(Solution) New 5HR01 (AC3.3) Advise on the importance of handling grievances effectively
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
| (AC3.3) Advise on the importance of handling grievances effectively.
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 400 words |
| Good grievance handling practices ensure that the place of work remains a positive one, free from unnecessary conflicts. Quick and fair responses to employee grievances make them feel heard and valued, hence boosting their morale and job satisfaction. Effective grievance management will generally lead to increased trust between employees and management, which decreases the chance of allowing disputes to escalate into serious conflicts. According to ACAS (2020), a well-structured grievance procedure establishes clear transparency and ensures consistency in decision-making. In addition, effective grievance resolution may also increase productivity, as workers will not be distracted by problems in the workplace that are not resolved. Organizations that take care of grievance handling have reduced staff turnover and a more focused workforce.
Impact of Not Handling Grievances Effectively One of the most critical risks to failing at grievance handling is the damage to employer reputation. Employees will feel ignored or mishandled if they think their concerns are not being listened to. This will instigate a culture of toxicity at work, resulting in dissatisfaction and causing negative word-of-mouth. It may further affect the attraction and retention of top talent in the company because prospective employees will shun companies with poor grievance management systems. Public litigation or disputes over complaints will only worsen an organisation’s reputation, and it then becomes very hard to maintain a positive employer brand. The other great consequence of not managing grievances properly is the costs incurred from industrial tribunals and compensation claims. When the grievances are not managed properly, employees will tend to take their grievances to higher external bodies and even employment tribunals, which involve enormous costs in terms of legal disputes. Consulthr (2023) justifies that the tribunal claim for unfair treatment, discrimination, or wrongful dismissal may result in a huge payout on compensation costs. Moreover, unresolved grievances can lead to higher absenteeism and lower productivity, impacting overall business performance Best Practices for Managing Grievances Preventing grievances requires clear, accessible, and consistently applied grievance policies. There should be training provided for managers on handling complaints in an objective, empathetic, and confidential manner. A culture of openness and support will go a long way toward bringing out into the open many of the problems before they can fester and become formal grievances. According to Sarma (2019), a grievance can be reduced to a great extent if the organization is proactive in addressing workplace conflicts through regular employee check-ins and the availability of multiple reporting channels. A well-handled grievance process eventually strengthens employee trust and organizational stability. |
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) MCIPD Experience Assessment Your Strengths and Development Areas
(Solution) New CIPS PDV Managing Prices and Costs Approaches
(Solution) CIPD 7C002 Question 11: Increased appetite of employees for L&D Opportunities at work
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply (PDC)
- In this assessment, an evaluation of ROSHN company contract terms and conditions have been evaluated.
- By selecting Facilities Management Contract, its effectiveness in ensuring quality issues, time extension risk, costs overruns and unethical practices has been evaluated.
- Further, the importance of performance measures and management in ROSHN company practices has been prioritised for evaluation. The contract terms and conditions have been quoted for evidencing the success of the contract implementation.
- In this assessment, the findings evidence that ROSHN facilities management spend category is characterised by various issues which are stipulated by the terms and conditions.
- The relevance of this is ensuring success in managing the overall faced challenges.
- By reviewing the different terms and conditions, the issues related to performance management, force majeure, costs, indemnity, risk management and insurance have been put into account.
- Also, the battle of forms have been evaluated with the best practice in their management identified.
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.