Description
Solution
SECTION 2
1.4 Data Analysis
To calculate the percentage turnover for each department, I used the formula:
Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Leavers) ×100
2020
- Administration: 4/22×100=18.2%
- Maintenance: 5/9×100=55.6%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 70/231×100=30.3%
- People Team: 1/6×100=16.7%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 19/42×100=45.2%
- Packing & Dispatch: 21/36×100=58.3%
- Finance: 2/5×100=40%
2021
- Administration: 8/20×100=40%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 3/2198×100=16.2%
- People Team: 0/6×100=0%
- Research & Design: 0/3×100=0%
- Sales: 3/35×100=8.6%
- Packing & Despatch: 6/15×100=40%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2022
- Administration: 9/20×100=45%
- Maintenance: 3/8×100=37.5%
- Marketing: 1/4×100=25%
- Production: 3/8178×100=21.3%
- People Team: 3/6×100=50%
- Research & Design: 0/4×100=0%
- Sales: 0/40×100=0%
- Packing & Despatch: 8/16×100=50%
- Finance: 0/4×100=0%
2023
- Administration: 2/18×100=11.1%
- Maintenance: 1/7×100=14.3%
- Marketing: 0/4×100=0%
- Production: 29/181×100=16%
- People Team: 2/5×100=40%
- Research & Design: 1/4×100=25%
- Sales: 2/45×100=4.4%
- Packing & Despatch: 3/15×100=20%
- Finance: 0/3×100=0%
To calculate the overall turnover rate for the entire organization each year, we sum the total number of leavers and total employees, then apply the turnover formula:
Overall Turnover Percentage= (Total Employees/Total Leavers) ×100
2020:
- Total employees = 359
- Total leavers = 123
- Turnover: 123359×100=34.3%
2021:
- Total employees = 285
- Total leavers = 52
- Turnover: 52285×100=18.2%
2022:
- Total employees = 275
- Total leavers = 62
- Turnover: 62275×100=22.5%
2023:
- Total employees = 282
- Total leavers = 40
- Turnover: 40282×100=14.2%
Data Presentation
- Bar Graph-The following is the Bar Graph presenting the year-wise Turnover percentages of each department (2020-2023). It has a graphical display of the turnover rates by department making it less time consuming to determine departments with high or little turnover in the previous years.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS Advanced Practitioner Award APGCE
In this second assignment in Advanced Practitioner Award, a business report which evaluate global commercial strategy has been developed. This evaluation focuses on Hertfordshire and West Essex (H&WE) NHS organisation. The rationale of this evaluation is informed by the fact that an organisation strategy guides an organisation success in achieving a competitive advantage and dominating their market of operations. The areas of focus in this report include relationship of strategy and corporate, business and functional structures, methods used to analyse supply chain, managing resources for supporting development and implementation of strategy and how costs and finance could impact on supply chain. Through the application of different CIPS Models and techniques (Mendelow Matrix, PESTLE Generic Analysis tool, and risks register), various findings were obtained. These include support of existence of a direct correlation of strategy, corporate, functional structures and business practice. In analysis of supply chain, predictive and descriptive approaches which are quantitative and qualitative identified as relevant for the evaluation. Also, by ensuring all relevant stakeholders are engaged in the process, successful costs management and supply chain analysis identified. Hence, these findings indicate that by Hertfordshire and West Essex (H&WE) NHS operating a global corporate strategy, they would lower their costs overruns, profits acquired and dominate their industry. These findings are aligned with the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) influencing contract management process and supply chain.
Finally, from the findings and conclusions in this report, various limitations have been identified which can be managed through the following recommendations;
- Hertfordshire and West Essex (H&WE) NHS need to prioritise on investing on technologies for improving analysis of the relationships and corporate strategy achievement
- In supply chain analysis, open book pricing also characterised with flexibility influencing scope of collaboration and suppliers partnering hence an improved practice
- Engage Procurement and Supply Chain Management (PS&M) successfully since they are engaged to predict and satisfy customers’ needs
- Consistently updating their supply chain networks informed by different risks
(Solution) FINM036 Financial Decision Making
(Solution) New PSE Sourcing Essentials ROSHN Syndicate Cohort
This report makes use of the case study of ROSHN — Saudi Arabia’s leading real estate developer having the responsibilities of delivering quality homes.
ROSNH plays an important role in the organization of construction activity in KSA and currently owns more than sixty percent in the market of residence construction.
The key findings evidence that procurement practices of the organization are orderly with keen emphasis on the relationship it has with the suppliers so as to deliver construction materials in the shortest times and most efficient costs possible.
The key findings evidence that an effective sourcing approaches will work to strengthen ROSHN’s procurement systems, minimize supply-chain vulnerabilities, and centralize costs for the organisation while offering the organization compliance with burgeoning sustainability shifts in the constructions industry.
The following paper assesses the current sourcing initiatives and provides several critical suggestions that can strengthen procurement and supply chain.
The key recommendations arising from this analysis include:
- ROSHN should incorporate Porter’s Five Forces and PESTLE analysis into the organization’s Vendor Management Team (VMT)
- The expansion of the approved list of suppliers by not less than fifteen percent in the course of the next year is vital in eliminating reliance on a few suppliers.
- Improving eSourcing tools especially eAuctions to apply competitive pressures and lower costs of procurement. This will solve the problem of inefficiency in the tendering process and increase transparency while RHOSN already has efficient technology solutions for engaging suppliers.
- Obligatory implementation of a supplier sustainability program that identifies suppliers with high levels of CS