Description
Solution
SECTION 2
1.4 Data Analysis
To calculate the percentage turnover for each department, I used the formula:
Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Leavers) ×100
2020
- Administration: 4/22×100=18.2%
- Maintenance: 5/9×100=55.6%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 70/231×100=30.3%
- People Team: 1/6×100=16.7%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 19/42×100=45.2%
- Packing & Dispatch: 21/36×100=58.3%
- Finance: 2/5×100=40%
2021
- Administration: 8/20×100=40%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 3/2198×100=16.2%
- People Team: 0/6×100=0%
- Research & Design: 0/3×100=0%
- Sales: 3/35×100=8.6%
- Packing & Despatch: 6/15×100=40%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2022
- Administration: 9/20×100=45%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 1/4×100=25%
- Production: 3/8178×100=21.3%
- People Team: 3/6×100=50%
- Research & Design: 0/4×100=0%
- Sales: 0/40×100=0%
- Packing & Despatch: 8/16×100=50%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2023
- Administration: 2/18×100=11.1%
- Maintenance: 1/7×100=14.3%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 29/181×100=16%
- People Team: 2/5×100=40%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 2/45×100=4.4%
- Packing & Despatch: 3/15×100=20%
- Finance: 0/3×100=0%
To calculate the overall turnover rate for the entire organization each year, we sum the total number of leavers and total employees, then apply the turnover formula:
Overall Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Total Leavers) ×100
2020:
- Total employees = 359
- Total leavers = 123
- Turnover: 123359×100=34.3%
2021:
- Total employees = 285
- Total leavers = 52
- Turnover: 52285×100=18.2%
2022:
- Total employees = 275
- Total leavers = 62
- Turnover: 62275×100=22.5%
2023:
- Total employees = 282
- Total leavers = 40
- Turnover: 40282×100=14.2%
Data Presentation
- Bar Graph-The following is the Bar Graph presenting the year-wise Turnover percentages of each department (2020-2023). It has a graphical display of the turnover rates by department making it less time consuming to determine departments with high or little turnover in the previous years.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) Level 7 7C003 Appendix B – Task one template – initial self assessment and learning plan
(Solution) CIPD Level 5 Oakwood 5CO02 Evidence-based practice
(Solution) CIPS Red Sea Global Module: Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply (PDC)
In this assessment of developing contracts in procurement and supply, a focus on an identified contract in Red Sea Global (RSG) has critically been evaluated.
The explanation focuses on how the terms and conditions assist the organisation in ensuring effective management of risks of poor quality, extension of time, increased costs and unethical practice.
Also, the role of terms and conditions in ensuring the relevant performance measures monitoring and management are put into account. RSG organisation is classified as a highly visionary developer fully owned by Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia considered.
To achieve the intended aim of this assessment, the focus is on Convertible Construction Contract with the terms and conditions selected being general and used in various construction categories in the organisation.
From the evaluation of the contract terms and conditions, the obtained findings indicate that the contract terms and conditions are detailed and used to guide success of procurement and supply.
The terms and conditions guarantee P&SM success in managing the risks of quality, time, costs overruns and ethics. They are classified to categories of risks management, Force Majeure, Costs management, Indemnity, Insurance and performance.
Also, with PS&M working in collaboration with other different departments in the organisation (HR, Accounts, Finance, Legal and IT), cumulative success is guaranteed. This is through delivery of different projects enhancing well-being of clients, community and environment.
Also, an outline of “battle of the forms” concept has been carried out with a detailed explanation on scope of ensuring all agreements are pursued and integrated in RSG terms and conditions successfully. The best practice of managing the issue has been evident.
There are different gaps identified from the findings and conclusions in this assessment. To manage these gaps, the recommendations are;
- A review of risks management approach integrated to the terms and conditions
- Develop a clear approach for agreement with different suppliers for managing “battle of the forms”
- To use various KPI’s and reports to implement contracts
- To reconstitute how innovation and technologies are included in implementing contracts
- To enhance scope of understanding and awareness regarding the contract terms and conditions
(Solution) Question 3- Leadership Style in Sunmark Bank good at moment or not
(Solution) CIPS APGM Innovative Measures for Improving Supply Chain
(Solution) CIPS New Saudi Aramco Driving Value Through Procurement & Supply; Managing Expenditures with Suppliers
In this first project in Corporate Award Program, the focus has been on role of procurement supply and management (PS&M) responsibility in achieving value for money outcomes. This is through the focus on Saudi Aramco third party logistics spend category.
Also, a review on the current approaches to management of prices and costs for the third party logistics spend category has been identified.
This is by using different data and information from contracts management, procurement, commercial-driven development, strategic sourcing and PS&M practices.
Also, different models have been used including Mendelow, Kraljic matrix, Porter’s 5 forces, STEEPLED and Suppliers Preferencing model.
The key findings obtained in this project include the view that Saudi Aramco engage multiple stakeholders for successful practice.
Also, the key findings evidence their market environment as competitive hence success in achieving value for money outcomes.
The organisation strategy of achieving value for money outcomes has similarly been identified. This is with its pros and cons enhancing or limiting a successful implementation established.
From the findings and conclusions, various recommendations have been generated which include;
- An in-depth evaluation of positioning of all stakeholders for accommodating their interests in their operations
- In third party logistics, they can involve multiple sourcing to be competitive hence value for money
- To involve different specialists for gaining awareness on improving value for money
- Review of budget in sourcing third party logistics with technology involved in sourcing process.