-75%
(Solution) 5CO02 (AC2.1) With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
KaribuCustomer
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Table 1 Data
All department’s performance review judgements as a percentage:
| Department | Quarter | Outstanding | Meets KPIs | Not Quite There | Underperforming |
| Administration Department | 1 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
| 2 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
|
| Sales Department | 1 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.OO% |
| 2 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| Logistics Department | 1 | 4/10 x100=
20% |
8/10 x100=
40.00% |
6/10 x100=
30.00% |
2/10 x100=
10.00% |
| 2 | 5/20-2 Absent x100=
27.78% |
9/20-2 Absent x100=
50.00% |
4/20-2 Absent x 100= 22.22% | 0.00% | |
| Research & Development | 1 | 3/10 x100=
30.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
1/10 x100=
10.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
| 2 | 1 Absent =(10-1=9)
5/9 55.55 |
1 Absent =
3/9 33.33% |
1 Absent =
1/9 11.11% |
0.00% |
Bonus Payments Calculation for ‘Outstanding’ Employees
Each eligible employee in the administrative department had their bonus payments added together during the first quarter to determine their overall bonus payment. This was the entire bonus sum that was due for that particular division and time period.
Formulae for Bonus: Salary x 0.04
| Department | Employee | Salary | Bonus | Quarter |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q1 |
| Robin Bird | £31,500 | £1,260 | Q1 | |
| Logistics | Sally Rigbye | £23,750 | £950 | Q1 |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Rick Lovall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q1 |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q2 |
| Logistics | Ruth Sixsmith | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 |
| Wendy Boot | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 | |
| Jean Livesey | £26,000 | £1,040 | Q2 | |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 |
| Harrison Briggs | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 | |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Steve Owen | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Total | £9,170 | Q1 Total | ||
| £11,600 | Q2 Total | |||
| £20,770 | Overall Total |
Summary of Bonus Payments
| Quarter | Total (£) |
| Quarter 1 | £9,170 |
| Quarter 2 | £11,600 |
| Overall Total | £20,770 |
Bonus Information Analysis
The Administration and Logistics teams earned constant awards in both Q1 and Q2, demonstrating consistent performance across departments, according to the bonus data. Particularly in the second quarter, a larger number of employees in the Logistics and Research & Development divisions received incentives. Bonuses went up from £9,170 in Q1 to £11,600 in Q2, which could be attributed to more output or better performance reviews in the second quarter.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_7CO02_24_01 Question 4 (AC 1.4)
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) 5C003 reasons why this is important and the consequences of people practitioners not being willing or able to influence others (AC 1.3)
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPD PWC 5HR01: Employment Relationship Management
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPS PIN Final Assessment Negotiation in procurement and supply
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
- In this integrative assessment for Corporate Award Program establishes it has provided a formal commercial negotiation for Occidental of Oman operating in oil and gas industry.
- Commercial negotiation plan has been developed by reference to data, factual information and CIPS tools. HSE and chemicals portfolio spend category has been identified and evaluated in-depth to come up with an appropriate negotiation plan.
- The importance of identifying the HSE and Chemicals are informed by the previous COVID-19 pandemic which has informed on the need for adopting healthy business environment which is free from any infections.
- Further, coming from the pandemic where the level of business operations had significantly reduced and the organisation need to restart their operations by cleansing their systems and machines. In this case, the need for HSE and the chemicals portfolio in Occidental of Oman has been in an upward trajectory.
- For negotiation successful implementation, Occidental of Oman involves professionals, terms and conditions initiated, holistic readiness and streamlined procurement and supply chain approaches. This is with good forecast and plans being core for guaranteeing customers services delivery on time.
- From the analysis, different tools including SWOT, PESTLE and 4R’s have evidenced that Occidental of Oman is always on the advantage of ensuring they achieve the Best Alternative for Negotiated Agreement (BATNA).
- Also, this report highlight the need for holistic planning by prioritising on all expectation from the initial opening to the closure and agreement phases of negotiation.
(Solution) CIPS Sourcing Essentials (PSE) Saudi Aramco
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Executive Summary
This assessment focuses on evaluating the various sourcing approaches applicable in Procurement and Supply Management (PS&M) for modern organisations. The organisation of focus is Saudi Aramco in their Third Party Logistics (3PL) spend area. Evaluation of the various sourcing approaches has been informed by a review of the internal data/documentation available, models of CIPS and module contents. The key findings in this report is that the preference in Saudi Aramco in sourcing of the 3PL spend area is the multiple sourcing. The choice is identified in the key findings as being informed by immense competition in their market. Also, the sole and single sourcing approaches are also a preference in an event the supplier exist in solitary with their involvement informed by varying organisation demands. Additionally, the key findings evidence single sourcing as being preferred when despite of multiple suppliers in place, the preference is only for one. This is while the dual sourcing being adopted in an event the various methods/choices in sourcing are used and prioritised. Eventually, by embrace of supplier appraisal tool, the 3PL sourcing in Saudi Aramco has been generated. The overall outcome of the appraisal process by embrace of Carter’s 10C’s note successful organisation is guided by successful value for money outcomes and improving market growth in oil and gas sector.
Considering the key findings and conclusions made in this assessment, a set of limitations and gaps have been generated which could be managed through a set of recommendations including;
- Pursue detailed internal and external analysis process for identifying best sourcing approach
- Introduction of a more detailed sourcing appraisal process by PS&M
- Focusing on management of success in sourcing approach defining the policy and operations of Saudi Aramco in 3PL sourcing
- Inclusion of all stakeholders in their practice for successful sourcing process
- Implement capacity development strategy for PS&M detailed appreciation of importance of various sourcing approaches
(Solution) CIPD Avado 5HR01- Employment Relationship Management
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.