(Solution) 5CO02 (AC2.1) With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Table 1 Data
All department’s performance review judgements as a percentage:
| Department | Quarter | Outstanding | Meets KPIs | Not Quite There | Underperforming |
| Administration Department | 1 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
| 2 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
|
| Sales Department | 1 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.OO% |
| 2 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| Logistics Department | 1 | 4/10 x100=
20% |
8/10 x100=
40.00% |
6/10 x100=
30.00% |
2/10 x100=
10.00% |
| 2 | 5/20-2 Absent x100=
27.78% |
9/20-2 Absent x100=
50.00% |
4/20-2 Absent x 100= 22.22% | 0.00% | |
| Research & Development | 1 | 3/10 x100=
30.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
1/10 x100=
10.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
| 2 | 1 Absent =(10-1=9)
5/9 55.55 |
1 Absent =
3/9 33.33% |
1 Absent =
1/9 11.11% |
0.00% |
Bonus Payments Calculation for ‘Outstanding’ Employees
Each eligible employee in the administrative department had their bonus payments added together during the first quarter to determine their overall bonus payment. This was the entire bonus sum that was due for that particular division and time period.
Formulae for Bonus: Salary x 0.04
| Department | Employee | Salary | Bonus | Quarter |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q1 |
| Robin Bird | £31,500 | £1,260 | Q1 | |
| Logistics | Sally Rigbye | £23,750 | £950 | Q1 |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Rick Lovall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q1 |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q2 |
| Logistics | Ruth Sixsmith | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 |
| Wendy Boot | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 | |
| Jean Livesey | £26,000 | £1,040 | Q2 | |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 |
| Harrison Briggs | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 | |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Steve Owen | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Total | £9,170 | Q1 Total | ||
| £11,600 | Q2 Total | |||
| £20,770 | Overall Total |
Summary of Bonus Payments
| Quarter | Total (£) |
| Quarter 1 | £9,170 |
| Quarter 2 | £11,600 |
| Overall Total | £20,770 |
Bonus Information Analysis
The Administration and Logistics teams earned constant awards in both Q1 and Q2, demonstrating consistent performance across departments, according to the bonus data. Particularly in the second quarter, a larger number of employees in the Logistics and Research & Development divisions received incentives. Bonuses went up from £9,170 in Q1 to £11,600 in Q2, which could be attributed to more output or better performance reviews in the second quarter.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD Explain different recruitment methods and when it is appropriate to use them. (AC1.3)
(Solution) MGT504 Strategic Management
(Solution) Assessment ID / CIPD_7CO02_24_01 7CO02 People management and development strategies for performance
(Solution) Amended CIPD 5C003 Professional Behaviours and Valuing People
(Solution) 5C003 range of formal or informal development activities and add these to your CPD Plan/document (AC 3.3)
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.