-75%
(Solution) New 5HR01 (AC2.1) Distinguish between organisational conflict and misbehaviour
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
KaribuCustomer
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
| (AC2.1) Distinguish between organisational conflict and misbehaviour.
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 400 words |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organisational Conflict
Organisational conflict refers to disagreements or clashes that arise between individuals or groups within a workplace due to differences in opinions, interests, or values (Herrity, 2023). It can manifest in both structured and unstructured ways, such as formal strikes, overtime bans, or protests, and often involves disputes over work conditions, policies, or decision-making. For example, a conflict may arise when employees are unhappy with new management decisions, such as changes to their benefits or working conditions, leading to a strike or a work-to-rule action where employees only perform their specific duties without engaging in any extra work. This type of conflict typically arises from collective grievances, which may be formally addressed through channels such as trade unions or employee committees (CIPD, 2020).Organisational conflict can often escalate if not properly managed, affecting morale, productivity, and overall workplace harmony. Organisational Misbehaviour Organisational misbehaviour refers to actions that are disruptive or deviant, but not necessarily part of an organised, collective effort (Faragher, 2020). Misbehaviour often involves individual or small group actions that defy established norms or rules within the organisation. Examples include absenteeism, sabotage, fraud, or walking out without prior notice. For instance, an employee may repeatedly call in sick, take longer breaks than allowed, or intentionally damage company property to express dissatisfaction or frustration. Unlike organisational conflict, misbehaviour is generally unorganised, and the root cause may stem from personal grievances or a lack of alignment between the employee’s values and the company’s expectations. Misbehaviour can disrupt productivity and create a toxic workplace environment, but it is often more difficult to address since it can be isolated or covert. Differences between Organisational Conflict and Misbehaviour
|
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC APGCM Module: Contract & Category Management in P&S
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
In summary, this report has provided a comprehensive analysis of ADNOC’s procurement strategies and risk management frameworks underscores the critical importance of proactive and strategic approaches in the energy sector. The key findings indicate that through embracing advanced technologies such as AI-driven analytics and supply chain management software, ADNOC can effectively anticipate market trends, mitigate operational risks, and enhance decision-making capabilities. Moreover, the development of agile compliance and sustainability programs enables ADNOC to adapt swiftly to regulatory changes while bolstering its reputation as a responsible corporate entity.
Another key finding is that supplier diversification emerges as a pivotal strategy to safeguard against supply chain disruptions, offering ADNOC flexibility and resilience in volatile market conditions. This is with the findings evidencing that strategic partnerships with suppliers not only mitigate risks associated with single-source dependency but also foster innovation and quality improvements. The emphasis on continuous performance improvement and the proactive management of contract lifecycles further contribute to ADNOC’s operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
By using different models and techniques analysis, ADNOC’s commitment to integrating these strategic recommendations into its procurement practices positions the organization to achieve sustainable growth, operational excellence, and competitive advantage in the global energy market. By aligning procurement strategies with broader organisational goals and leveraging cutting-edge technologies, ADNOC can navigate complexities, drive innovation, and ensure long-term success in a rapidly evolving industry landscape.
Recommendations
- Implement one AI-driven analytics platform by Q4 2024, integrating with existing systems and training staff to enhance forecasting accuracy and negotiate a 10% reduction in supplier costs, led by the IT, procurement, and finance departments. Despite potential initial costs and staff adaptation challenges, this initiative aims to achieve a 15% increase in forecasting accuracy.
- Fully deploy advanced supply chain management software by Q2 2025, partnering with a leading provider and training teams to reduce disruptions by 20%, thus increasing overall supply chain efficiency by 5%. This effort involves collaboration between supply chain management, IT, and vendor management teams, despite initial disruptions and high upfront costs.
- Establish a cross-functional compliance team by Q3 2024 to develop three new policies annually, ensuring 100% compliance with regulations and enhancing reputation metrics by 15%. Led by legal, compliance, and HR departments, this initiative aims to overcome resistance to policy changes and resource-intensive monitoring efforts.
- Implement three financial instruments (futures, options, currency swaps) by Q3 2024, collaborating with financial experts to reduce financial risks by 20% and achieve a 10% increase in financial stability. This effort, led by finance, risk management, and external advisors, addresses potential challenges in market volatility and regulatory constraints.
- Engage multiple suppliers and form five strategic partnerships by Q4 2024, increasing supplier diversity by 30% and improving supply chain reliability metrics by 10%. Led by procurement, vendor management, and supply chain analysts, this initiative aims to mitigate dependency risks and manage supplier relationships effectively. Potential challenges include maintaining consistency in product/service quality across diverse suppliers and increased administrative burden in managing multiple partnerships.
- Conduct market and competitor analyses twice a year starting Q3 2024, aiming to increase procurement cost savings by 15% through better negotiation strategies and timely market insights. This effort, involving procurement, and strategy departments, addresses challenges in data availability and competitive analysis capabilities. Potential challenges include delays in obtaining and analysing market data and difficulty in predicting competitive moves accurately.
(Solution) CIPS Module 6- Project, Programme and Change Management in Procurement and Supply Chain
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
For this project, the purpose was to access the overarching process and approach to SRM within Oxy organisation and coming up with appropriate implementation plan. The relevance of this project was informed by the fact that with the organisation having a large scale of operations with multiple end users, SRM is a significant issue. Also, the organisation operating in both local and international operations with multiple suppliers and spend areas to be coordinated. The outcome of this would be to promote and improve SRM for aligning with Oxy organisation strategic objectifies, supply chain function being strategic integral partner as opposed to just transactional player. Owing to the importance of SRM improvement, the different outcomes would entail;
- Enhanced Suppliers Performance- With an upward of 50,000 orders annually with 40% valued more than 5 million Omanis and 50% 20 Million Omanis, failure to timely settle invoices, demand for high quality materials and minimising effects would be considered.
- Cost savings- With improved SRM, it is possible for Oxy to negotiate appropriate terms, lower procurement costs (5 Rights not currently achieved) hence working below targets and lead times delivery reduced and achieving economies of scale.
- Increased efficiency- improved and streamlined SRM improve operational efficiency, reducing wastes in administration process for SRM (25% of entire suppliers pay delayed)
- Risk mitigation- this include identification of risks linked with suppliers such as dissatisfaction, financial instability and geopolitical challenges
- Oxy organisation PS&M is supposed to come up with appropriate systems and techniques for improvement of SRM
- Oxy organisation need to make sure they use various automations including AI and robotics for improving collaboration and SRM efficiency.
- Facilitate policies management for improving their operations in onshore and offshore operations with an improved SRM
- Short courses on SRM need to be provided starting with PS&M leadership to achieve 50% increase in awareness of SRM improvements areas.
- Stakeholders relations improved by leveraging on available technologies of communication and interaction.
- Ensure there is 70% increase in budget on SRM improvements
(Solution) 5CO02 (AC1.1) Evaluate the concept of evidence-based practice including how it can be applied to decision-making in people practice
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPD Selection Criteria for Sales Assistant
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPS Category Analysis Kraljic Matrix Analysis Example
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPD Oakwood Assessment ID / CIPD_5OS06_23_01 5OS06 Leadership and management development
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.