Description
Solution
SECTION 2
1.4 Data Analysis
To calculate the percentage turnover for each department, I used the formula:
Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Leavers) ×100
2020
- Administration: 4/22×100=18.2%
- Maintenance: 5/9×100=55.6%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 70/231×100=30.3%
- People Team: 1/6×100=16.7%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 19/42×100=45.2%
- Packing & Dispatch: 21/36×100=58.3%
- Finance: 2/5×100=40%
2021
- Administration: 8/20×100=40%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 3/2198×100=16.2%
- People Team: 0/6×100=0%
- Research & Design: 0/3×100=0%
- Sales: 3/35×100=8.6%
- Packing & Despatch: 6/15×100=40%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2022
- Administration: 9/20×100=45%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 1/4×100=25%
- Production: 3/8178×100=21.3%
- People Team: 3/6×100=50%
- Research & Design: 0/4×100=0%
- Sales: 0/40×100=0%
- Packing & Despatch: 8/16×100=50%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2023
- Administration: 2/18×100=11.1%
- Maintenance: 1/7×100=14.3%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 29/181×100=16%
- People Team: 2/5×100=40%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 2/45×100=4.4%
- Packing & Despatch: 3/15×100=20%
- Finance: 0/3×100=0%
To calculate the overall turnover rate for the entire organization each year, we sum the total number of leavers and total employees, then apply the turnover formula:
Overall Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Total Leavers) ×100
2020:
- Total employees = 359
- Total leavers = 123
- Turnover: 123359×100=34.3%
2021:
- Total employees = 285
- Total leavers = 52
- Turnover: 52285×100=18.2%
2022:
- Total employees = 275
- Total leavers = 62
- Turnover: 62275×100=22.5%
2023:
- Total employees = 282
- Total leavers = 40
- Turnover: 40282×100=14.2%
Data Presentation
- Bar Graph-The following is the Bar Graph presenting the year-wise Turnover percentages of each department (2020-2023). It has a graphical display of the turnover rates by department making it less time consuming to determine departments with high or little turnover in the previous years.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) New PSE Sourcing Essentials ROSHN Syndicate Cohort
This report makes use of the case study of ROSHN — Saudi Arabia’s leading real estate developer having the responsibilities of delivering quality homes.
ROSNH plays an important role in the organization of construction activity in KSA and currently owns more than sixty percent in the market of residence construction.
The key findings evidence that procurement practices of the organization are orderly with keen emphasis on the relationship it has with the suppliers so as to deliver construction materials in the shortest times and most efficient costs possible.
The key findings evidence that an effective sourcing approaches will work to strengthen ROSHN’s procurement systems, minimize supply-chain vulnerabilities, and centralize costs for the organisation while offering the organization compliance with burgeoning sustainability shifts in the constructions industry.
The following paper assesses the current sourcing initiatives and provides several critical suggestions that can strengthen procurement and supply chain.
The key recommendations arising from this analysis include:
- ROSHN should incorporate Porter’s Five Forces and PESTLE analysis into the organization’s Vendor Management Team (VMT)
- The expansion of the approved list of suppliers by not less than fifteen percent in the course of the next year is vital in eliminating reliance on a few suppliers.
- Improving eSourcing tools especially eAuctions to apply competitive pressures and lower costs of procurement. This will solve the problem of inefficiency in the tendering process and increase transparency while RHOSN already has efficient technology solutions for engaging suppliers.
- Obligatory implementation of a supplier sustainability program that identifies suppliers with high levels of CS
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_5HR02_22_01 5HR02 Talent management and workforce planning
(Solution) CIPS Supply Chain Analysis Methods
(Solution) New CIPS Sourcing Essentials (PSE) TAQA Water Solutions
This report evaluates and contrasts various sourcing strategies within the SWS (Sustainable Water Solution) organisation, focusing on the health and safety (HS&E) category of spend during the COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitated remote working.
To assess the different sourcing strategies, tools such as the Kraljic analysis, Mendelow's stakeholder analysis, the business hierarchy of needs, and the SWOT analysis were employed.
Additionally, the Peter Block Grid was used to categorise stakeholders based on their interests and positions related to the sourcing strategies.
In the supplier evaluation for the HS&E category of spend within SWS, Carter's 10Cs methodology was applied to assess different sourcing strategies.
The results indicate that SWS should adopt a strategic sourcing approach to sustain its leadership in the sustainability and water management industry while maximising efficiency.
The sourcing strategies include multiple sourcing (engaging with multiple suppliers), single sourcing (working with one supplier), sole sourcing (working with a monopolistic supplier), and dual sourcing (working with two suppliers who might have conflicting demands).
In conclusion, the recommendations for SWS's sourcing strategies in the HS&E category of spend are as follows:
- Determine the most suitable sourcing strategy based on the characteristics of the spend category.
- Ensure procurement policies are comprehensive and prioritize health and safety standards.
- Simplify the procurement process while considering the interests of all stakeholders.
- Upgrade the current Ariba/SAP system to enhance information flow and support various sourcing methods such as RFQ, RFP, negotiation, and e-auction throughout the product lifecycle