(Solution) CIPD 5HR02 (AC2.2) Evaluate the techniques used to support the process of workforce planning
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
| (AC2.2) Evaluate the techniques used to support the process of workforce planning.
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 400 words |
| The 9-Box Grid
The 9-box grid is a workforce planning tool used to assess employee performance or potential, supporting strategic workforce planning (Vulpen, 2025). It works by providing a visual framework to identify the high performing and high potential employees to allow tailored development and succession planning. One major advantage of the 9-box grid is that it allows to focus on investing into the key talent, which is so important for retention and leadership continuity (Tapi, 2024). However, its reliance on subjective measures introduces bias into the results, reducing the reliability. Additionally, implementing the 9-box grid involves much time and resources needed to gather and effectively analyse data (Symonds & McBrayer, 2024). The grid helps in aligning the capabilities of the employee with organisational goals, but it is not a complete solution to more wide-reaching workforce issues. Its shortcomings underscore the importance of integrating other tools to best achieve the intended outcomes. Contingency Planning Contingency planning is a strategic method of preparing an organisation for workforce disruption through developing responses to potential risks such as labour shortages, economic downturns and sudden absence (Tristancho, 2024). One key advantage is the ability to maintain continuity of operation and thereby limit the severity of delays to services and hence satisfaction of customers. Moreover, it is clear and credible for stakeholders and showcases preparedness. However, contingency planning has limitations. It is resource intensive and involves extensive scenario analysis and frequent updates to keep pace with shifting labour markets. Furthermore, excessive preparation for unlikely scenarios may also shift focus from current organisation’s priorities, thus causing inefficiency (Leonard, 2024). However, its critical and proactive approach to risk management ensures that organisations like ParcelCare, which depends on consistent service delivery are able to plan its workforce effectively. By getting ahead of uncertainties, contingency planning reduces likelihood of potential workforce related crisis, boost resilience and bring stability. Brief Judgement The most useful tool for ParcelCare is the 9-box grid, which focuses on internal workforce optimisation, and also determines high potential employees for leadership positions and future development. By doing so, it guarantees talent continuity and is in line with ParcelCare’s strategic objective to further improve retention and succession planning. While it does not address the need for immediate disruptions, focusing on productive employee development makes it essential for building a resilient workforce ready for potential challenges.
|
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD 7HR02 Contemporary Methods that Utilise Technology to Manage Individual and Team Performance
(Solution) CIPD 5C002 ways that Technivara could measure financial and non-financial performance
(Solution) Principles of Marketing Market Segmentation & Targeting
(Solution) CIPS Sourcing Essentials (PSE) Saudi Aramco
- Pursue detailed internal and external analysis process for identifying best sourcing approach
- Introduction of a more detailed sourcing appraisal process by PS&M
- Focusing on management of success in sourcing approach defining the policy and operations of Saudi Aramco in 3PL sourcing
- Inclusion of all stakeholders in their practice for successful sourcing process
- Implement capacity development strategy for PS&M detailed appreciation of importance of various sourcing approaches
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.