(Solution) 5CO02 (AC2.1) With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 40.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Table 1 Data
All department’s performance review judgements as a percentage:
| Department | Quarter | Outstanding | Meets KPIs | Not Quite There | Underperforming |
| Administration Department | 1 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
2/10 x100= 20% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
3/10 x100= 30% |
| 2 | 1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
4/10 x100= 40% |
1 Absent (11-1=10)
1/10 x100= 10% |
|
| Sales Department | 1 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.OO% |
| 2 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| Logistics Department | 1 | 4/10 x100=
20% |
8/10 x100=
40.00% |
6/10 x100=
30.00% |
2/10 x100=
10.00% |
| 2 | 5/20-2 Absent x100=
27.78% |
9/20-2 Absent x100=
50.00% |
4/20-2 Absent x 100= 22.22% | 0.00% | |
| Research & Development | 1 | 3/10 x100=
30.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
1/10 x100=
10.00% |
3/10 x100=
30.00% |
| 2 | 1 Absent =(10-1=9)
5/9 55.55 |
1 Absent =
3/9 33.33% |
1 Absent =
1/9 11.11% |
0.00% |
Bonus Payments Calculation for ‘Outstanding’ Employees
Each eligible employee in the administrative department had their bonus payments added together during the first quarter to determine their overall bonus payment. This was the entire bonus sum that was due for that particular division and time period.
Formulae for Bonus: Salary x 0.04
| Department | Employee | Salary | Bonus | Quarter |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q1 |
| Robin Bird | £31,500 | £1,260 | Q1 | |
| Logistics | Sally Rigbye | £23,750 | £950 | Q1 |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Rick Lovall | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q1 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q1 |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q1 | |
| Administration | Saffron Finch | £24,000 | £960 | Q2 |
| Logistics | Ruth Sixsmith | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 |
| Wendy Boot | £23,750 | £950 | Q2 | |
| Jean Livesey | £26,000 | £1,040 | Q2 | |
| Julie Chisnall | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Gill Jamieson | £19,500 | £780 | Q2 | |
| Research & Dev. | Ethan Brar | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 |
| Harrison Briggs | £32,500 | £1,300 | Q2 | |
| Tasha Graham | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Jennifer Frost | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Steve Owen | £29,500 | £1,180 | Q2 | |
| Total | £9,170 | Q1 Total | ||
| £11,600 | Q2 Total | |||
| £20,770 | Overall Total |
Summary of Bonus Payments
| Quarter | Total (£) |
| Quarter 1 | £9,170 |
| Quarter 2 | £11,600 |
| Overall Total | £20,770 |
Bonus Information Analysis
The Administration and Logistics teams earned constant awards in both Q1 and Q2, demonstrating consistent performance across departments, according to the bonus data. Particularly in the second quarter, a larger number of employees in the Logistics and Research & Development divisions received incentives. Bonuses went up from £9,170 in Q1 to £11,600 in Q2, which could be attributed to more output or better performance reviews in the second quarter.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS Sourcing Essentials Assessment
- In this assessment, sourcing approaches have been identified and holistically reviewed. This is in line with RCU organisation IT spend category. This is further compared with payment services, document management category which is office suppliers and postal services.
- For evaluating the identified spend categories, various tools have been selected which are Kraljic Analysis Tool, Mendelow’s Analysis Tool for Stakeholder analysis and the Maslow Hierarchy of needs.
- Further, by using the SWOT analysis, the internal and external factors of the sourcing have been selected. A further analysis by use of Peter Block Grid’s has been applied to evaluate the interests of stakeholders to source appropriate position.
- The findings indicate that RCU adopts the best sourcing approach based on their needs.
- Finally, by using Carter’s 10Cs model, the best practice for pursuing suppliers appraisal has been provided for IT spend category.
(Solution) CIPD Avado AC 3.1 (Email 5) Discuss the legal implications of varying contracts
(Solution) 5CO01 (AC2.2) Assess how people practices impact on organisational culture and behaviour
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply (PDC)
- In this assessment, an evaluation of ROSHN company contract terms and conditions have been evaluated.
- By selecting Facilities Management Contract, its effectiveness in ensuring quality issues, time extension risk, costs overruns and unethical practices has been evaluated.
- Further, the importance of performance measures and management in ROSHN company practices has been prioritised for evaluation. The contract terms and conditions have been quoted for evidencing the success of the contract implementation.
- In this assessment, the findings evidence that ROSHN facilities management spend category is characterised by various issues which are stipulated by the terms and conditions.
- The relevance of this is ensuring success in managing the overall faced challenges.
- By reviewing the different terms and conditions, the issues related to performance management, force majeure, costs, indemnity, risk management and insurance have been put into account.
- Also, the battle of forms have been evaluated with the best practice in their management identified.