(Solution) 5OS06 (AC1.4) Compare the knowledge, skills and behaviours of leaders and managers in your organisation
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Knowledge Required for Leaders and Managers
Leaders: Leaders at Saudi Aramco need to have a thorough comprehension of global energy markets (CIPD, 2014). In the oil and gas industry, with its complex geopolitical, economic and environmental issues at play, leaders must also understand the changes in the operating climate. This knowledge enables them to make sensible strategic decisions that aid their company to follow the global trends and maintain sustainability and growth long term.
Managers: Aramco’s managers require knowledge about the operational efficiency and resource management. This means understanding of the technical processes, the optimisation of work flows, and the efficient use of personnel and equipment to reach the production targets and maintain the cost effectiveness.
Comparison: Leaders need to know more, in terms of external markets and long-term strategy, while managers need to know more of day to day operations. Leaders have to look globally and strategically, while managers simply manage internal processes. The levels of thinking required for both roles are very different, but both are critical-thinking roles.
Skills Required
Leaders: Strong strategic decision-making skills are required of leaders. This involves analysing complex information into actionable decisions that will define the company’s future direction, particularly in areas like energy transition and sustainability initiatives.
Managers: Due to daily operational issues, managers require strong problem-solving skills (Kotter, 2008). In other words, they must be capable of addressing the production, workforce management and resource allocation problem to achieve smooth and efficient operations.
Comparison: Although both leaders and managers require decision making and problem solving, leaders are concerned with long term, high level strategy, while managers tackle immediate, operational challenges.
Behaviours Required
Leader: A leader is expected to think visionary and addresses the team with a clear picture of the future. The reason for this behaviour is that it motivates employees to do what is good for the company in the long run.
Manager: Accountability from managers is crucial so that they can track their team’s performance against targets and other similar performance parameters like operational standards (Pearce, 2004). It means that they take full responsibility for achieving objectives, for working to very high standards.
Comparison: Leadership focuses on visionary behaviour which is more inspirational and future oriented whereas managers’ behaviour is based on the accountability. Both are critical to organisational success, as leaders set the direction and managers make it happen.
Areas of Improvement
Leaders: Leaders need to improve on their emotional intelligence, so as to understand the emotional dynamics of their teams. This would create a deeper and more effective relationship and communication even in challenging times.
Managers: To delegate more effectively, managers can improve their delegation skills so that they do not undermine team members power. Managers can delegate more responsibilities to their teams, so that they get more time working on employee development and engagement.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Contract Terms and Conditions
- In this assessment, an evaluation of ROSHN company contract terms and conditions have been evaluated.
- By selecting Facilities Management Contract, its effectiveness in ensuring quality issues, time extension risk, costs overruns and unethical practices has been evaluated.
- Further, the importance of performance measures and management in ROSHN company practices has been prioritised for evaluation.
- The contract terms and conditions have been quoted for evidencing the success of the contract implementation.
- In this assessment, the findings evidence that ROSHN facilities management spend category is characterised by various issues which are stipulated by the terms and conditions.
- The relevance of this is ensuring success in managing the overall faced challenges. By reviewing the different terms and conditions, the issues related to performance management, force majeure, costs, indemnity, risk management and insurance have been put into account.
- Also, the battle of forms have been evaluated with the best practice in their management identified.
(Solution) Level 5 5CO02 Assessment ID / CIPD_5CO02_24_01
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Syndicate Cohort 1 Effective Negotiation (PIN)
- To carry out a detailed planning in their negotiation process to ensure entire stakeholders are engaged with their interests given a priority
- A successful inclusion of technology and innovation to harness process of negotiation plan
- To improve documenting of their operations for optimum involvement of all stakeholders and to manage conflicts of interests in negotiation
- To ensure that customised negotiations are pursued in their different spend categories as opposed to using a single negotiation strategy
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.
(Solution) CIPS Advanced Level Commercial Management Assessment
- In summary, this business report has evaluated the global commercial strategy within Eco2Solar organisation. As a best practice of leveraging on competitive advantage and market dominance, organisation strategy has been identified as instrumental.
- The findings of this report indicate that there exist a direct relationship between the strategy and corporate, business, functional structures. This is with various methods which include predictive and descriptive approaches used in the analysis of supply chain.
- By leveraging on various tools such as Pestle generic strategies, Mendelow stakeholders’ analysis and risk register, the need for resources and also stakeholders’ involvement in the commercial strategy has been evaluated.
- This is while managing costs overruns and supply chains managed appropriately.