Solution

Table of Contents

Task One- Written Response. 2

1.1:  Three key factors to consider in preparation for group-based learning and development activities. 2

1.2 Explanation of two principles for selecting learning resources and Materials. 3

2.1 Facilitating Group Learning. 4

The Concept of Facilitation. 4

Locus of Control 4

Power Dynamics. 5

Validity of Resources. 5

2.2 Three learning facilitation methods or techniques. 5

Icebreakers and Warm-ups. 6

Facilitating Learner Activities and Discussions. 6

Role Play. 6

2.3 Discussion of two techniques for monitoring the effectiveness of learning activities during facilitation and two real-time adjustments  7

Monitoring Learning Effectiveness. 7

Informal Questioning. 7

Observation. 7

Enabling Learners through Effective Real-Time Adjustments 8

3.1 The concept of ‘transfer of learning’ 8

Benefits of Ensuring Learning Transfer. 9

3.3 Line Managers. 11

Supporting Transfer through Goal Setting. 11

Supporting Transfer through Coaching. 12

Supporting Manager-Led Learning Transfer. 12

Task Two- Facilitating Face-to-Face L&D. 13

References. 14

Task One- Written Response

1.1:  Three key factors to consider in preparation for group-based learning and development activities.

As put across by the Indeed Editorial Team (2022), the core of making any impactful learning experience, at a group level, is planning. This is particularly for the case study organisation which have L&D function centralised and offering learning materials for use within the broader organisation. On this note, this response shall consider three factors that would be critical to address at the planning stage for such activities. These are applicable for the L&D specialists who are involved in facilitating the L&D programs.

Using approaches based on adult learning theory: Pre-work is particularly useful for adult learners, putting into action some of the methods of adult learning theory into practice. According to Stewart (2021) getting participants to complete a brief yet pertinent activity before the session even begins can significantly help participants to relate the new information being provided to them about the connection to their life and their work. In this case, if training is about strategies of time management, then the pre-work could include asking learners to track how they currently spend their days. They would then reflect on whether their time allocation aligns with priorities (Auld, 2019). Coming to the session with this inner reflection completed engages the prior knowledge and experience adult learners tend to learn best from. It also primes them to immediately participate and extract value from the new material.

Ensuring availability of physical and technical equipment and technology: Any group learning session using technology requires a critical consideration that all the equipment being used is fully functional. According to Criollo-C et al. (2021), having a comprehensive equipment checklist oversees this process. For a new software tutorial, it would list all the computers and projectors that would be required along with the cables etc. Testing is conducted one month, one week and one day in advance. This identifies any faulty leads or missing dongles. Having replacement projection bulbs and extra laptops on hand prevents problems. According to Ediyani et al. (2020) if the projector unexpectedly goes out, the training can continue seamlessly. Such thorough preparation gives facilitators peace of mind and spares learners frustration over technical issues. Overall, it guarantees smooth sailing for engaging with the core material.

Own sufficiency of L&D/facilitation skills and experience: Facilitation skills have a profound impact on how much participants gain from a training session (CIPD, 2022). Going into a new topic requiring skills one has not fully honed could undermine learner outcomes. For a course on coaching techniques, the facilitator aims to strengthen their own expertise through co-facilitation and practice sessions. They arrange to co-lead with an experienced colleague, observing techniques like questioning, involving shy learners and addressing concerns. According to Garavan et al. (2020), the feedback leads to emphasised nods, varied vocal tones and situational examples to boost understanding. The facilitator also runs trial segments, making timings and transitions smoother. Developing mastery ensures confident delivery that enables learners.

 1.2 Explanation of two principles for selecting learning resources and Materials

The choice of resources to use to support the learning activities is essential in the actualization of effective results. According to Bušljeta (2013), principles of accessibility and differentiated use base the selection of materials on how to bring out the most from the options available. Procedures emphasising the varying needs of learners ensure the exploitation of the resources in a manner that brings out the most from the learning situation. For example, in the case organisation, the available learning materials must be well developed. This is with these resources put together for the learners easier access as part of their learning.

This in turn means accessibility is the key to full participation. All learners have to be guaranteed access to content, regardless of ability. Examples include multiple formats, enabling accessible content options such as audio or large print/digital versions for those with visual or mobility impairments. Colour contrast and font sizes large enough for low vision are key. Audio descriptions allow visually impaired learners to understand visuals like diagrams through headphones. Captions make video content accessible to the deaf community. As evidenced in Govender and Adegbite (2022) resources featuring exclusive text may exclude some learners altogether. Ensuring accessibility for all maintains an inclusive environment where no one is disadvantaged.

Apart from accessibility, differentiated use of resources enables the accommodation of individual needs as recorded in learner profiles. For example, having both online and paper handouts does respect different study preferences. Some learners work more effectively if interleaved support, either in the form of polls or discussion forums, is available to underpin their learning. According to Al Mamun et al. (2020), the process followed in breaking up content into modules allows completion at one’s pace. Translations or the possibility of using the first language are given for multicultural learner groups to enhance understanding. This would especially be true where it involved guidance on how to maximize such learning utility. Diverse learners differ in choice and application of materials, thereby ensuring maximum engagement and retention capability.

2.1 Facilitating Group Learning

The Concept of Facilitation

According to Mind Tools Content Team (2023), effective facilitation requires a nuanced understanding of group dynamics and processes. The facilitator assumes the role of coordinator and guide rather than solely an instructor imparting knowledge. They coordinate a collaborative process aimed at achieving predefined learning objectives. This involves deliberately circulating among learners to foster equitable participation, discussion and knowledge sharing between all group members. The good facilitator, however, fosters the co-construction of meanings by building on one another’s contributions (Müller & Mildenberger, 2021). Such a facilitator moderates consensus-building dialogues with smoothness, asks thoughtful questions, and provides relevant resources. This will eventually empower the learners to drive the discussion, problem-solve together, and create a shared understanding of the subject under discussion at the end.

Locus of Control

In contrast to holding tight control over any one process of a group, an effective facilitator adopts a mindset of empowering learners by placing the locus of control centrally with participants. They don’t dominate but guide the discussion from the sidelines. Interventions are carefully made in terms of supporting but not directing (Mind Tools Content Team, 2023). This allows learners autonomy to determine the pace and direction of dialogues. Learners are invited to consider themselves as colleagues working together towards common objectives while the facilitator guarantees that all voices have a say on equal terms. No single opinion is favored over others. In this manner, one develops an ownership feeling in regard to knowledge under construction while being assisted by the impartial facilitator in meaningfully deepening an understanding (Kohnke & Moorhouse, 2022).

A facilitator has an important role in maintaining standards for high productivity levels, non-bias collaboration. There are many things to be considered consciously. Two of the most striking aspects could be power dynamics and representation in learning material and facilitation methods.

Power Dynamics

There needs to be sensitivity toward the imbalance of power in facilitator-learner relationships (Sailer et al., 2021). The facilitator avoids being bossy by considering each participant equal, with their ideas worth something. They need to be sensitive to vocal learners who talk over others who might be less outgoing and take steps to get the less confident involved. Facilitators create an environment of inclusiveness and attentiveness to solve problems associated with hierarchies in the group.

Validity of Resources

Facilitators have a responsibility to vet resources for validity and probable bias prior to use (Gonçalves et al., 2022). All materials presented shall be factually correct, representative either in terms of diversity or perspectives. Facilitators need to avoid single perspectives that might have dominant influence on the learners. A balance of different credible sources in terms of resources goes a long way in ensuring the ethical facilitation of learning content.

2.2 Three learning facilitation methods or techniques

Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full