-75%
(Solution) 5CO02 (AC2.1) With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
KaribuCustomer
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Table 1 Data
All department’s performance review judgements as a percentage:
| Department | Quarter | Outstanding | Meets KPIs | Not Quite There | Underperforming |
| Administration Department | 1 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
| 2 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
|
| Sales Department | 1 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.OO% |
| 2 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| Logistics Department | 1 | 4/10 x100=
20% |
8/10 x100=
40.00% |
6/10 x100=
30.00% |
2/10 x100=
10.00% |
| 2 | 5/20-2 Absent x100=
27.78% |
9/20-2 Absent x100=
50.00% |
4/20-2 Absent x 100= 22.22% | 0.00% | |
| Research & Development | 1 | 3/10 x100=
30.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
1/10 x100=
10.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
| 2 | 1 Absent =(10-1=9)
5/9 55.55 |
1 Absent =
3/9 33.33% |
1 Absent =
1/9 11.11% |
0.00% |
Bonus Payments Calculation for ‘Outstanding’ Employees
Each eligible employee in the administrative department had their bonus payments added together during the first quarter to determine their overall bonus payment. This was the entire bonus sum that was due for that particular division and time period.
Formulae for Bonus: Salary x 0.04
| Department | Employee | Salary | Bonus | Quarter |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q1 |
| Robin Bird | £31,500 | £1,260 | Q1 | |
| Logistics | Sally Rigbye | £23,750 | £950 | Q1 |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Rick Lovall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q1 |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q2 |
| Logistics | Ruth Sixsmith | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 |
| Wendy Boot | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 | |
| Jean Livesey | £26,000 | £1,040 | Q2 | |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 |
| Harrison Briggs | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 | |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Steve Owen | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Total | £9,170 | Q1 Total | ||
| £11,600 | Q2 Total | |||
| £20,770 | Overall Total |
Summary of Bonus Payments
| Quarter | Total (£) |
| Quarter 1 | £9,170 |
| Quarter 2 | £11,600 |
| Overall Total | £20,770 |
Bonus Information Analysis
The Administration and Logistics teams earned constant awards in both Q1 and Q2, demonstrating consistent performance across departments, according to the bonus data. Particularly in the second quarter, a larger number of employees in the Logistics and Research & Development divisions received incentives. Bonuses went up from £9,170 in Q1 to £11,600 in Q2, which could be attributed to more output or better performance reviews in the second quarter.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) New Oakwood International 3CO03 Core behaviours for people professionals ID / CIPD_3CO03_24_01
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
Original price was: £ 50.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.
(Solution) New CIPS Corporate Award Advanced Practitioner (CAAP) Project proposal
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Today, in oil and gas sector in UAE, it is encountering immense pressures from different stakeholders for addressing tendering process in their contracts management. Nevertheless, there exist less literature which has evaluate the implication of incorporation of technologies for enhancing issues linked with accessing, delivering timelines and input. This is through developing a system which enhance one-on-one communication reducing the entire contracts evaluation cycle.
The process would have a positive implication on ADNOC and their different suppliers by managing issues associated with access, timeline of provision, communication, paper usage and input therefore reduced tendering evaluation process.
The different deliverables for the current project would include the following;
- Improved engagement of different stakeholders in tendering process of contracts process
- Increased costs savings by reducing communication barriers and also reducing the number of employees working in tendering process
- An effective data management and recording for ensuring success in evaluation and use of the data for contracts tendering process metrics
- Effective management of issues in the contracts evaluation and recommend best strategies in their mitigation during tendering process
- To effectively pursue trend analysis to understand the history of evaluations and effectively use the data in managing tendering process
(Solution) CIPS PIN Final Assessment Negotiation in procurement and supply
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
- In this integrative assessment for Corporate Award Program establishes it has provided a formal commercial negotiation for Occidental of Oman operating in oil and gas industry.
- Commercial negotiation plan has been developed by reference to data, factual information and CIPS tools. HSE and chemicals portfolio spend category has been identified and evaluated in-depth to come up with an appropriate negotiation plan.
- The importance of identifying the HSE and Chemicals are informed by the previous COVID-19 pandemic which has informed on the need for adopting healthy business environment which is free from any infections.
- Further, coming from the pandemic where the level of business operations had significantly reduced and the organisation need to restart their operations by cleansing their systems and machines. In this case, the need for HSE and the chemicals portfolio in Occidental of Oman has been in an upward trajectory.
- For negotiation successful implementation, Occidental of Oman involves professionals, terms and conditions initiated, holistic readiness and streamlined procurement and supply chain approaches. This is with good forecast and plans being core for guaranteeing customers services delivery on time.
- From the analysis, different tools including SWOT, PESTLE and 4R’s have evidenced that Occidental of Oman is always on the advantage of ensuring they achieve the Best Alternative for Negotiated Agreement (BATNA).
- Also, this report highlight the need for holistic planning by prioritising on all expectation from the initial opening to the closure and agreement phases of negotiation.
(Solution) 7C002 Question 6 (AC2.2)Linking People Management Practice with Improved business performance
Original price was: £ 50.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.