(Solution) MCIPD Experience Assessment Knowledge and Impact Report
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 50.00.£ 20.00Current price is: £ 20.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Section 1: Being an expert on people Please note there are six questions to complete in this section. Please scroll down to ensure that you complete all the required elements.
1. Describe a time when you’ve led the development and delivery of a new or improved approach using a range of people practices or interventions. (At the end of this report you’ll be asked to provide some supporting documents which showcase this work.) What was the new approach you developed and delivered? Why was this so important? What practices and interventions did you use? What wider organisation culture, processes, structures and systems did you have to take into account to ensure your approach was effective? What measurable impact has this approach had on employees, the organisation or people profession? Please describe the quantitative impact. (You may want to refer to the candidate guidance for more information.) What qualitative value has this approach created for employees, the organisation or people profession? (You may want to refer to the candidate guidance for 3 / 12 450 Words 200 Words 250 Words 300 Words Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member more information.)
2. Think about your organisation (or an organisation you have worked in recently): How do people practices in your area of work create value for a range of stakeholders?
3. Tell us about when you’ve used TWO of the following approaches to create value: (i) facilitation, (ii) consulting, (iii) coaching and (iv) mentoring, and how you applied them in their specific context. Please give separate examples for the two approaches you’ve chosen.
4. Give an example of the way employment legislation or regulation impacts your work.
5. How can technology support the delivery of people practices and improve the worker experience? (You may use examples of technology that you use in your organisation, or other technology you are aware of.)
6. Please refer to the Resources page for Chartered Member, and the document in the section called ‘Workplace ethics’. Consider a current or future people issue you will be facing, and apply different ethical lenses / perspectives to this situation. What is the people issue / decision you are facing? Who is involved? Which lenses did you apply and what insights did this provide? What is your recommended way forward and why? 4 / 12 200 Words 400 Words 200 Words 200 Words 500 Words
Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member 5 / 12 Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member Section 2: Being an expert on work Please note there are four questions to complete in this section. Please scroll down to ensure that you complete all the required elements.
1. Think about your organisation (or an organisation you have worked in recently). Describe how you develop and sustain your understanding of organisation strategy, products, services and customers, and what this means for your work. What activities do you undertake? What is your approach? How do you translate this to your work? What external trends are impacting on the organisation? How is it responding? What impact is this having on performance?
2. Give an example of a time when you developed a people plan or proposal. How did you communicate it?
3. Please refer to the Resources page for Chartered Member, and the podcast and infographic in the section called ‘Evidencebased practice’. Use these resources – as well as your own knowledge – to consider a current / future work issue you will be facing. What is the issue or problem? What is the key question to answer? What range of evidence could you 6 / 12 350 Words 150 Words 200 Words 500 Words
Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member use and how will you source this? How can you evaluate the evidence to determine its relevance and trustworthiness?
4. Please refer to the Resources page for Chartered Member, and the report in the section called ‘People analytics’. Reflect on this report and consider the following: What measures do you currently use to assess the impact of your work on people and the wider organisation? How could you make greater use of people measures and analytics in your work? 7 / 12 300 Words Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member Section
3: Being an expert on change Please note there are two questions to complete in this section. Please scroll down to ensure that you complete all the required elements.
1. Tell us about a time when you’ve taken a leading role in the planning and implementation of change that had a medium term impact on an organisation (and its people) or the people profession. (At the end of this report you’ll be asked to provide some supporting documents which showcase this work.) What were your objectives and the drivers for this change? What were the risks? Who were your key stakeholders? How did you involve and engage them and with what purpose? How did your approach take into account the organisation’s culture, and the way people experience change? What change management principles and approaches did you use? Which levers did you use to enable change?
2. Referring to the example of change that you described in the previous question: 8 / 12 350 Words 200 Words 300 Words Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member What measurable impact has this change had on employees, the organisation or the people profession? Please describe the quantitative impact. (You may want to refer to the candidate guidance for more information.) What qualitative value has this change created for employees, the organisation or people profession? (You may want to refer to the candidate guidance for more information.) 9 / 12 250 Words 300 Words
Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member Section 4: Supporting evidence Please provide supporting evidence for the pieces of work described in: Section 1 question 1 Section 3 question 1 It’s up to you what to submit. What we’re looking for is evidence that best showcases what you’ve delivered and the impact your work had, to support the examples you provided in those two questions. You should submit at least one document and no more than six documents. Examples of what you might want to include could be: Evidence of the impact of your work (such as KPIs, metrics or the wider value created) Plans Presentations Reports Policy documents Please refer to the Candidate Guidance Pack for more detailed information on what evidence to provide. Accepted file types will include Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF and images (gif, jpeg and png). Please list the documents you are submitting here. Explain which examples each document relates to and why you are submitting them. Note: We understand that some of the projects and work you discuss and use as evidence may be of a sensitive nature. The information is used only for Experience Assessment purposes, and membership assessors enter into a contract to ensure confidentiality and protection of data/information. You may wish to remove sensitive information from any submission, such as names of individual staff etc. 10 / 12 10 MB at max 250 Words Candidate: Mohammed Salem Al Beshr Membership No: 47572935 Grade applied for: Chartered Member Section 5: Names of people to support your evidence Who can support your evidence? Please provide the names of two key individuals who are able to corroborate your work and the impact you’ve had. Please check that these people are happy for you to provide their names and contact details, as we may get in touch with them. The people whose names you put forward should be able to comment in an informed way about your work and the impact you’ve had. They could be your line manager, clients or colleagues (e.g. senior managers or project sponsors). You don’t need to indicate which pieces of work each colleague can support. By submitting your colleagues’ details you confirm that you have their permission to provide their details to CIPD, which will be processed in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (2018). Details of your first colleague Name: Organisation: Job title: Telephone: Email: Please explain your relationship to this person and why they can support your work: Details of your second colleague Name: Organisation: Job title: Telephone: Email: Please explain your relationship to this person and why they can support your work:
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) MCIPD Experience Assessment Your Strengths and Development Areas
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.
(Solution) CIPS MER Developing Contracts
- In SWOT analysis, one of the identified weakness is failure to use technologies in their sourcing approach. As a best practice, Ericsson can make investments in modernised technology including AI, machine learning in improving their sourcing strategies
- Since there is no one-size-fits all approach of selection criteria and sourcing strategies, the best practice would be to harness collaborative and partnerships relations for success of their sourcing.
- Pursue a holistic L&D practices by the PS&M in order to understand the best sourcing approach which would be in a position of enhancing the overall process of sourcing
- Further, from the risk analysis, some of the risks identified are not UpToDate. Hence, it is important continuously updating supply chain networks for identifying potential risks which are internal and external.