(Solution) 5CO03 Recognise when and how you would raise matters which conflict with ethical values or legislation. (AC1.4)
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
| Recognise when and how you would raise matters which conflict with ethical values or legislation. (AC1.4)
a) where you consider something to be unethical (whether or not it is illegal), b) where you believe something contravenes legislation
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 350 words
|
| Identifies issue which conflict to legislation
Working in my current organisation, the management had come up with a policy requiring the employees to be based/located in a particular location. This was a policy favourable to local people and the employees/workers based in a particular organisation geographical positioning. This was a policy conflicting with legislations such as Equality Act 2010 which makes it against the law to discriminate people of different ethnicities (Sánchez-Monedero et al., 2020). As part of recruitment and selection, the employees with an interest to apply for a job but found living in different locations were in a disadvantage of being considered. This is a major discrimination which affected the scope of their performance in their roles. The identified policy in my organisation was conflicting with the identified legislation (Equality Act 2010). From a general context, the legislation is used in protecting occurrence of any form of discrimination. A majority of the employees tend to have a disconnect with this policy but with fears of highlighting this issue to the management teams. How to Raise the Issue Considering I was significantly impacted by this policy, I preferred highlighting the issue in an informal manner with employer. At the start, I felt nervous pertaining to highlighting on this issue. However, my employer was ready to resolve issues in workplace promptly with zero consideration of the formal approach. I had a strong confidence to talk to different employers since my workplace has put in place a policy encouraging all people to speak up on the issues impacting them. According to ACAS findings, the informal chats with different employers could be raging from quietly speaking up or use of a well-structured meeting/engagement (ACAS, 2023). After making sure I speak up with all the employers, they made an invitation to me to share an engagement for sharing entire concerns. Considering I was the key individual who had pointed out about the issue, I made preparations which I can note for example explained all people unhappiness with policy and evidencing that this policy was conflicting with legislations and ethical practice. In the verge of this meeting, I made an explanation of the issues which had been faced and making suggestions which explain what need to be pursued. The different alternatives towards highlighting on the issue in workplace entail using different suggestion boxes, survey, employee representatives and whistleblowing. In an event the employees have fears of communicating in a direct manner to their employees, they could prioritise on dropping down a messaging in suggestion boxes, making responses to surveys which are shared and engaging various representatives. The legislation facilitates whistleblowing in an event informal strategies have failed in their roles (Marcum & Young, 2020). Example of unethical issue– Manipulating pay required for reimbursement by an organisation. Breaching ethical code– In my work in MNGHA, post-COVID, the employees were provided with an opportunity for remote working. My organisation had assumed a full charge to facilitate and support the remote working practices. The support scope involved internet connection subscriptions, renewing systems (Microsoft 365 and Zoom). It was expected that the overall costs of operations would substantially increase. A manipulation of what needed to be paid was evident by some of the employee. Taking money by false pretence by the employees is an unethical issue. Procedure to raise the issue · Engaging senior management for a meeting · Documentation of the issues raised in form of bills, suspicion · Harnessing a professional-based approach · Setting the communication approach to be adopted in managing unethical practices
|
| Argue the human and business benefits of people feeling included, valued, and fairly treated at work linking to (two) related theory. (AC2.1)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 400 words
|
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD 5HR03 how policy initiatives and practices are implemented. (AC 1.2)
(Solution) CIPS PIN Negotiation Plan ROSHN Cohort 1 Practitioner
Executive Summary
This assignment talks about the effective negotiation of procurement and supply. It includes at the beginning a brief about ROSHN company and its commercial department and what each function’s role. It also talked about the importance of procurement planning that assists in securing the best deals for the company. In addition to a specific category of spend that is commonly procured within the procurement function. Then it referred to the definition of the negotiation and what are the skills that any negotiator must have. It talked in details about the stages of negotiation and the importance of having a preparation stage, negotiation stage, and a post-contracting stage and what each of these stages include from activities need to be fulfilled in order to have a successful project. Moreover, there has been some information regarding the negotiation process within the approval cycle of procurement and how the negotiation is crucial prior approaching the market with a request for a quotation/proposal and what might impact any negotiation process such as PESTLE and Porter’s Five Forces elements. At the end, there has been some recommendations to enhance the knowledge of the current procurement officer at ROSHN along with nominating CIPS courses for any employee works in the procurement department. This report findings identify negotiation plan in procurement and supply management as essential for achieving value for money outcomes and leveraging in property sector where the organisation has based their operations. Also, this report has found that the Post-COVID global economic recession has elicited a reduction in overall performance of the property sector specifically in the real estate. Therefore, for ROSHN, limited resources have been identified as an issue impacting on the organisation success. This inform on the need for a detailed negotiation amongst the organisation different stakeholders to guarantee their continuity in business. The negotiation plan identified in this report is in alignment with various sourcing strategies, terms and conditions and stakeholder relationship. As part of this integrated report, the obtained findings and conclusions inform on the best practice of developing the negotiation plan. This is by following the phases of preparation, test, propose, bargain, agree and close. In all these identified stages, different tools and techniques can be used with all stakeholders relationships enhanced. Further, for achieving an optimum success in negotiation for design services, ROSHN would manage to achieve BATNA and MLA for best resources to be attained. From the findings and conclusions presented, there are different gaps noted affecting success of the negotiation plan. In order to fill the identified gaps, ROSHN can pursue various recommendations. These recommendations include implementing detailed plans with all stakeholders involved. Also, innovation and technology need to be introduced to be part of their negotiation process and successfully merged. An elaborate documentation is also important to be part of the negotiation plan with any conflict of interest mitigated. Also, depending on ROSHN target in terms of stakeholders, it is important to customise their negotiation plan.(Solution) New CIPD 2024 5HR01- Employment Relationship Management
(Solution) CIPS APGLM Impact of Leadership Approaches on Job Satisfaction
(Solution) CIPS Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply RCU PDC
- This report has focused on evaluating Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU) contract terms and conditions.
- The area of focus in the contract entail its relevance in assisting the management of issues associated with quality, risk of time extension, risk of costs increase and unethical practices impacting the stakeholders.
- Other than this, the performance measures and management in the organisation operations has been put into account.
- For achieving this, RCU operating in the KSA tourism and culture sector has put into account.
- The contract selected is used in most of the services which are sourced by the organisation from different suppliers. This is to define the level of risk and power that each has in the contract implementation.
- Despite of existence of areas of improvement, clauses lacking detail and lack of sufficient protection, the contract terms and conditions are relevant for RCU operations.
- For all the parties and stakeholders involved in a contract implementation, there is a clear risk allocation and management. This is with the performance being measured and monitored based on their interests.
- There is a need for investing in modernised approaches intended to protect the organisation from the battle of the forms.
(Solution) New PSE Sourcing Essentials ROSHN Syndicate Cohort
- ROSHN should incorporate Porter’s Five Forces and PESTLE analysis into the organization’s Vendor Management Team (VMT)
- The expansion of the approved list of suppliers by not less than fifteen percent in the course of the next year is vital in eliminating reliance on a few suppliers.
- Improving eSourcing tools especially eAuctions to apply competitive pressures and lower costs of procurement. This will solve the problem of inefficiency in the tendering process and increase transparency while RHOSN already has efficient technology solutions for engaging suppliers.
- Obligatory implementation of a supplier sustainability program that identifies suppliers with high levels of CS