Description
Solution
Task Two – Report Section Two
Explain the legislative requirements that impact reward practice. (AC 2.4)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section.Word count: Approximately 300 words
|
Equality Act 2010
In order to prohibit any type of prejudice when awarding people, the Equality Act of 2010 might be used to reward practices. Employers are prohibited by law from discriminating against their employees’ wages, benefits, or work terms and conditions based on their sexual orientation, gender, race, handicap, or any other protected trait (Acas, 2023). The Equal Pay Act of 2010 also addresses the issue of how much men and women ought to be paid. For instance, GA Pensions must compensate men and women performing comparable employment or work of equivalent worth equally in order to maintain equity in rewards. These consist of equal pay, paid holidays, pensions, overtime pay, and paid annual leave. Only when a person’s abilities and credentials are essential for the position can GA Pensions reward men and women who perform comparable work in different ways. National Minimum Wage Act 1998 Employers are required by law to give workers a minimum wage per hour. GA Pensions should be aware that different ages have varied minimum wage requirements and should abide by them to prevent legal claims and accusations of discrimination. Ages 23 and over cost £9.50, Ages 21 to 22 cost £9.18, Ages 18 to 20 cost £6.83, Ages under 18 cost £4.81 and Apprentice cost £4.81 (Acas, 2023). Every set of workers receives a better income that can assist them satisfy their needs thanks to these various wage rates. GA Pensions could be paying more than the going hourly wage, but it shouldn’t be less. Paying workers less than the legal minimum wage will result in a legal risk for the business, making it harder for GA Pensions to find and keep talented staff. CEO Pay Reporting Companies with at least 250 workers in the UK are required by the Corporations (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 to declare the split between the CEO’s pay and the pay of full-time employees (Cotton, 2022). This is true of the CEO and employee pay structures of GA Pensions. The ratio of employee compensation to CEO compensation should be made public by GA Pensions. A report on changes in the CEO disclosure ratio and the metrics used to compute the ratio should also be included in GA Pensions. GA Pensions’s dedication to justice and fairness might be demonstrated by a lower CEO Pay ratio.
|
Please click the icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 5HR03 (AC3.1) Assess the business context of the reward environment
(Solution) CIPS Strategic Supply Chain Management APSS
- The supply chain mapping for an organisation spend category is influenced by several elements, among them environmental scanning to identify the micro and macro factors.
- Other aspects considered in the mapping are the facilities, location, and time.
- In the implementation process, it involves making suitable changes and adding value to the process.
- Drawing from the STEEPLE, Porter’s five forces, SWOT analysis, and Kraljic matrix, some of the key elements are the relationship with the vendors, consideration of various competitors, and ensuring customised category of spend.
- Quality and timely delivery of the spend category is also an important consideration area.
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.