(Solution) 5CO03 Recognise when and how you would raise matters which conflict with ethical values or legislation. (AC1.4)
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
| Recognise when and how you would raise matters which conflict with ethical values or legislation. (AC1.4)
a) where you consider something to be unethical (whether or not it is illegal), b) where you believe something contravenes legislation
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 350 words
|
| Identifies issue which conflict to legislation
Working in my current organisation, the management had come up with a policy requiring the employees to be based/located in a particular location. This was a policy favourable to local people and the employees/workers based in a particular organisation geographical positioning. This was a policy conflicting with legislations such as Equality Act 2010 which makes it against the law to discriminate people of different ethnicities (Sánchez-Monedero et al., 2020). As part of recruitment and selection, the employees with an interest to apply for a job but found living in different locations were in a disadvantage of being considered. This is a major discrimination which affected the scope of their performance in their roles. The identified policy in my organisation was conflicting with the identified legislation (Equality Act 2010). From a general context, the legislation is used in protecting occurrence of any form of discrimination. A majority of the employees tend to have a disconnect with this policy but with fears of highlighting this issue to the management teams. How to Raise the Issue Considering I was significantly impacted by this policy, I preferred highlighting the issue in an informal manner with employer. At the start, I felt nervous pertaining to highlighting on this issue. However, my employer was ready to resolve issues in workplace promptly with zero consideration of the formal approach. I had a strong confidence to talk to different employers since my workplace has put in place a policy encouraging all people to speak up on the issues impacting them. According to ACAS findings, the informal chats with different employers could be raging from quietly speaking up or use of a well-structured meeting/engagement (ACAS, 2023). After making sure I speak up with all the employers, they made an invitation to me to share an engagement for sharing entire concerns. Considering I was the key individual who had pointed out about the issue, I made preparations which I can note for example explained all people unhappiness with policy and evidencing that this policy was conflicting with legislations and ethical practice. In the verge of this meeting, I made an explanation of the issues which had been faced and making suggestions which explain what need to be pursued. The different alternatives towards highlighting on the issue in workplace entail using different suggestion boxes, survey, employee representatives and whistleblowing. In an event the employees have fears of communicating in a direct manner to their employees, they could prioritise on dropping down a messaging in suggestion boxes, making responses to surveys which are shared and engaging various representatives. The legislation facilitates whistleblowing in an event informal strategies have failed in their roles (Marcum & Young, 2020). Example of unethical issue– Manipulating pay required for reimbursement by an organisation. Breaching ethical code– In my work in MNGHA, post-COVID, the employees were provided with an opportunity for remote working. My organisation had assumed a full charge to facilitate and support the remote working practices. The support scope involved internet connection subscriptions, renewing systems (Microsoft 365 and Zoom). It was expected that the overall costs of operations would substantially increase. A manipulation of what needed to be paid was evident by some of the employee. Taking money by false pretence by the employees is an unethical issue. Procedure to raise the issue · Engaging senior management for a meeting · Documentation of the issues raised in form of bills, suspicion · Harnessing a professional-based approach · Setting the communication approach to be adopted in managing unethical practices
|
| Argue the human and business benefits of people feeling included, valued, and fairly treated at work linking to (two) related theory. (AC2.1)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 400 words
|
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD 5HR03 Task One–Report Section One
(Solution) CIPD Level 7 7HR01: Strategic Employment Relations
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_5HR01_22_01 5HR01 Employment relationship management
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC APGCM Module: Contract & Category Management in P&S
- Implement one AI-driven analytics platform by Q4 2024, integrating with existing systems and training staff to enhance forecasting accuracy and negotiate a 10% reduction in supplier costs, led by the IT, procurement, and finance departments. Despite potential initial costs and staff adaptation challenges, this initiative aims to achieve a 15% increase in forecasting accuracy.
- Fully deploy advanced supply chain management software by Q2 2025, partnering with a leading provider and training teams to reduce disruptions by 20%, thus increasing overall supply chain efficiency by 5%. This effort involves collaboration between supply chain management, IT, and vendor management teams, despite initial disruptions and high upfront costs.
- Establish a cross-functional compliance team by Q3 2024 to develop three new policies annually, ensuring 100% compliance with regulations and enhancing reputation metrics by 15%. Led by legal, compliance, and HR departments, this initiative aims to overcome resistance to policy changes and resource-intensive monitoring efforts.
- Implement three financial instruments (futures, options, currency swaps) by Q3 2024, collaborating with financial experts to reduce financial risks by 20% and achieve a 10% increase in financial stability. This effort, led by finance, risk management, and external advisors, addresses potential challenges in market volatility and regulatory constraints.
- Engage multiple suppliers and form five strategic partnerships by Q4 2024, increasing supplier diversity by 30% and improving supply chain reliability metrics by 10%. Led by procurement, vendor management, and supply chain analysts, this initiative aims to mitigate dependency risks and manage supplier relationships effectively. Potential challenges include maintaining consistency in product/service quality across diverse suppliers and increased administrative burden in managing multiple partnerships.
- Conduct market and competitor analyses twice a year starting Q3 2024, aiming to increase procurement cost savings by 15% through better negotiation strategies and timely market insights. This effort, involving procurement, and strategy departments, addresses challenges in data availability and competitive analysis capabilities. Potential challenges include delays in obtaining and analysing market data and difficulty in predicting competitive moves accurately.
(Solution) CIPS Qatar Managing Expenditures with Suppliers
(Solution) CIPS Oman LNG LLC Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award (APCE)
- In this assessment, by selecting Oman Liquefied Natural Gas LLC (Oman LNG), contractual terms for identifying the distribution of power and risk between the supplier and the organisation has been pursued.
- In the different areas which have been focused on for evaluation making the contract, it is evident that there are areas where risk and power is distributed to either party.
- There is no dominant stakeholders assuming exclusive risk or power of the contract.
- Further, the findings in this assessment has identified the distribution of risks and power in the contract as being informed by the scale, diversified level and core feature of the contract implementation.