Description
Solution
Email 5: 3.1 Changing an Employee’s Contract Lawfully
Changing an employee’s contract lawfully requires careful adherence to employment law principles to avoid potential claims, such as constructive dismissal. Variations such as working hours should be communicated openly and performed only when there is a consensus or at the discretion of a sound flexibility clause.
Flexibility Clauses:
Some contracts include flexibility clauses allowing employers to make certain changes, such as adjusting working hours as evidenced by ACAS (2023b). However, these clauses need to be clearly stated and for good reason and each party must not use the clause against the other party in bad faith. Thus, unconditional clauses such as ‘hours may vary as required’, is not a sufficient reason to change them arbitrarily or excessively. For example, in United Bank Ltd v. Akhtar (1989), the court stated that even if the parties contain flexibility clauses, changes must be exercised reasonably so as not to frustrate the contract of good faith (Croneri, 2023).
Constructive Dismissal Claims
Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee resigns due to the employer’s fundamental breach of contract, such as making significant changes to working hours without agreement or reasonable justification (ACAS, 2022). For a claim to succeed, the employee must show:
- A breach of contract (explicit or implied terms, such as trust and confidence).
- The breach was serious enough to justify resignation.
- They resigned promptly following the breach.
Regarding working hours, the claimant may allege that a working hour change was sudden or unfair and that increase causes undue hardship. For instance,…..
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 7C002 Question 1: Wellbeing Strategies benefit Stakeholders within an organisation
Payment Link
(Solution) MSc Human Resource Management and Training MN7650 Managing Change and Technology at Work
(Solution) New PSE Sourcing Essentials ROSHN Syndicate Cohort
- ROSHN should incorporate Porter’s Five Forces and PESTLE analysis into the organization’s Vendor Management Team (VMT)
- The expansion of the approved list of suppliers by not less than fifteen percent in the course of the next year is vital in eliminating reliance on a few suppliers.
- Improving eSourcing tools especially eAuctions to apply competitive pressures and lower costs of procurement. This will solve the problem of inefficiency in the tendering process and increase transparency while RHOSN already has efficient technology solutions for engaging suppliers.
- Obligatory implementation of a supplier sustainability program that identifies suppliers with high levels of CS