(Solution) New 5HR01 (AC3.3) Advise on the importance of handling grievances effectively
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
| (AC3.3) Advise on the importance of handling grievances effectively.
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 400 words |
| Good grievance handling practices ensure that the place of work remains a positive one, free from unnecessary conflicts. Quick and fair responses to employee grievances make them feel heard and valued, hence boosting their morale and job satisfaction. Effective grievance management will generally lead to increased trust between employees and management, which decreases the chance of allowing disputes to escalate into serious conflicts. According to ACAS (2020), a well-structured grievance procedure establishes clear transparency and ensures consistency in decision-making. In addition, effective grievance resolution may also increase productivity, as workers will not be distracted by problems in the workplace that are not resolved. Organizations that take care of grievance handling have reduced staff turnover and a more focused workforce.
Impact of Not Handling Grievances Effectively One of the most critical risks to failing at grievance handling is the damage to employer reputation. Employees will feel ignored or mishandled if they think their concerns are not being listened to. This will instigate a culture of toxicity at work, resulting in dissatisfaction and causing negative word-of-mouth. It may further affect the attraction and retention of top talent in the company because prospective employees will shun companies with poor grievance management systems. Public litigation or disputes over complaints will only worsen an organisation’s reputation, and it then becomes very hard to maintain a positive employer brand. The other great consequence of not managing grievances properly is the costs incurred from industrial tribunals and compensation claims. When the grievances are not managed properly, employees will tend to take their grievances to higher external bodies and even employment tribunals, which involve enormous costs in terms of legal disputes. Consulthr (2023) justifies that the tribunal claim for unfair treatment, discrimination, or wrongful dismissal may result in a huge payout on compensation costs. Moreover, unresolved grievances can lead to higher absenteeism and lower productivity, impacting overall business performance Best Practices for Managing Grievances Preventing grievances requires clear, accessible, and consistently applied grievance policies. There should be training provided for managers on handling complaints in an objective, empathetic, and confidential manner. A culture of openness and support will go a long way toward bringing out into the open many of the problems before they can fester and become formal grievances. According to Sarma (2019), a grievance can be reduced to a great extent if the organization is proactive in addressing workplace conflicts through regular employee check-ins and the availability of multiple reporting channels. A well-handled grievance process eventually strengthens employee trust and organizational stability. |
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.