Description
Solution
Table 2 Data: Line Managers and Employees’ Feedback
| Response | Strongly Agree (50 Responses) | Agree (50 Responses) | Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Agree (235 Responses) | Agree (235 Responses) | Disagree (235 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (235 Responses) | |
| A | 6.00% | 58.00% | 22.00% | 14.00% | 0.85% | 47.23% | 51.49% | 0.43% | |
| B | 8.00% | 44.00% | 46.00% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 16.60% | 79.57% | 1.70% | |
| C | 14.00% | 58.00% | 18.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 60.00% | 34.89% | 2.55% | |
| D | 6.00% | 52.00% | 22.00% | 20.00% | 6.38% | 42.13% | 37.87% | 13.62% | |
| E | 0.00% | 0.00% | 88.00% | 12.00% | 34.74% | 33.62% | 6.38% | 4.26% | |
| F | 0.00% | 18.00% | 74.00% | 8.00% | 0.00% | 60.84% | 39.15% | 0.00% | |
| G | 24.00% | 8.00% | 30.00% | 38.00% | 29.36% | 27.66% | 23.83% | 19.15% | |
| H | 24% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 22.98% | 42.98% | 29.79% | 4.26% |
Table 2 identified patterns, themes and trends
Line managers
For line managers (50 responses), items C and G show stronger agreement, indicating higher levels of support or alignment with certain practices. In contrast, items E and F show significant disagreement, suggesting that some practices may not be perceived as beneficial or effective by line managers.
Employees
Employees (235 responses) exhibit different trends. For example, item E has a high “Strongly Agree” rate, indicating support among employees, while line managers largely disagreed. This suggests a disconnect between employee perceptions and managerial views.
Items A and B show stronger disagreement from employees than from line managers, hinting at employee dissatisfaction with certain aspects of management.
The benefits include:
While most managers felt secure in their abilities to assign ratings without interference or criticism, employees were only moderately on board.
Table 1 -3 Diagrammatic Representations
Pie Chart: Performance of Administration Department in Quarter 2
Pie Chart shows the performance distribution for the Administration Department in Quarter 2, with 10% of reviews marked as “Outstanding,” 40% as “Meets KPIs,” another 40% as “Not Quite There,” and 10% as “Underperforming.” This indicates a relatively balanced performance with room for improvement across different performance levels
Column Chart: Outstanding Performance by Department and Quarter
Compares the percentage of “Outstanding” performance by department across Quarter 1 and Quarter 2. Sales had 100% outstanding in Quarter 1, while R&D saw a significant increase in Quarter 2.
Horizontal Bar Chart: Underperforming Performance by Department and Quarter
Represents the “Underperforming” percentages by department across the two quarters. The Administration Department showed a reduction from 30% in Quarter 1 to 10% in Quarter 2, while Sales consistently had no underperforming scores.
Table 1 Recommendations
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD Level 5 Avado Learning 5C003- Professional Behaviours and Valuing People
(Solution) 7C003 3.2 Continuing professional development for learning and reflection
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC Leadership & Management in Procurement and Supply
- In summary, this assessment has focused on evaluating the best practice in achieving a successful leadership and management. In particular, this report has focused on ADNOC offshore company.
- To achieve this, impact of leadership and management on the organisation behaviour has been evaluated, the impact of leadership approaches for job satisfaction and sources of power in an organisation.
- Additionally, the relevance of equality and diversity policies in ADNOC offshore organisation has also been evaluated.
- By application of various tools and techniques such as PESTLE external analysis, this research has hypothesised that for organisations success in their operations, they ought to holistically establish the leadership and management process.
- For leadership, this has a direct impact on organisation behaviours. Further, by achieving leadership and satisfaction, an organisation success is guaranteed.
- Hence, ADNOC has been established to have a successful leadership and management process.
(Solution) 5HR02 (AC1.1) Explain how organisations strategically position themselves in competitive labour markets
(Solution) CIPS Negotiation Plan (PIN) Sustainable Water Solutions Company (SWS)
- To successfully implement detailed preparations in negotiation strategy for ensuring entire stakeholders offer their interests and priority in negotiation
- A successful embrace of innovativeness and technologies in negotiation plan strategy
- Ensuring custom-made negotiation process in multiple spend areas as opposed to a general negotiation process
- To enhance effective documentation of negotiation process with any disagreements in negotiation plan successfully
