Description
Solution
SECTION 2
1.4 Data Analysis
To calculate the percentage turnover for each department, I used the formula:
Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Leavers) ×100
2020
- Administration: 4/22×100=18.2%
- Maintenance: 5/9×100=55.6%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 70/231×100=30.3%
- People Team: 1/6×100=16.7%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 19/42×100=45.2%
- Packing & Dispatch: 21/36×100=58.3%
- Finance: 2/5×100=40%
2021
- Administration: 8/20×100=40%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 3/2198×100=16.2%
- People Team: 0/6×100=0%
- Research & Design: 0/3×100=0%
- Sales: 3/35×100=8.6%
- Packing & Despatch: 6/15×100=40%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2022
- Administration: 9/20×100=45%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 1/4×100=25%
- Production: 3/8178×100=21.3%
- People Team: 3/6×100=50%
- Research & Design: 0/4×100=0%
- Sales: 0/40×100=0%
- Packing & Despatch: 8/16×100=50%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2023
- Administration: 2/18×100=11.1%
- Maintenance: 1/7×100=14.3%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 29/181×100=16%
- People Team: 2/5×100=40%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 2/45×100=4.4%
- Packing & Despatch: 3/15×100=20%
- Finance: 0/3×100=0%
To calculate the overall turnover rate for the entire organization each year, we sum the total number of leavers and total employees, then apply the turnover formula:
Overall Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Total Leavers) ×100
2020:
- Total employees = 359
- Total leavers = 123
- Turnover: 123359×100=34.3%
2021:
- Total employees = 285
- Total leavers = 52
- Turnover: 52285×100=18.2%
2022:
- Total employees = 275
- Total leavers = 62
- Turnover: 62275×100=22.5%
2023:
- Total employees = 282
- Total leavers = 40
- Turnover: 40282×100=14.2%
Data Presentation
- Bar Graph-The following is the Bar Graph presenting the year-wise Turnover percentages of each department (2020-2023). It has a graphical display of the turnover rates by department making it less time consuming to determine departments with high or little turnover in the previous years.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) ICS Learn CIPD Level 5 Reward for Performance and Contribution (5HR03)
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_7HR01_24_01 7HR01 Strategic employment relations
(Solution) CIPS Contracting Excellence in Procurement and Supply (APCE) Assessment
- In this assessment, the contractual terms which is used by Emirates Transport (ET) Company has been evaluated.
- The contract terms and conditions have been evaluated in terms of their power and risk distribution among the suppliers and the organisation.
- In order to achieve the evaluation in this report, the areas of interest include force majeure, variation of disputes, pay level, warrant and liability and termination.
- By using different tools and models, the findings in this report evidence the scope in which ET has made investments in power balance and risks management for successful contract management. This is evidenced by for instance the scope of disputes management.
- Further, the findings evidence that the terms and conditions used by ET offer an elaborate guide on relevance of the legal factors for the organisations operations in UAE and in specific Dubai.
(Solution) CIPS Sourcing Essentials (PSE) Saudi Aramco
Executive Summary
This assessment focuses on evaluating the various sourcing approaches applicable in Procurement and Supply Management (PS&M) for modern organisations. The organisation of focus is Saudi Aramco in their Third Party Logistics (3PL) spend area. Evaluation of the various sourcing approaches has been informed by a review of the internal data/documentation available, models of CIPS and module contents. The key findings in this report is that the preference in Saudi Aramco in sourcing of the 3PL spend area is the multiple sourcing. The choice is identified in the key findings as being informed by immense competition in their market. Also, the sole and single sourcing approaches are also a preference in an event the supplier exist in solitary with their involvement informed by varying organisation demands. Additionally, the key findings evidence single sourcing as being preferred when despite of multiple suppliers in place, the preference is only for one. This is while the dual sourcing being adopted in an event the various methods/choices in sourcing are used and prioritised. Eventually, by embrace of supplier appraisal tool, the 3PL sourcing in Saudi Aramco has been generated. The overall outcome of the appraisal process by embrace of Carter’s 10C’s note successful organisation is guided by successful value for money outcomes and improving market growth in oil and gas sector.
Considering the key findings and conclusions made in this assessment, a set of limitations and gaps have been generated which could be managed through a set of recommendations including;
- Pursue detailed internal and external analysis process for identifying best sourcing approach
- Introduction of a more detailed sourcing appraisal process by PS&M
- Focusing on management of success in sourcing approach defining the policy and operations of Saudi Aramco in 3PL sourcing
- Inclusion of all stakeholders in their practice for successful sourcing process
- Implement capacity development strategy for PS&M detailed appreciation of importance of various sourcing approaches