Description
Solution
Table 2 Data: Line Managers and Employees’ Feedback
Response | Strongly Agree (50 Responses) | Agree (50 Responses) | Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Agree (235 Responses) | Agree (235 Responses) | Disagree (235 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (235 Responses) | |
A | 6.00% | 58.00% | 22.00% | 14.00% | 0.85% | 47.23% | 51.49% | 0.43% | |
B | 8.00% | 44.00% | 46.00% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 16.60% | 79.57% | 1.70% | |
C | 14.00% | 58.00% | 18.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 60.00% | 34.89% | 2.55% | |
D | 6.00% | 52.00% | 22.00% | 20.00% | 6.38% | 42.13% | 37.87% | 13.62% | |
E | 0.00% | 0.00% | 88.00% | 12.00% | 34.74% | 33.62% | 6.38% | 4.26% | |
F | 0.00% | 18.00% | 74.00% | 8.00% | 0.00% | 60.84% | 39.15% | 0.00% | |
G | 24.00% | 8.00% | 30.00% | 38.00% | 29.36% | 27.66% | 23.83% | 19.15% | |
H | 24% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 22.98% | 42.98% | 29.79% | 4.26% |
Table 2 identified patterns, themes and trends
Line managers
For line managers (50 responses), items C and G show stronger agreement, indicating higher levels of support or alignment with certain practices. In contrast, items E and F show significant disagreement, suggesting that some practices may not be perceived as beneficial or effective by line managers.
Employees
Employees (235 responses) exhibit different trends. For example, item E has a high “Strongly Agree” rate, indicating support among employees, while line managers largely disagreed. This suggests a disconnect between employee perceptions and managerial views.
Items A and B show stronger disagreement from employees than from line managers, hinting at employee dissatisfaction with certain aspects of management.
The benefits include:
While most managers felt secure in their abilities to assign ratings without interference or criticism, employees were only moderately on board.
Table 1 -3 Diagrammatic Representations
Pie Chart: Performance of Administration Department in Quarter 2
Pie Chart shows the performance distribution for the Administration Department in Quarter 2, with 10% of reviews marked as “Outstanding,” 40% as “Meets KPIs,” another 40% as “Not Quite There,” and 10% as “Underperforming.” This indicates a relatively balanced performance with room for improvement across different performance levels
Column Chart: Outstanding Performance by Department and Quarter
Compares the percentage of “Outstanding” performance by department across Quarter 1 and Quarter 2. Sales had 100% outstanding in Quarter 1, while R&D saw a significant increase in Quarter 2.
Horizontal Bar Chart: Underperforming Performance by Department and Quarter
Represents the “Underperforming” percentages by department across the two quarters. The Administration Department showed a reduction from 30% in Quarter 1 to 10% in Quarter 2, while Sales consistently had no underperforming scores.
Table 1 Recommendations
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
Question 5 (AC2.1) 7C002 succession planning are elitist in character and inappropriate for use by organisations committed to equality, diversity and inclusion
(Solution) ROSHN CIPS PIN Negotiation Type and Strategy
(Solution) CIPS Emirates Transport Company Strategic Supply Chain Management SSCM
- This assessment has focused on evaluating the supply chain map in Tyres spend category in ETC organisation.
- The relevance of this has been to enumerate the extent in which their supply chain is characterised by strengths and weaknesses as it influence the scope of the stakeholders interaction.
- Successful evaluation and eventual development of supply chain is core as it note on stakeholders visibility, ethical-best practice, risk management and costs reduction.
- Strengths identified to be associated with the 2-tier supply chain entail a high-level collaboration, cost reduction and managing time appropriately.
- ETC is found to gain from a high-level positioning in UAE Transport sector. This is with their innovation increasing since supply chain is integrated with technology use.
(Solution) CIPS PDV- Driving Value through Procurement and Supply; Managing Expenditures with Suppliers
- In this report, it has identified IT spend category and its relevance to different stakeholders in RCU organisation.
- Through an active prioritisation of the Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU), the best practice in the organisation has been noted for an active evaluation.
- Further, through pursuing brief market analysis, the scope of PS&M provision of value for money outcomes have been generated. The identified spend category for RCU entail the Information
- Technology (IT) which has been increasing in budgetary allocation over the years ensuring it is appropriately positioned in the active organisation operations.
- This has been evaluated to note on the value of money outcomes by leveraging on tools such as Porter’s 5 Forces, STEEPLE analysis, SWOT and Mendelow Matrix analysis among others.