Description
Question
Your Professional Development Report
Your Professional Development Report is the place for you to tell us about your development experiences and learning, and the way they’ve impacted your practice.
We are also interested in your own and two stakeholders’ perspectives of your strengths and areas for development.
Please note that there are three sections to complete:
Reflection on your learning
Your strengths and development areas
Stakeholder Feedback – to be completed by two stakeholders of your choice
Reflection on your learning
Please note that there are two questions to answer in this section. Please scroll down to ensure that you complete all the required elements.
The bullet points under each question are an indication of what we’re looking for. To give yourself the best chance of success, please ensure you respond to each bullet in your answers.
When we talk about ‘professional development experiences and activities’, we mean any learning you’ve experienced. It could be formal learning such as a webinar or training, or a collaboration session you’ve been a part of at work. It may be something you’ve read, or a discussion with colleagues or your wider network, or collaborating with peers at a conference. Or it could be learning which you’ve had as part of your role, such as leading a new approach to people practice, research, or in-depth learning about new sectors when working with new client organisations.
Describe a range of specific professional development experiences and / or activities you have undertaken recently (within the last five years). What did you learn?
|
400 words
How will these development experiences / activities change your professional practice in the future?
|
200 words
Submitting your Reflection on your learning
Once you’ve completed your Reflection on your learning you’ll be able to view and use the submit button*.
Please note that once you’ve submitted your Reflection on your learning you won’t be able to make any further changes to it. Although you will be able to view and print off your submission.
We recommend therefore that you review the information you’ve provided before submitting. You can do this by using the ‘previous’ and ‘next’ buttons or by returning to your homepage and printing off your full submission.
*If the submit button doesn’t appear, there are incomplete sections within your submission. Please use the ‘previous’ and ‘next’ buttons to review what you’ve entered.
Solution
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) Level 7 7CO03 Personal effectiveness ethics and business acumen Learning Journal Template
(Solution) recommended strategy support Proximie’s marketing goals and position within its industry
(Solution) CIPS Assessment 1 PDV- Managing Expenditures with Suppliers
- In this assessment, by selecting a category of spend, the importance to organisation stakeholders has been provided.
- The organisation of focus is Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU). Also, by carrying out brief market analysis, an explanation of the extent in which procurement function offer value for money outcomes has been produced.
- The selected category of spend in RCU is the Information Technology (IT) and cybersecurity. In particular, the IT infrastructure and equipment sub-category of spend has been prioritised for evaluation.
- In order to achieve this assessment objectives, appropriate purchasing models have been selected for application.
- These included Mendelow Matrix Analysis, Porter’s 5 Forces, STEEPLE, SWOT analysis and more.
(Solution) CIPD 7OS05 Effective Management of Talent in International Organisations
(Solution) Oakwood Assessment ID / CIPD_3CO04_24_01 3CO04 Essentials of people practice
(Solution) CIPS FIDIC Terms and Conditions PDC
- This report evaluates the terms and conditions that are applicable in a contract management process to improve its implementation.
- By referencing FIDIC organisation terms and conditions, their effectiveness in mitigating issues with time, unethical, quality, costs and performance management has been evaluated.
- These terms and conditions are grouped into the goods quality, guidelines of goods and services inspection, communication, and time extension.
- Part of the analysis involves the evaluation of performance measures essential to improve management and monitoring of the stakeholder’s involvement in the contract process.
- At the end, battle of forms has been evaluated, which involves failure to agree on set terms and conditions.
- To solve this, short-term rule and long-term rule and Lord Deming could be adopted.