Description
Solution
SECTION 2
1.4 Data Analysis
To calculate the percentage turnover for each department, I used the formula:
Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Leavers) ×100
2020
- Administration: 4/22×100=18.2%
- Maintenance: 5/9×100=55.6%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 70/231×100=30.3%
- People Team: 1/6×100=16.7%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 19/42×100=45.2%
- Packing & Dispatch: 21/36×100=58.3%
- Finance: 2/5×100=40%
2021
- Administration: 8/20×100=40%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 3/2198×100=16.2%
- People Team: 0/6×100=0%
- Research & Design: 0/3×100=0%
- Sales: 3/35×100=8.6%
- Packing & Despatch: 6/15×100=40%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2022
- Administration: 9/20×100=45%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 1/4×100=25%
- Production: 3/8178×100=21.3%
- People Team: 3/6×100=50%
- Research & Design: 0/4×100=0%
- Sales: 0/40×100=0%
- Packing & Despatch: 8/16×100=50%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2023
- Administration: 2/18×100=11.1%
- Maintenance: 1/7×100=14.3%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 29/181×100=16%
- People Team: 2/5×100=40%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 2/45×100=4.4%
- Packing & Despatch: 3/15×100=20%
- Finance: 0/3×100=0%
To calculate the overall turnover rate for the entire organization each year, we sum the total number of leavers and total employees, then apply the turnover formula:
Overall Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Total Leavers) ×100
2020:
- Total employees = 359
- Total leavers = 123
- Turnover: 123359×100=34.3%
2021:
- Total employees = 285
- Total leavers = 52
- Turnover: 52285×100=18.2%
2022:
- Total employees = 275
- Total leavers = 62
- Turnover: 62275×100=22.5%
2023:
- Total employees = 282
- Total leavers = 40
- Turnover: 40282×100=14.2%
Data Presentation
- Bar Graph-The following is the Bar Graph presenting the year-wise Turnover percentages of each department (2020-2023). It has a graphical display of the turnover rates by department making it less time consuming to determine departments with high or little turnover in the previous years.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS PIN Effective Negotiation ROSHN Syndicate Cohort 1
The purpose of this report was to develop a commercial negotiation plan. This plan is applicable by the organisation in the identified spend category.
In this context of the assessment, ROSHN, one of the leading Saudi Arabian real estate development companies in line with the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 has been used successfully.
The key findings in this report evidence that the mission of ROSHN is to meet housing needs and have made it their goal to build 70% homes for Saudi families within the year 2030.
Another key finding is that procurement division the Vendor Management Team (VMT) and Commercial Procurement Team provides timely delivery of resources for housing projects at HDB.
The major findings in this assessment also evidence that Mendelow’s Matrix, PESTLED analysis, and Kraljic Matrix are all components of Roshn’s main strategic procurement cycle, which also places a focus on Principled negotiations when it comes to procuring for necessary resources.
Another main finding is that, as it can be seen from the above discussion, most of the choices made by ROSHN in procurement positively influence its procuring activities regarding its strategy and Vision 2030 objectives.
Nonetheless, there are opportunities for improvement about supplier analysis, risk management, stakeholder management, and the tracking of concessions, which would provide greater negotiating power and procurement performance.
Based on these key findings and generated conclusions, a set of recommendations have been generated which are relevant in this report which entail;
- Ensure that supplier evaluations reflect Vision 2030 by using innovation, sustainability, and sound supplier financials.
- Prepare a detailed risk management plan on sourcing with special reference to using alternate sources as well as pre-screened backups to replace regular suppliers.
- Improve contact with negative factors that affect company regulations.
- Evaluate the factors prevailing in the market to get better negotiation power from the supplier.
- Increase specific characteristics, for example, supplier reliability which contain qualitative elements.
(Solution) Marketing Mix (4Ps)
(Solution) 7CO03 Learning Plan Ethical standpoints on people practice and the maintenance of high standards of ethical behaviour
(Solution) CIPD AVADO_5OS01_24_06 5OS01 – Specialist Employment Law
(Solution) CIPS Module: Global Strategic Supply Chain Management
- In this assessment, the focus has been on evaluating global strategic approach for WoodPlc supply chain identified. The relevance of this is informed by assumption that supply chain is anchored on the need to influence changes in market in supply chain practices. This is while sustainable global sourcing strategies being used.
- The findings evidence strategic logistical impact of an organisation and supply chain management process has an impact on corporate performance. The different tools and techniques which have been applied inform on the best practice of the organisation operations.
- For WoodPlc organisation working in oil and gas contracting sector in UAE, reviewing of their supply chain is used by use of best practice in their practice. Also, an identification of entire risks, issues incurred and opportunities evident.
- The findings in this report evidence different challenges as affecting collaboration. This assessment recommend need for Improving collaboration, network-based practice and innovativeness to ensure they embrace sustainability in supply chain
- Today, WoodPlc has been identified as lacking appropriate continuous development strategy for all stakeholders and end-users of their operations. Improving supply chain development through an increased chances for learning
- In WoodPlc, they are encountering immense transitioning from modern supply chain and use of technologies. There is a need to manage all the supply chain relations. This is for the Conflicts management in entire supply chain relations to ensure stakeholders are involved and part of the implementation of the practice
- In this report, it has been concluded on the existing challenges in their tiers. To manage the challenges identified from the Porters 5 forces analysis, there is a need to introduce end-to-end supply chain for their overall demands which capture various tiers for including all operations. This is to guarantee a successful management of the overall supply chain and performance management issues