Description
Solution
7HR03 Strategic reward management
Question 2 (AC 2.4) Evaluate the concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits, recommending which approach would be most suited to the organisational context. Justify your recommendations.
Question 2 (AC 2.4)- 1,016 Words
Evaluating the Concept of Universal Benefits
Balkin & Werner (2023) define universal benefits as benefits which are provided to all employees, such as regular pay rises, job security and health schemes, regardless of their role, seniority or personal circumstances. These universal benefits are not discriminatory to any employee on the grounds of either their gender or skills. The employes are benefitting mainly from the universal rewards since they are not discriminatory to the employees due to possession of protected characteristics. Perkins et al. (2021) assert that employing this approach enables organisations to ensure fairness and consistency, promoting equality among all individuals in the organisation. The predictability and simplicity of universal benefits is one of the primary advantages of this type of program. With all employees receiving the same package, administrative efficiency is improved and HR complexity and costs reduced (Reed et al., 2023). This structure also enables a strong employer brand by making employees believe the organisation is fair and transparent. It also ensures labour law and industry standard compliance, and reduces likelihood of disputes pertaining to benefit allocations (Sheppard-Jones et al., 2021). In addition, universal benefits can also be an effective way of boosting employee morale and engagement, especially if they include provisions like healthcare, pensions, and paid leave. Knowing that the organisation provides comprehensive support makes employees feel valued (Sokolov & Zavyalova, 2020). Additionally, it can be immensely useful in industries where job demands are similar for majority of employees, including aviation where workers face uniform challenges like irregular working hours (Dang et al., 2021).
However, one disadvantage of universal benefits is the lack of flexibility. A standardised package cannot accommodate various employees’ financial, family, and career-related preferences and needs (Andriani, 2022). For instance, younger employees may prefer professional development subsidies over enhanced pension contributions, whereas older employees may prioritise retirement benefits. An additional limitation is that universal benefits may not be competitive in attracting top talent. Fenny et al. (2021) mention that if competitors are able to customise benefits, Riyadh Air runs the risk of losing capable staff to companies that have customised their compensation plans. Also, inefficiencies occurs when employees are not taking full advantage of the benefits that are provided, resulting in wasted resources (Kant & Asefa, 2022). Rigid universal systems may not meet diverse needs of Riyadh Air, with……
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) Explain factors that need to be considered when managing performance. (AC4.2)
(Solution) (AC2.1) 5HR02 Analyse the impact of effective workforce planning
(Solution) CIPS New Developing Value Through Procurement & Supply; Managing Expenditures with Suppliers (PDV)
- Pursue detailed analysis of stakeholders positioning to ensure overall interests are prioritised
- For catering services, engage different potential suppliers to avoid monopolistic demand and supply hindering competitiveness
- Engage PS&M experts and specialists to acquire knowledge on improving value for money outcomes
- Reviewing budgetary allocation in catering services sourcing and include modernisation of their sourcing
(Solution) 5C003 New (AC2.3) Reflect on your own approach to working inclusively and building positive working relationships with others
(Solution) CIPS PDV Saudi Aramco Market Analysis; Procurement Function Produce Value for Money
(Solution) CIPS Oman Cohort PSE Sourcing Essentials
- This assessment has focused on identifying four sourcing approaches and explaining their application in the category of spend within XXX organisation.
- Based on the different categories selected in sourcing approaches, IT category of spend supplier appraisal has been conducted.
- Through a detailed evaluation, the sourcing approaches identified include multiple, single, dual, and sole.
- For the IT category of spend, multiple sourcing has been selected as the most suitable due to the procurement nature.
- In the Kraljic analysis tool identifying the nature of supplier relationships, IT has been classified as a leverage item.
- The availability of different suppliers in procurement is identified as a multiple sourcing approach.
- A single, dual or sole supplier is not suitable for IT procurement due to its technical and quality specifications required.
- Carter’s 10Cs model has been selected for XXX IT sourcing supplier selection in the supplier selection.