, in this integrative assessment, the various tools applied include STEEPLE, Porter’s 5 Forces, SWOT analysis and Mendelow Matrix Stakeholders have been used to develop a successful negotiation strategy.
- The importance of this has been informed by the fact that NUPCO being a procurement organisation prioritise on attaining cost spending efficiencies and improvement of the healthcare services providers to government hospitals.
- This is with the skills, concessions, alternatives in the negotiation prioritised identified in this integrative assessment.
(Solution) 7CO03 Learning Plan own approaches to decision-making on complex issues, taking ownership to remedy mistakes
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Sourcing Essentials- PSE
- In this report, the area of focus is on different sourcing approaches which can be used in procurement and supply management (PS&M) in contemporary business environment. This is through the focus of ROSHN organisation in Design Building category of spend.
- To achieve the intended aim of this report, data has been sourced from the organisation internal documents, different CIPS modules and models (Mendelow, STEEPLE and Kraljic). The key findings include ROSHN prefeed approach being multiple sourcing owing to the high-level of market competitiveness. This is with sole and single approaches preferred when only one supplier is being engaged owing to differences in organisation needs.
- Also, the findings evidence that single sourcing prevail in an event many suppliers are available, but an organisation decides to go for one. Another finding in this report is that dual sourcing is used when different methods/options for sourcing are embraced and put in place.
- Finally, through the application of supplier appraisal tool, focusing on the Design Building spend area, an evaluation has been put into account. The result from the appraisal using Carter’s 10C’s evidence organisation success to achieve value for money outcomes and improved market development.
- Internal and external analysis to identify most appropriate sourcing strategy
- Broad sourcing appraisal strategy need to be introduced
- Focus on managing successful sourcing strategy as part of organisation policy and practices
- Involve more stakeholders as part of their operations for success in sourcing strategy
- Pursuing capacity development initiatives for PS&M understanding of relevance of different PS&M