-50%
Awaiting product image
Click to enlarge

(Solution) 7C003 Assess own approaches to decision-making on complex issues, taking ownership to remedy mistakes

New User Gifts

First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.

KaribuCustomer

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.

Payment Methods:

Description

Solution

Learning Outcome 4: Be able to influence others during decision-making while showing courage and conviction.

 

Assessment criterion 12 – Assess own approaches to decision-making on complex issues, taking ownership to remedy mistakes.

 

Handling complex issues; managing risk in decisions; developing these behaviours in others; taking ownership when things go wrong
Starting point Your initial ability (rate yourself on a scale from 0-10 where 0 is no knowledge/skill and 10 is complete knowledge/skill)

 

Initial ability rating: 6

 

Justification for this rating:

In the beginning of my practice working as a people practice professional, I was average in this point when I was rating myself. The rationale of this was that I lacked a holistic capability of ensuring that I harness fairness and transparency in my undertaking successfully.  My ranking was also primarily owing to the changing scope of these complex issues which I face in making decisions and how I am able to remedy the mistakes I make.

I feel that I am in an appropriate position of embracing appropriate decision-making on complex issues, I am able to establish a more conducive work environment in my workplace. Further, by taking ownership to remedying the mistakes, I make sure that there is a harmonious coexistence of the different stakeholders in my organisation and actively in my operations. My experience is since this is found to be in alignment with the personal goals aligned with the organisation strategies and objectives. Being the most appropriate practice, the importance of this is ensuring that the employees are co-ordinately working hard for achieving my organisation goals and objectives which I believe are critical for my practice.
Development objectives To improve my competence within this area I will:

 

a)    To establish the relevant metrics for recognising the employees hard work, progress and achievement as a best practice of building trust of management and employees

b)    To be in a position of classifying areas of my decision making to those which are complex and non-complex

c)     To acquire skills and competencies to be in a position of managing issues which are conflict and would be challenging for my success and also remedying my entire mistakes which I made in the process

 

An example: Build my knowledge within the area of business ethics, with specific focus on how HRM professionals contribute to the development of cultures with high standards of ethics.

 

Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full

Related Papers

-75%
Placeholder

(Solution) 5OS06 (AC1.2) Explain the meanings of ‘leadership development’ and ‘management development’ making a clear distinction between these two functions

Original price was: £ 40.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution Leadership Development Howlett (2020) defines leadership development as a process of improving individual capacity to mobilise and direct others
-80%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPD 7OS05 Effective Management of Talent in International Organisations

Original price was: £ 50.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution 3.1 Effective Management of Talent in International Organisations An active management of talents entail a set of approaches as
-86%
Placeholder

(Solution) New CIPD 5C001: Orgnanisational Performance and Culture in Practice

Original price was: £ 70.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution Table of Contents LO1. 2 1.1 Organisation structures; reasons underpinning. 2 Functional Structure. 2 Divisional Structure. 2 Matrix Structure.
-80%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPS Management of Resources to Support Development and Strategy Implementation

Original price was: £ 50.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution According to Negri et al. (2021), in implementing a corporate strategy, people and capital are prioritised. This is for
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) Sourcing essentials (PSE) Saudi Downtown Company (SDC) Information Technology (IT) systems

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
In this report, an evaluation of various sourcing approaches used in sourcing has been pursued. Through a focus on Saudi Downtown Company (SDC), sourcing of Information Technology (IT) systems post COVID due to popularity of remote working in the different departments has been identified as the spend area. In the evaluation process, different tools including Mendelow Matrix, Kraljic Matrix, SWOT analysis, Hierarchy of need, and Peter Block Grid have been adopted in the analysis. The different sourcing approaches have been identified and their influence for the organisation best practice noted. At the end, by using Cater’s 10C’s tool, supplier appraisal has been carried out for the identified spend area. The findings in this assessment evidence that SDC adopts various sourcing approaches for their different spend categories. There is nevertheless a challenge in embracing strategic sourcing in their operations. Further, the organisation use different sourcing approaches including multiple sourcing, single sourcing, sole sourcing and dual sourcing. All these sourcing approaches are distinct and involved in engagement of different suppliers, only one supplier involved, monopolistic suppliers engaged and suppliers with demands which conflict respectively. In line with the findings and conclusions obtained in this assessment, various recommendations have been suggested for SDC. They include;
  • To select best sourcing approach informed by the characteristics of their spend categories
  • Ensure various legislations and policies are initiated to aid use of technologies and innovation in their sourcing process
  • Implement a fully streamlined PS&M strategy with entire stakeholders interests prioritised
  • Improve information flow and supporting their sourcing strategy by leverage on different approaches (RFQ, RFP and e-Auction) integrated to product lifecycle
 
-67%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPS Assessment 1 PDV- Managing Expenditures with Suppliers

Original price was: £ 30.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
  • In this assessment, by selecting a category of spend, the importance to organisation stakeholders has been provided.
  • The organisation of focus is Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU). Also, by carrying out brief market analysis, an explanation of the extent in which procurement function offer value for money outcomes has been produced.
  • The selected category of spend in RCU is the Information Technology (IT) and cybersecurity. In particular, the IT infrastructure and equipment sub-category of spend has been prioritised for evaluation.
  • In order to achieve this assessment objectives, appropriate purchasing models have been selected for application.
  • These included Mendelow Matrix Analysis, Porter’s 5 Forces, STEEPLE, SWOT analysis and more.