Description
Solution
Pricing Strategy of the Supplier
Knowledge of the suppliers’ pricing structure helps the organization to plan for the costs in advance and even look for better deals. The analysis here is carried out with respect to supplier cost structure, supplier market position and developments in prices.
Supply Market Analysis
Supply market analysis evaluates the supplier market in terms of key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. It looked at the general trends, competitors, availability of suppliers and complied with the regulatory measures. In the case of ROSHN, this might imply ascertaining if other suppliers provide similar products or if there are supply chain adverse effects related to certain suppliers.
Porter’s Five Forces
Figure 4: Porter’s Model
Source:
Porter’s Five Forces is a tactical tool used to draw patterns of competitive forces in the market. Its five elements are as shown in figure 4 as highlighted by (Planium Pro (2021):
Threat of New Entrants: The threat posed by new entrants that make the market competitive to existing players and this may lead to adjustments in the prices to fit the market trends.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The power suppliers have to control price, terms and conditions, and availability of a product or a service.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: The bargaining power that the organisation has that it can negotiate with the suppliers for better terms.
Threat of Substitutes: There being other similar product that could do the same job and could be used by the customers instead.
Competitive Rivalry: How intense competition is within existing suppliers that affect pricing and overall quality of services supplied.
PESTLED Analysis
The PESTLED model helps analyse external factors affecting the negotiation environment as evidenced by CIPS (2024). Elements include:
Source: CIPS (2024)
Factor | Description |
Political | Regulations and policies that could impact sourcing. |
Economic | Economic conditions influencing supplier pricing. |
Social | Societal expectations for ethical sourcing and sustainability. |
Technological | Advancements affecting production and supply chains. |
Legal | Compliance requirements that suppliers must meet. |
Environmental | The supplier’s sustainability practices. |
Demographic | Workforce diversity and inclusive practices. |
Kraljic Matrix
The Kraljic Matrix categorizes products or services based on supply risk and profit impact as shown in figure 5:
Source: CIPS Module Notes
Strategic: High impact, high risk—requires a long-term partnership with a reliable supplier.
Leverage: High impact, low risk—where the organisation can exert more control.
Bottleneck: Low impact, high risk—requires strategies to mitigate supply risk.
Non-Critical: Low impact, low risk—where price is the main consideration.
For ROSHN, sourcing a supplier for sustainable materials may fall into the Strategic quadrant, necessitating careful selection and a strong relationship.
Supplier Preferencing
Figure 4:Supplier Referencing Matrix
This model determines the extent to which suppliers’ perceptions of their clients are positive, according to value and interaction. Classification of the groups are: Core which has high value and is highly engaged, Development which is highly engaged but low value, Exploitable is highly valuable and less engaged and Nuisance is low value and less engaged (Marshaine and Marshaine, 2024). As for ROSHN, it simply may indicate what exact position within this value chain the company occupies and what corresponding strategy should be chosen for negotiations.
SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats): It is useful when the organisation casts a look on its internal environment in terms of strength and weaknesses and the external environment in terms of opportunities and threats to enable it devise a good negotiation strategy (see table 2).
Source:
SWOT Analysis | Description |
Strengths | Internal resources or capabilities that can be leveraged in negotiation, e.g., strong brand reputation, skilled team. |
Weaknesses | Internal limitations that may impact negotiation, e.g., limited budget, lack of specific expertise. |
Opportunities | External factors that could be advantageous, e.g., market growth, potential partnerships. |
Threats | External challenges that could impact outcomes, e.g., strong competitors, economic |
Supplier Analysis
For the collected data, it was gathered through the methods of website analysis, chairperson statement analysis, and Key Account Management (KAM) to get an in-depth understanding of the supplier’s objectives and strategies to follow for ROSHN.
Therefore, the Preparation stage involves three principal tasks: gathering internal data, market analysis, and supplier understanding is key to offering negotiator tactical advantages. Strategists such as Mendelow’s Matrix, Porter’s Five Forces, PESTLED, Kraljic Matrix, Supplier Preferencing and SWOT analysis assist ROSHN to ensure it set goals and objectives in the right perspective with the right projection of challenges as well as strategize the best defensive orantageous position during negotiation. In this manner, ROSHN guarantees that through proper preparation, it will be able to negotiate the kind of terms it wants into the contracts more or less and establish long term suppliers.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 7C002 Question 1 (AC1.1)
(Solution) CIPD One analysis tool and analysis method Technivara might apply to recognise and diagnose issues, challenges, and opportunities
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC Sourcing Essentials PSE
- For the current report, the sourcing approaches identified and in-depth explained are informed by the ADNOC chemicals sourcing.
- In tandem with the different spend categories, different sourcing approaches for the spend have been applied with a supplier appraisal generated at the end.
- Through an in-depth analysis, sourcing strategies evaluating in areas of multiple, single, dual and sole. For procuring the chemicals, multiple sourcing is the best practice due to the procurement process characteristic.
- As evidenced from Kraljic analysis matrix, suppliers relations are noted with chemicals procurement being a leverage category.
- The Carter’s 10Cs model is applicable to pursue suppliers appraisal for chemicals sourcing supplier appraisal.
(Solution) 70S05 Question 2 (AC 2.3) Fitter Threads Ltd managers relocating to Bangladesh, India and Vietnam
(Solution) Sourcing essentials (PSE) Saudi Downtown Company (SDC) Information Technology (IT) systems
- To select best sourcing approach informed by the characteristics of their spend categories
- Ensure various legislations and policies are initiated to aid use of technologies and innovation in their sourcing process
- Implement a fully streamlined PS&M strategy with entire stakeholders interests prioritised
- Improve information flow and supporting their sourcing strategy by leverage on different approaches (RFQ, RFP and e-Auction) integrated to product lifecycle