-67%
Awaiting product image
Click to enlarge

(Solution) CIPS APGCE Analysis of Stakeholders in Corporate Strategy

New User Gifts

First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.

KaribuCustomer

Original price was: £ 30.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.

Payment Methods:

Description

Solution

4.1 Analysis of Stakeholders in Corporate Strategy

Stakeholders entail what Chebbi et al. (2020) identify as ‘people or organisations with interests on corporate strategy influencing how it is implemented’. Considering HWE, a summary of their stakeholders analysis is illustrated in the following;

Figure 1: A summary of HWE Stakeholders

Further, the Mendelow Matrix Analysis is appropriate for stakeholders relationships in the corporate strategy implementation;

Figure 2:Summary of Mendelow Stakeholders Analysis

Source: CIPS (2022)

High Power; Low Interest- UK community and health sector institutions have high power in influencing the corporate strategy. Through a leverage on high-level power with interests harness appropriateness of stakeholders relations.

Low Power; High influence- The administration and management are not actively involved in the development of the corporate strategy but largely impact the outcomes. This is while influencing how collaboration, consultations and information sets are exchanged successfully.

High Power; High Influence- The supply teams, PS&M departments and accounts team have high-level power and influencing how it is developed and eventually pursued as part of the process.

Low Power; Low Interest– The UK government and also competitors in the healthcare sector are primarily only keep informed stakeholders with limited input on the corporate strategy. They play a facilitative roles and are found influencing developing policies and focus.

4.2 Analysis of External Factors which Impact Strategic Aims

To identify different external factors, it is relevant using STEEPLED Analysis appropriately (CIPS , 2023a). This is appropriate for varying organisation functions to discover, evaluate, organise and track entire external risks;

Table 1:STEEPLED Factors

Please click the following icon to access this project in full

Related Papers

-75%
Placeholder

(Solution) New Royal Commission for AIUla (RCU) Commercial Negotiation Plan- PIN

Original price was: £ 40.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
This procurement negotiation plan for the ROSHN organization focuses on the aspects of planning and executive negotiations in obtaining the IT consultancy services. It uses the Bailey et al. negotiation model with the mixed approaches of Porter’s 5 Forces and PESTLED frameworks to carry out the evaluation of the market competencies for enhancing the negotiation plans. The selected approach focuses with creating stable, win-win relationship with suppliers where most of the concentration is for quality suppliers who have efficient timeline delivery and risk control than just focusing on the price. Expert holistic planning is imperative to this plan, starting with internal need analysis and assessment of inherent risks and stakeholders. It must be noted that the information founded in this article would help ROSHN effectively strategise its course of action in face of organisational goals as well as market forces.. Key recommendations from this negotiation plan include:
  • Establishing an Integrated Digital Procurement System within the next year to track project timelines and quality metrics, aiming for a 20% improvement in service reliability for IT consultancy services.
  • Implementing a Comprehensive Supplier Training Program over the next year, with a goal of achieving at least 80% supplier participation to ensure alignment with ROSHN's operational standards and improve service quality by 25%.
  • Conducting Quarterly Supplier Performance Evaluations, utilizing a performance scorecard for at least 90% of suppliers to assess compliance with agreed-upon targets, with the objective of increasing average performance metrics by 15% over the year.
  • Developing an Enhanced Risk Assessment Protocol within six months to identify and mitigate key risks in the IT consultancy supply chain, targeting a 30% reduction in overall risk exposure through proactive measures.
These recommendations aim to enhance negotiation effectiveness, drive value for money, and cultivate long-term, strategic partnerships with IT consultancy suppliers. This approach not only addresses immediate procurement needs but also strengthens ROSHN's market position by integrating sustainable and proactive practices into its negotiation processes.
-33%
Placeholder

(Solution) 70S05 Question 4 (AC 4.1) Balancing Global Corporate Norms with Local Labour Practices

Original price was: £ 15.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution 70S05- Managing People in an International Context Question 4 (AC 4.1) In balancing global people management practices and change
-67%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPS APGCE Relationship of strategy, corporate, business and functional structures

Original price was: £ 30.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution 2.0 Relationship of strategy, corporate, business and functional structures Similar to procurement strategy CIPS (2023b), it aligns the entire
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPS Developing Contracts PDC Battle of the Forms

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution In the process adopted to manage the contracts, battle of the forms is evident in varying terms and conditions
-67%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPD 7C004 Task 2.3: Ethical Issues Connected with Project

Original price was: £ 30.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution For this research work, ethical issues would be put into account being a normal occurrence in this research. The
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) Negotiation Plan Red Sea Global Practitioner Corporate Award Assignment- PIN

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
This final assignment is integrated and intend to develop a formal negotiation plan for an organisation Procurement and Supply Management (PS&M). The areas of focus include driving value through procurement and supply, managing expenditure, contracts development, sourcing essentials, and negotiation in PS&M. The organisation of focus is Red Sea Global (RSG) Organisation a luxury, sustainability and innovation convergence for redefining development process. This is by focusing on the Cost Estimation Service (CES) spend category which are instrumental for RSG active practices. In order to obtain appropriate findings in this negotiation plan, various tools including STEEPLE, Porter’s 5 Forces, SWOT analysis and Mendelow Matrix Stakeholders have been embrace for development of a negotiation plan. This is guided by the view that RSG as a development sector organisation has their priority on improving cost management efficiency and success in coming up with new developments and tourism  models. With the tourism  sector slowly recovering from POST-COVID pandemic negative  implication by economic slowdown, financial resources in RSG PS&M and negotiations have reduced. As such, the existing resources for RSG are not much. Therefore, the value for money outcomes in the negotiation strategy is supposed to be put into consideration. For RCG, this is the rationale of coming up with a detailed negotiation plan for success in PS&M operations. The negotiation plan is in alignment with various sourcing approaches, terms and conditions and varying  expectations. The key findings indicate the best practice include use of different content in development of a negotiation plan. The steps followed have been identified to include preparation, test, propose, bargain, agree and close. The key findings also highlight the essential of involving all organisation stakeholders as part of the negotiation. This is with stakeholders relationships being essential. Another key finding is that for success in the negotiation process, leverage on BATNA and MLA is essential to obtain relevant findings. From the findings and also conclusions obtained, various recommendations can be generated. The recommendations inclue nee to initiate sufficient planning to involve all the stakeholders while at the same time holistically investing in technologies and managing conflicts of interest. Another recommendation include need to customise negotiation strategy informed by market environment factors.