(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Negotiation Process
In this integrated assessment, a focus on a formal negotiation plan has been pursued. This is through the focus of Roshn organisation which is a Saudi Arabia’s largest real estate development company owned by the Public Investment Fund for KSA, has Vision 2030 supplier sourcing management strategies. The firm’s procurement department relies on a model outlined by Bailey et al that provides a rigorous approach to preparation and analysis in order to get better bargains. Hence, the Roshn internal supplier data collection and external market research to create accurate supplier risk and sourcing plans.
A variety of tools is applied, such as the Kraljic Matrix that is used to sort suppliers. The key findings note that different training activities include negotiation simulations and skills to prepare and help procurement officers for the journey. Another key finding ius that detailed planning and analytical structures accompany objectives and concession tracking. Another key finding note that supply relations are strategically classified on issues of risk and consequences as far as supply management is concerned. On a continuous basis, repetition and necessarily sequenced post negotiation reviews improve processes gradually for a successful negotiation plan.
From the findings and conclusions obtained, to maximise efficiency and optimise outcomes, it is recommended:
- Roshn standardise the Bailey et al procurement framework.
- Regular training will develop negotiation mastery, and the Kraljic Matrix will tailor strategies per supplier importance.
- Sourcing strategies should evolve through market reviews. Building long-term, trusting partnerships will foster competitiveness beyond transactions.
- Clear metrics measuring initiatives’ success will empower data-driven process adjustments.
- Adopting these practices will enhance Roshn’s sustainable sourcing in support of Vision 2030 goals.
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Negotiation
Negotiation is a mutual business interaction between or among people and organizations in an attempt to reach desired goals, resolve conflicts or avoid controversy. It encompasses collaboration, negotiation, and part of agreeing to reach agreeable terms that will benefit all persons of interest. In procurement and supply context, negotiation aims at acquiring resources at the best rate, at the same time maintaining and developing supplier relations.
The negotiation model developed by Bailey et al is a strategic model particularly in procurement and supply. The model outlines three key stages: Pre-negotiation Preparation, Negotiation/Interaction, and Post-negotiation Follow-up.
- Pre-negotiation Preparation: This stage is very important since it creates a platform that facilitates negotiations. It covers the collection and evaluation of inside and outside context data including things like suppliers’ capacities, estimate of future demand, historical price information, regulative requirements and the likes (OPR, 2021). There are also the analyses of stakeholders as well as the bargaining power which is done by applying some tools like Mendelow Matrix, Porter’s five forces model and Kraljic Matrix as far as the supplier market power is concerned. Key issues and/ or risks are as follows while strategies are planned as follows. Moreover, the roles in the team are assigned and the schedule for the meeting and its organization is developed.
- Negotiation/Interaction: This is phase involves bargaining such that different parties talk in order to come to the agreement. It entails getting the most out of a situation by controlling confrontation, finding solutions, and cobbling rapport (OPR,2021). The most important requirements are the possibility of continuous, open, and trustful communication in the inter-organizational relationship, market knowledge, and the systematic assessment of the counterparty.
- Post-negotiation Follow-up: This stage keeps the customers on the right track and look at how to resolve any issue that may be remaining after the contract has been signed. The follow-up phase is critical since it preserves the supplier relations, and at the same time deal with contractual issues.
The implementation of the Bailey et al. model in ROSHN itself highlights strong prospects for achieving advanced procurement sourcing strategies by mapping a significant investment in technology and infrastructure into Vision 2030 in Saudi Arabia. This structured approach is helpful to ROSHN of accomplishing its mission of delivering sustainable communities through the strategic positioning of suppliers and management of contracts.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD 7OS05 Challenges facing people practice managers in international organisations
(Solution) CIPD Level 7 Advanced Diploma in Strategic People Management – Unit 7CO04 Business Research in People Practice
(Solution) (AC4.1) Assess suitable types of contractual arrangements dependent on specific workforce need
Solution Permanent, full-time contracts Permanent, full-time contracts for delivery drivers offer both benefits and drawbacks, making their suitability dependent on ParcelCare’s operational needs and goals. Pros Permanent, full-time contracts provide job security and consistent income for delivery drivers, enhancing employee satisfaction and loyalty. This stability can lead to higher motivation and productivity, reducing turnover rates and the associated costs of recruitment and training as evidenced by Personio (2023). Full-time contracts also facilitate better workforce planning, ensuring ParcelCare has reliable staffing to meet delivery demands. Cons However, these contracts can be less flexible and more costly for the company. Full-time employees typically require benefits such as health insurance, paid leave, and retirement plans, increasing operational expenses. Additionally, the rigidity of permanent contracts may not align with fluctuating delivery volumes, leading to inefficiencies during low-demand periods. Suitability For ParcelCare, full-time contracts can be suitable if delivery volumes are consistently high, ensuring a stable workforce. However, a mixed model that includes part-time or flexible contracts might offer the necessary flexibility to adapt to changing demands while controlling costs. Part-Time Contracts Part-time contracts offer flexibility for delivery drivers, allowing them to balance work with other commitments. Drivers benefit from a stable income, albeit at reduced hours, while ParcelCare can adjust staffing levels according to demand. A significant advantage of part-time contracts is reduced costs associated with employee benefits, as part-time workers may not qualify for full benefits packages (Abogados, 2019). However, part-time drivers may lack the same commitment or availability as full-time employees, potentially impacting reliability and consistency. Zero-Hours Contracts Zero-hours contracts provide maximum flexibility, allowing ParcelCare to scale staffing up or down based on delivery demand without a fixed commitment to provide hours (CIPD, 2023c). For drivers, these contracts offer freedom to accept or decline work, appealing to those seeking flexibility. However, they also result in income uncertainty and lack of guaranteed hours, which can be challenging for drivers seeking stability. For ParcelCare, zero-hours contracts minimise costs during low-demand periods but may lead to difficulties in maintaining a loyal and consistent workforce due to potential driver dissatisfaction. Part-time contracts are most suitable for ParcelCare’s delivery drivers. They offer a stable income and consistent work schedule, which can enhance job satisfaction and reliability while allowing ParcelCare to adjust staffing levels as needed. This balance supports both operational needs and employee stability. Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full