Description
Solution
4.1 Analysis of Stakeholders in Corporate Strategy
Stakeholders entail what Chebbi et al. (2020) identify as ‘people or organisations with interests on corporate strategy influencing how it is implemented’. Considering HWE, a summary of their stakeholders analysis is illustrated in the following;
Figure 1: A summary of HWE Stakeholders
Further, the Mendelow Matrix Analysis is appropriate for stakeholders relationships in the corporate strategy implementation;
Figure 2:Summary of Mendelow Stakeholders Analysis
Source: CIPS (2022)
High Power; Low Interest- UK community and health sector institutions have high power in influencing the corporate strategy. Through a leverage on high-level power with interests harness appropriateness of stakeholders relations.
Low Power; High influence- The administration and management are not actively involved in the development of the corporate strategy but largely impact the outcomes. This is while influencing how collaboration, consultations and information sets are exchanged successfully.
High Power; High Influence- The supply teams, PS&M departments and accounts team have high-level power and influencing how it is developed and eventually pursued as part of the process.
Low Power; Low Interest– The UK government and also competitors in the healthcare sector are primarily only keep informed stakeholders with limited input on the corporate strategy. They play a facilitative roles and are found influencing developing policies and focus.
4.2 Analysis of External Factors which Impact Strategic Aims
To identify different external factors, it is relevant using STEEPLED Analysis appropriately (CIPS , 2023a). This is appropriate for varying organisation functions to discover, evaluate, organise and track entire external risks;
Please click the following icon to access this project in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 7C003 Discuss the merits of evidence-based critical thinking based upon a range of data analytics
(Solution) 5C003 New (AC1.2) Recognise how personal and ethical values can be applied in the context of people practice
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.
(Solution) 7CO03 Learning Journal Ethical standpoints on people practice and the maintenance of high standards of ethical behaviour
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC Onshore Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply (PDC)
- Improve the awareness level amongst the PS&M teams for aligning their terms and conditions in different contracts
- Establishing various terms and conditions for their different spend categories
- Mutually agree on the different terms and conditions for solving battle of the forms issue
- To initiate technology and innovativeness for the overall PS&M operations
- Be able to implement various KPIs and SLAs on contract adoption