Description
Question
‘Fostering employee wellbeing is good for people and the organisation’. CIPD (2022)
Drawing upon published research, produce a business case that explains how promoting wellbeing
strategies can benefit all stakeholders within an organisation.
Solution
Question 1: Wellbeing Strategies benefit Stakeholders within an organisation
Promotion and support of staff wellbeing is at the core/heart of organisations championing better work and working lives. According to CIPD (2023), an effective wellbeing strategies has a positive implication in delivering mutual-based benefits for people, organisations, economies and communities. The wellbeing strategies means creation of an environment which holistically promote state of contentment benefitting different stakeholders within organisations. To achieve this, CIPD (2023) note that the people practice professionals ought to initiate a holistic framework for supporting employees physical health and safety, mental health and offering sources of help including counselling, employees assistance programs (EAP) and Occupational Health Services based on possibility.
In order to explain how promotion of wellbeing strategies can benefit all stakeholders within an organisation, the business case of Riyad Bank can be put into account. As evidenced in Riyad Bank (2024) the organisation is the leader in community development with a set of consistent input on achievement of sustainable developments. To success in the analysis, Mendelow Matrix tool can be appropriately used.
Figure 1: Categories in the Mendelow Matrix for Stakeholders Analysis
In category A in the figure 1 Mendelow Matrix, this include the customers of Riyad Bank and other end-users of their financial planning, cash management, trade finance, investment banking and brokerage services. In Shinwell and Shamir (2018) report which measures impacts of business on wellbeing and sustainability, appropriate link was generated. The report hypothesised that in organisations creating appropriate wellbeing in organisations impact on customer satisfaction levels. Similarly, for Riyad Bank, by investing in wellbeing strategies, employees would benefit from improved clients retention, positive word-of-mouth and eventually increasing organisation success. These findings are supported by Haverila et al. (2020) evaluating customer satisfaction with provided products and services using Servqual Model. The tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy map are all appropriate predictors of services quality. Further, Astashkina et al. (2018) noted that investing in flexible working strategy as an approach of improving the wellbeing increases customers satisfaction with 75% with the customer lifetime revenues increased with 35%. Hence, by investing in strategies such as flexible working, employees assistance programs, Riyad bank would successfully gain in increased customer satisfaction.
For Category B of stakeholders, this include the employees and people professional department in Riyad Bank. These stakeholders are identified as having high level of interest and low level of power. While identifying employees wellbeing as a holistic approach, CIPD (2023) identify the best practice as informed by unique needs and characteristics of employees and organisation. The report found that appropriate wellbeing initiatives positively increase resilience, improved engagement, less sickness absenteeism and increased performance and productivity. In a specific context, Richemond and Needham (2020) hypothesised that in organisations implementing wellness initiatives, they gain from 67% increased staff satisfaction, 63% increased in financial stability and growth and 50% reduced staff absenteeism. Similarly, for Riyad Bank, Post COVID-19, they have been faced with an increased absenteeism and employees turnover. By investing in wellbeing strategies, unexplained absenteeism would be mitigated, stress leave mitigated and reduced turnover.
Considering Category C,…………..
Please click the icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.