(Solution) Experience Assessment Reflection on Your Learning MCIPD
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 20.00Current price is: £ 20.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Question
Your Professional Development Report
Your Professional Development Report is the place for you to tell us about your development experiences and learning, and the way they’ve impacted your practice.
We are also interested in your own and two stakeholders’ perspectives of your strengths and areas for development.
Please note that there are three sections to complete:
Reflection on your learning
Your strengths and development areas
Stakeholder Feedback – to be completed by two stakeholders of your choice
Reflection on your learning
Please note that there are two questions to answer in this section. Please scroll down to ensure that you complete all the required elements.
The bullet points under each question are an indication of what we’re looking for. To give yourself the best chance of success, please ensure you respond to each bullet in your answers.
When we talk about ‘professional development experiences and activities’, we mean any learning you’ve experienced. It could be formal learning such as a webinar or training, or a collaboration session you’ve been a part of at work. It may be something you’ve read, or a discussion with colleagues or your wider network, or collaborating with peers at a conference. Or it could be learning which you’ve had as part of your role, such as leading a new approach to people practice, research, or in-depth learning about new sectors when working with new client organisations.
Describe a range of specific professional development experiences and / or activities you have undertaken recently (within the last five years). What did you learn?
|
|
400 words
How will these development experiences / activities change your professional practice in the future?
|
|
200 words
Submitting your Reflection on your learning
Once you’ve completed your Reflection on your learning you’ll be able to view and use the submit button*.
Please note that once you’ve submitted your Reflection on your learning you won’t be able to make any further changes to it. Although you will be able to view and print off your submission.
We recommend therefore that you review the information you’ve provided before submitting. You can do this by using the ‘previous’ and ‘next’ buttons or by returning to your homepage and printing off your full submission.
*If the submit button doesn’t appear, there are incomplete sections within your submission. Please use the ‘previous’ and ‘next’ buttons to review what you’ve entered.
Solution
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD Level 7 7HR01: Strategic Employment Relations
(Solution) CIPS FIDIC Contracts Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award (APCE)
- In this report, an evaluation of a contract by Oracle which is FIDIC guiding their construction projects in more than 67 countries globally has been carried out.
- It is evident from the analysis that there are varying contractual terms having an influence on the power and risk distribution between a supplier and an organisation.
- The rationale of this is that a contract is a legally enforceable agreement between different parties with specific acts or practices to be put into account.
- The core report areas of focus of focus has included the issues of price, quality, construction projects delivery timeline and health and safety have been put into account on the extent in which the risk and power are distributed between the contractor and the organisations.
- In the components identified, it is evident that irrespective of whether the buyer or supplier executes the risk or power.
- Through the application of different tools such as Mendelow stakeholders matrix, SWOT analysis and others, distinct issues and risks characterised by various challenges in the construction projects execution with their mitigation approaches and risks have been evidenced.
- As evidenced from the Kraljic analysis, it is evident that contractual terms have a strategic relevance in the context of Oracle informing on their holistic leveraging on the risks and powers of the contract.
- In situations where Oracle fails in leveraging on contract holistic risks power balance, warrant and also insurance cover is used.
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Sourcing Essentials- PSE
- In this report, the area of focus is on different sourcing approaches which can be used in procurement and supply management (PS&M) in contemporary business environment. This is through the focus of ROSHN organisation in Design Building category of spend.
- To achieve the intended aim of this report, data has been sourced from the organisation internal documents, different CIPS modules and models (Mendelow, STEEPLE and Kraljic). The key findings include ROSHN prefeed approach being multiple sourcing owing to the high-level of market competitiveness. This is with sole and single approaches preferred when only one supplier is being engaged owing to differences in organisation needs.
- Also, the findings evidence that single sourcing prevail in an event many suppliers are available, but an organisation decides to go for one. Another finding in this report is that dual sourcing is used when different methods/options for sourcing are embraced and put in place.
- Finally, through the application of supplier appraisal tool, focusing on the Design Building spend area, an evaluation has been put into account. The result from the appraisal using Carter’s 10C’s evidence organisation success to achieve value for money outcomes and improved market development.
- Internal and external analysis to identify most appropriate sourcing strategy
- Broad sourcing appraisal strategy need to be introduced
- Focus on managing successful sourcing strategy as part of organisation policy and practices
- Involve more stakeholders as part of their operations for success in sourcing strategy
- Pursuing capacity development initiatives for PS&M understanding of relevance of different PS&M
(Solution) 7HR03 concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits and recommendations
(Solution) Level 5 Assessment ID / CIPD_5HR01_24_015HR01 Employment relationship management
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC APGCM Module: Contract & Category Management in P&S
- Implement one AI-driven analytics platform by Q4 2024, integrating with existing systems and training staff to enhance forecasting accuracy and negotiate a 10% reduction in supplier costs, led by the IT, procurement, and finance departments. Despite potential initial costs and staff adaptation challenges, this initiative aims to achieve a 15% increase in forecasting accuracy.
- Fully deploy advanced supply chain management software by Q2 2025, partnering with a leading provider and training teams to reduce disruptions by 20%, thus increasing overall supply chain efficiency by 5%. This effort involves collaboration between supply chain management, IT, and vendor management teams, despite initial disruptions and high upfront costs.
- Establish a cross-functional compliance team by Q3 2024 to develop three new policies annually, ensuring 100% compliance with regulations and enhancing reputation metrics by 15%. Led by legal, compliance, and HR departments, this initiative aims to overcome resistance to policy changes and resource-intensive monitoring efforts.
- Implement three financial instruments (futures, options, currency swaps) by Q3 2024, collaborating with financial experts to reduce financial risks by 20% and achieve a 10% increase in financial stability. This effort, led by finance, risk management, and external advisors, addresses potential challenges in market volatility and regulatory constraints.
- Engage multiple suppliers and form five strategic partnerships by Q4 2024, increasing supplier diversity by 30% and improving supply chain reliability metrics by 10%. Led by procurement, vendor management, and supply chain analysts, this initiative aims to mitigate dependency risks and manage supplier relationships effectively. Potential challenges include maintaining consistency in product/service quality across diverse suppliers and increased administrative burden in managing multiple partnerships.
- Conduct market and competitor analyses twice a year starting Q3 2024, aiming to increase procurement cost savings by 15% through better negotiation strategies and timely market insights. This effort, involving procurement, and strategy departments, addresses challenges in data availability and competitive analysis capabilities. Potential challenges include delays in obtaining and analysing market data and difficulty in predicting competitive moves accurately.