Description
Solution
Pricing Strategy of the Supplier
Knowledge of the suppliers’ pricing structure helps the organization to plan for the costs in advance and even look for better deals. The analysis here is carried out with respect to supplier cost structure, supplier market position and developments in prices.
Supply Market Analysis
Supply market analysis evaluates the supplier market in terms of key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. It looked at the general trends, competitors, availability of suppliers and complied with the regulatory measures. In the case of ROSHN, this might imply ascertaining if other suppliers provide similar products or if there are supply chain adverse effects related to certain suppliers.
Porter’s Five Forces
Figure 4: Porter’s Model
Source:
Porter’s Five Forces is a tactical tool used to draw patterns of competitive forces in the market. Its five elements are as shown in figure 4 as highlighted by (Planium Pro (2021):
Threat of New Entrants: The threat posed by new entrants that make the market competitive to existing players and this may lead to adjustments in the prices to fit the market trends.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The power suppliers have to control price, terms and conditions, and availability of a product or a service.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: The bargaining power that the organisation has that it can negotiate with the suppliers for better terms.
Threat of Substitutes: There being other similar product that could do the same job and could be used by the customers instead.
Competitive Rivalry: How intense competition is within existing suppliers that affect pricing and overall quality of services supplied.
PESTLED Analysis
The PESTLED model helps analyse external factors affecting the negotiation environment as evidenced by CIPS (2024). Elements include:
Source: CIPS (2024)
Factor | Description |
Political | Regulations and policies that could impact sourcing. |
Economic | Economic conditions influencing supplier pricing. |
Social | Societal expectations for ethical sourcing and sustainability. |
Technological | Advancements affecting production and supply chains. |
Legal | Compliance requirements that suppliers must meet. |
Environmental | The supplier’s sustainability practices. |
Demographic | Workforce diversity and inclusive practices. |
Kraljic Matrix
The Kraljic Matrix categorizes products or services based on supply risk and profit impact as shown in figure 5:
Source: CIPS Module Notes
Strategic: High impact, high risk—requires a long-term partnership with a reliable supplier.
Leverage: High impact, low risk—where the organisation can exert more control.
Bottleneck: Low impact, high risk—requires strategies to mitigate supply risk.
Non-Critical: Low impact, low risk—where price is the main consideration.
For ROSHN, sourcing a supplier for sustainable materials may fall into the Strategic quadrant, necessitating careful selection and a strong relationship.
Supplier Preferencing
Figure 4:Supplier Referencing Matrix
This model determines the extent to which suppliers’ perceptions of their clients are positive, according to value and interaction. Classification of the groups are: Core which has high value and is highly engaged, Development which is highly engaged but low value, Exploitable is highly valuable and less engaged and Nuisance is low value and less engaged (Marshaine and Marshaine, 2024). As for ROSHN, it simply may indicate what exact position within this value chain the company occupies and what corresponding strategy should be chosen for negotiations.
SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats): It is useful when the organisation casts a look on its internal environment in terms of strength and weaknesses and the external environment in terms of opportunities and threats to enable it devise a good negotiation strategy (see table 2).
Source:
SWOT Analysis | Description |
Strengths | Internal resources or capabilities that can be leveraged in negotiation, e.g., strong brand reputation, skilled team. |
Weaknesses | Internal limitations that may impact negotiation, e.g., limited budget, lack of specific expertise. |
Opportunities | External factors that could be advantageous, e.g., market growth, potential partnerships. |
Threats | External challenges that could impact outcomes, e.g., strong competitors, economic |
Supplier Analysis
For the collected data, it was gathered through the methods of website analysis, chairperson statement analysis, and Key Account Management (KAM) to get an in-depth understanding of the supplier’s objectives and strategies to follow for ROSHN.
Therefore, the Preparation stage involves three principal tasks: gathering internal data, market analysis, and supplier understanding is key to offering negotiator tactical advantages. Strategists such as Mendelow’s Matrix, Porter’s Five Forces, PESTLED, Kraljic Matrix, Supplier Preferencing and SWOT analysis assist ROSHN to ensure it set goals and objectives in the right perspective with the right projection of challenges as well as strategize the best defensive orantageous position during negotiation. In this manner, ROSHN guarantees that through proper preparation, it will be able to negotiate the kind of terms it wants into the contracts more or less and establish long term suppliers.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD Level 5 5HR03- Reward for Performance and Contribution
(Solution) Question 2- How Sunmark Bank’s Organisational Values and Culture Hampered its Growth
(Solution) 5CO03 human and business benefits of people feeling included, valued, and fairly treated
Solution) 7C002 Question 10 (AC3.2) Evidence for Great Resignation
(Solution) CIPD Oakwood International 5CO01 Assessment ID / CIPD_5CO01_24_01
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.