Description
Solution
Table 2 Data: Line Managers and Employees’ Feedback
Response | Strongly Agree (50 Responses) | Agree (50 Responses) | Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Agree (235 Responses) | Agree (235 Responses) | Disagree (235 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (235 Responses) | |
A | 6.00% | 58.00% | 22.00% | 14.00% | 0.85% | 47.23% | 51.49% | 0.43% | |
B | 8.00% | 44.00% | 46.00% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 16.60% | 79.57% | 1.70% | |
C | 14.00% | 58.00% | 18.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 60.00% | 34.89% | 2.55% | |
D | 6.00% | 52.00% | 22.00% | 20.00% | 6.38% | 42.13% | 37.87% | 13.62% | |
E | 0.00% | 0.00% | 88.00% | 12.00% | 34.74% | 33.62% | 6.38% | 4.26% | |
F | 0.00% | 18.00% | 74.00% | 8.00% | 0.00% | 60.84% | 39.15% | 0.00% | |
G | 24.00% | 8.00% | 30.00% | 38.00% | 29.36% | 27.66% | 23.83% | 19.15% | |
H | 24% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 22.98% | 42.98% | 29.79% | 4.26% |
Table 2 identified patterns, themes and trends
Line managers
For line managers (50 responses), items C and G show stronger agreement, indicating higher levels of support or alignment with certain practices. In contrast, items E and F show significant disagreement, suggesting that some practices may not be perceived as beneficial or effective by line managers.
Employees
Employees (235 responses) exhibit different trends. For example, item E has a high “Strongly Agree” rate, indicating support among employees, while line managers largely disagreed. This suggests a disconnect between employee perceptions and managerial views.
Items A and B show stronger disagreement from employees than from line managers, hinting at employee dissatisfaction with certain aspects of management.
The benefits include:
While most managers felt secure in their abilities to assign ratings without interference or criticism, employees were only moderately on board.
Table 1 -3 Diagrammatic Representations
Pie Chart: Performance of Administration Department in Quarter 2
Pie Chart shows the performance distribution for the Administration Department in Quarter 2, with 10% of reviews marked as “Outstanding,” 40% as “Meets KPIs,” another 40% as “Not Quite There,” and 10% as “Underperforming.” This indicates a relatively balanced performance with room for improvement across different performance levels
Column Chart: Outstanding Performance by Department and Quarter
Compares the percentage of “Outstanding” performance by department across Quarter 1 and Quarter 2. Sales had 100% outstanding in Quarter 1, while R&D saw a significant increase in Quarter 2.
Horizontal Bar Chart: Underperforming Performance by Department and Quarter
Represents the “Underperforming” percentages by department across the two quarters. The Administration Department showed a reduction from 30% in Quarter 1 to 10% in Quarter 2, while Sales consistently had no underperforming scores.
Table 1 Recommendations
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC APCM Advanced Category Management
- In conclusion, this assessment has focused on developing an evaluation of the contractual terms and impact on power distribution in Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) and risk of supplier and organisation has been evaluated.
- A general contract used in ADNOC purchasing of goods has been used for achieving the aim of this assessment. Also, desk research and statistics have been used for the purpose of generating the expected findings.
- The findings indicate that the terms and conditions clearly stipulate on risks and power distribution between ADNOC and their suppliers of the gas turbines. This has been identified by application of various tools and models relevant for this assessment.