Description
Solution
| Explain the difference between fair and unfair dismissal. Short references should be added into your narrative below. (AC3.5) If you use secondary sources you should include your short references in the narrative here. Wordcount: Approximately 250 words. |
| Fair Dismissal
This identify a process pursued to terminate an employee employment contract for valid reasons including misconduct or lacking capability and an appropriate procedure/steps followed (Worknest, 2017). The examples include; Gross Misconduct– In Clean Quarter, for any employee who steal from the organisation store can be dismissed in a fair manner. After an in-depth investigation which allow staff responses as highlighted by ACAS Code of Conduct (ACAS, 2020). Here, the dismissal due to misconduct is fair-based practice. Long-term bad performance– For Clean Quarter underperforming Sales Team fail to achieve target after two written performance improvement strategy as stipulated to the contract. Considering the employers can justify they offer improvement opportunities and fairness in the process; employment tribunal would identify the dismissal as lacking capability legitimate. Unfair Dismissal Unfair dismissal is evident in an event the employees termination is made with zero valid reason including misconduct or not following appropriate dismissal procedure as set by laws and the ACAS (2023) guidelines. The examples include; Whistleblowing– There is an instance where employees could be fired after reporting a health and safety issue affecting them. In Clean Quarter, this is albeit the provision in the Public Interest Disclosure Act. Discrimination– In Clean Quarter, an employee young in age who is pregnant could be dismissed without passing to performance management phases in the contract. The unfair dismissal entail lack of substantial rationale as stipulated by law such as report issues or due process including performance phases with fair dismissal at all times justified and adhering to the procedure fully.
|
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_3CO01_24_01 3CO01 Business, culture and change in context
(Solution) 7C003 Discuss how business acumen can deliver commercial benefits and manage resilience
(Solution) New Assessment ID/CIPD_3CO03_24_01 Core behaviours for people professionals
(Solution) CIPS PIN NUPCO Formal Commercial Negotiation Plan
- For the current integrated modules assignment, a formal negotiation plan has been developed appropriate for the Procurement and Supply Management (PS&M) focusing on organisation operations.
- In this assessment, the National Unified Procurement Company (NUPCO) a leader in Saudi Arabia procurement, logistics and supply chain management for pharmaceutical, medical devices and supplies for government hospitals in Saudi Arabia (KSA).
- Further, the Ultrasound Machines procurement category has been identified in this report. By successfully reflecting on the content from driving value through procurement and supply, managing expenditures, developing contracts, sourcing essentials, negotiation in procurement and supply, relevant insights of the negotiation plan has been provided. Further, in this integrative assessment, the various tools applied include STEEPLE, Porter’s 5 Forces, SWOT analysis and Mendelow Matrix Stakeholders have been used to develop a successful negotiation strategy.
- The importance of this has been informed by the fact that NUPCO being a procurement organisation prioritise on attaining cost spending efficiencies and improvement of the healthcare services providers to government hospitals.
- This is with the skills, concessions, alternatives in the negotiation prioritised identified in this integrative assessment.
