(Solution) 7HR03 concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits and recommendations
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
7HR03 Strategic reward management
Question 2 (AC 2.4) Evaluate the concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits, recommending which approach would be most suited to the organisational context. Justify your recommendations.
Question 2 (AC 2.4)- 1,016 Words
Evaluating the Concept of Universal Benefits
Balkin & Werner (2023) define universal benefits as benefits which are provided to all employees, such as regular pay rises, job security and health schemes, regardless of their role, seniority or personal circumstances. These universal benefits are not discriminatory to any employee on the grounds of either their gender or skills. The employes are benefitting mainly from the universal rewards since they are not discriminatory to the employees due to possession of protected characteristics. Perkins et al. (2021) assert that employing this approach enables organisations to ensure fairness and consistency, promoting equality among all individuals in the organisation. The predictability and simplicity of universal benefits is one of the primary advantages of this type of program. With all employees receiving the same package, administrative efficiency is improved and HR complexity and costs reduced (Reed et al., 2023). This structure also enables a strong employer brand by making employees believe the organisation is fair and transparent. It also ensures labour law and industry standard compliance, and reduces likelihood of disputes pertaining to benefit allocations (Sheppard-Jones et al., 2021). In addition, universal benefits can also be an effective way of boosting employee morale and engagement, especially if they include provisions like healthcare, pensions, and paid leave. Knowing that the organisation provides comprehensive support makes employees feel valued (Sokolov & Zavyalova, 2020). Additionally, it can be immensely useful in industries where job demands are similar for majority of employees, including aviation where workers face uniform challenges like irregular working hours (Dang et al., 2021).
However, one disadvantage of universal benefits is the lack of flexibility. A standardised package cannot accommodate various employees’ financial, family, and career-related preferences and needs (Andriani, 2022). For instance, younger employees may prefer professional development subsidies over enhanced pension contributions, whereas older employees may prioritise retirement benefits. An additional limitation is that universal benefits may not be competitive in attracting top talent. Fenny et al. (2021) mention that if competitors are able to customise benefits, Riyadh Air runs the risk of losing capable staff to companies that have customised their compensation plans. Also, inefficiencies occurs when employees are not taking full advantage of the benefits that are provided, resulting in wasted resources (Kant & Asefa, 2022). Rigid universal systems may not meet diverse needs of Riyadh Air, with……
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 5HR02 Talent management and workforce planning Assessment ID / CIPD_5HR02_22_01
(Solution) Oakwood International 5CO02 Evidence-based practice Assessment ID / CIPD_5CO02_23_01
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC Sustainable global sourcing decisions
(Solution) CIPD 5HR03 Task Two – Report Section Two
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Sourcing Essentials- PSE
- In this report, the area of focus is on different sourcing approaches which can be used in procurement and supply management (PS&M) in contemporary business environment. This is through the focus of ROSHN organisation in Design Building category of spend.
- To achieve the intended aim of this report, data has been sourced from the organisation internal documents, different CIPS modules and models (Mendelow, STEEPLE and Kraljic). The key findings include ROSHN prefeed approach being multiple sourcing owing to the high-level of market competitiveness. This is with sole and single approaches preferred when only one supplier is being engaged owing to differences in organisation needs.
- Also, the findings evidence that single sourcing prevail in an event many suppliers are available, but an organisation decides to go for one. Another finding in this report is that dual sourcing is used when different methods/options for sourcing are embraced and put in place.
- Finally, through the application of supplier appraisal tool, focusing on the Design Building spend area, an evaluation has been put into account. The result from the appraisal using Carter’s 10C’s evidence organisation success to achieve value for money outcomes and improved market development.
- Internal and external analysis to identify most appropriate sourcing strategy
- Broad sourcing appraisal strategy need to be introduced
- Focus on managing successful sourcing strategy as part of organisation policy and practices
- Involve more stakeholders as part of their operations for success in sourcing strategy
- Pursuing capacity development initiatives for PS&M understanding of relevance of different PS&M