Description
Solution
Table 1 Data
All department’s performance review judgements as a percentage:
Department | Quarter | Outstanding | Meets KPIs | Not Quite There | Underperforming |
Administration Department | 1 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
2 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
|
Sales Department | 1 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.OO% |
2 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
Logistics Department | 1 | 4/10 x100=
20% |
8/10 x100=
40.00% |
6/10 x100=
30.00% |
2/10 x100=
10.00% |
2 | 5/20-2 Absent x100=
27.78% |
9/20-2 Absent x100=
50.00% |
4/20-2 Absent x 100= 22.22% | 0.00% | |
Research & Development | 1 | 3/10 x100=
30.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
1/10 x100=
10.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
2 | 1 Absent =(10-1=9)
5/9 55.55 |
1 Absent =
3/9 33.33% |
1 Absent =
1/9 11.11% |
0.00% |
Bonus Payments Calculation for ‘Outstanding’ Employees
Each eligible employee in the administrative department had their bonus payments added together during the first quarter to determine their overall bonus payment. This was the entire bonus sum that was due for that particular division and time period.
Formulae for Bonus: Salary x 0.04
Department | Employee | Salary | Bonus | Quarter |
Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q1 |
Robin Bird | £31,500 | £1,260 | Q1 | |
Logistics | Sally Rigbye | £23,750 | £950 | Q1 |
Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
Rick Lovall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q1 |
Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q2 |
Logistics | Ruth Sixsmith | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 |
Wendy Boot | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 | |
Jean Livesey | £26,000 | £1,040 | Q2 | |
Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 |
Harrison Briggs | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 | |
Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
Steve Owen | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
Total | £9,170 | Q1 Total | ||
£11,600 | Q2 Total | |||
£20,770 | Overall Total |
Summary of Bonus Payments
Quarter | Total (£) |
Quarter 1 | £9,170 |
Quarter 2 | £11,600 |
Overall Total | £20,770 |
Bonus Information Analysis
The Administration and Logistics teams earned constant awards in both Q1 and Q2, demonstrating consistent performance across departments, according to the bonus data. Particularly in the second quarter, a larger number of employees in the Logistics and Research & Development divisions received incentives. Bonuses went up from £9,170 in Q1 to £11,600 in Q2, which could be attributed to more output or better performance reviews in the second quarter.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPD One analysis tool and analysis method Technivara might apply to recognise and diagnose issues, challenges, and opportunities
(Solution) CIPS PSE Sourcing Essentials Assessment
- Smiths Detection has a robust procurement and supply guided by various clauses, including control, quality, records, and timely management of the sourcing process.
- For different categories of spend, Smiths Detection applies single, dual, multiple, or sole sourcing process.
- Drawing from the pros and cons of the different sourcing methods, it is apparent that there is no unique and universal approach for Smiths Detection sourcing.
- Rather, the approaches are unique to the categories of spend.
- Drawing from the Carter’s 10 Cs appraisal model, it is essential for Smiths Detection to examine the various aspects of the potential suppliers for informed decision-making process.
(Solution) CIPD 2024 5HR02 Talent management and workforce planning Assessment ID / CIPD_5HR02_22_01
(Solution) MGT504 Strategic Management
(Solution) Oakwood International 5CO03 Task One –Professional and ethical behaviours
Task One –Professional and ethical behaviours
This task requires you to consider the significance of professional and ethical behaviours for a people practitioner and the values that underpin the people practice profession. To complete the task, you should provide a written response to each of questions below, making appropriate use of academic theory and practical examples to expand your response and illustrate key points.- With reference to typical activities and behaviours, appraise what it means to be a ‘people professional’. (AC 1.1)
- Discuss how ethical values underpin the work of a people professional, including two examples of how ethical values might be applied in a people practice context. (AC 1.2)
- Consider the importance of people professionals being able to influence others and ensure that the ‘people practice voice’ is heard in an organisation, through informed, clear and confident communication. (AC 1.3)
- For each of the situations below (a & b), provide an example of an issue that would cause you to raise the matter to a manager (or other authority) - and describe how you would do this.
- a) where you consider something to be unethical (whether or not it is illegal),
- b) where you believe something contravenes legislation. (AC 1.4)
- Discuss two theories or models relating to the human and business benefits of people at work feeling included, valued, and fairly treated, concluding your discussion with a summary of your own view of these benefits. (AC 2.1)
- Discuss two ways in which a people professional can build inclusivity into a people practice initiative at the design stage, and two ways of checking inclusivity after a people practice initiative is implemented. (AC 2.2)