(Solution) 7HR03 concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits and recommendations
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
7HR03 Strategic reward management
Question 2 (AC 2.4) Evaluate the concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits, recommending which approach would be most suited to the organisational context. Justify your recommendations.
Question 2 (AC 2.4)- 1,016 Words
Evaluating the Concept of Universal Benefits
Balkin & Werner (2023) define universal benefits as benefits which are provided to all employees, such as regular pay rises, job security and health schemes, regardless of their role, seniority or personal circumstances. These universal benefits are not discriminatory to any employee on the grounds of either their gender or skills. The employes are benefitting mainly from the universal rewards since they are not discriminatory to the employees due to possession of protected characteristics. Perkins et al. (2021) assert that employing this approach enables organisations to ensure fairness and consistency, promoting equality among all individuals in the organisation. The predictability and simplicity of universal benefits is one of the primary advantages of this type of program. With all employees receiving the same package, administrative efficiency is improved and HR complexity and costs reduced (Reed et al., 2023). This structure also enables a strong employer brand by making employees believe the organisation is fair and transparent. It also ensures labour law and industry standard compliance, and reduces likelihood of disputes pertaining to benefit allocations (Sheppard-Jones et al., 2021). In addition, universal benefits can also be an effective way of boosting employee morale and engagement, especially if they include provisions like healthcare, pensions, and paid leave. Knowing that the organisation provides comprehensive support makes employees feel valued (Sokolov & Zavyalova, 2020). Additionally, it can be immensely useful in industries where job demands are similar for majority of employees, including aviation where workers face uniform challenges like irregular working hours (Dang et al., 2021).
However, one disadvantage of universal benefits is the lack of flexibility. A standardised package cannot accommodate various employees’ financial, family, and career-related preferences and needs (Andriani, 2022). For instance, younger employees may prefer professional development subsidies over enhanced pension contributions, whereas older employees may prioritise retirement benefits. An additional limitation is that universal benefits may not be competitive in attracting top talent. Fenny et al. (2021) mention that if competitors are able to customise benefits, Riyadh Air runs the risk of losing capable staff to companies that have customised their compensation plans. Also, inefficiencies occurs when employees are not taking full advantage of the benefits that are provided, resulting in wasted resources (Kant & Asefa, 2022). Rigid universal systems may not meet diverse needs of Riyadh Air, with……
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 7C001 True Equal Opportunity Employers Through Formal Measures to Tackle unconscious Bias
(Solution) CIPD Oakwood International 5CO01 Assessment ID / CIPD_5CO01_24_01
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_3CO01_24_01 3CO01 Business, culture and change in context
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC APGCM Module: Contract & Category Management in P&S
- Implement one AI-driven analytics platform by Q4 2024, integrating with existing systems and training staff to enhance forecasting accuracy and negotiate a 10% reduction in supplier costs, led by the IT, procurement, and finance departments. Despite potential initial costs and staff adaptation challenges, this initiative aims to achieve a 15% increase in forecasting accuracy.
- Fully deploy advanced supply chain management software by Q2 2025, partnering with a leading provider and training teams to reduce disruptions by 20%, thus increasing overall supply chain efficiency by 5%. This effort involves collaboration between supply chain management, IT, and vendor management teams, despite initial disruptions and high upfront costs.
- Establish a cross-functional compliance team by Q3 2024 to develop three new policies annually, ensuring 100% compliance with regulations and enhancing reputation metrics by 15%. Led by legal, compliance, and HR departments, this initiative aims to overcome resistance to policy changes and resource-intensive monitoring efforts.
- Implement three financial instruments (futures, options, currency swaps) by Q3 2024, collaborating with financial experts to reduce financial risks by 20% and achieve a 10% increase in financial stability. This effort, led by finance, risk management, and external advisors, addresses potential challenges in market volatility and regulatory constraints.
- Engage multiple suppliers and form five strategic partnerships by Q4 2024, increasing supplier diversity by 30% and improving supply chain reliability metrics by 10%. Led by procurement, vendor management, and supply chain analysts, this initiative aims to mitigate dependency risks and manage supplier relationships effectively. Potential challenges include maintaining consistency in product/service quality across diverse suppliers and increased administrative burden in managing multiple partnerships.
- Conduct market and competitor analyses twice a year starting Q3 2024, aiming to increase procurement cost savings by 15% through better negotiation strategies and timely market insights. This effort, involving procurement, and strategy departments, addresses challenges in data availability and competitive analysis capabilities. Potential challenges include delays in obtaining and analysing market data and difficulty in predicting competitive moves accurately.