Description
Solution
(AC3.1) Discuss the links between the employee lifecycle and different people practice roles
Employee lifecycle is identified as the process followed by an employee from the time of joining an organisation to their exit (CIPD, 2020). The different stages of employees lifecycle include;
Attraction- The best employees are attracted in an organisation by positioning themselves as an employer brand.
Recruitment- Through the embrace of various recruitment approaches, best employees are engaged in the organisation.
Induction- At the initial phase of the employees engagement in the organisation, support is offered to acclimatise themselves with the organisation.
Retention- By embrace of different strategies including total rewards, the best employees are retained with turnover mitigated.
Development- For improving the employees performance, career growth opportunities are recommended and offered to the employees.
Exit/Separation– Exit interviews are done in this phase to identify reasons of employees leaving the organisation either willingly or unwillingly.
Role of people professional in Recruitment
In this step, the people practice professionals execute various roles as part of recruitment including development of main specifications. According to Nikolaou (2021), these are embraced to advertise job roles, technology use and best practice embraced. The outcome of recruitment aids in selection of the most qualified employee.
Roles of people practitioner in development
In the stage of development, this include the people practice professionals working in development of the essential skills to guide their career growth and improvement. As evidenced in Armstrong and Taylor (2023), in line with competencies demands in an entity, recommendation on most appropriate development strategies is provided by people professionals.
Roles of people practitioner in separation
At the phase of separation, the people practice professionals assist in exiting by working on gathering data to understand reasons for exit and come up with strategies for managing future turnover. Also, the employee is supported and facilitated to exit the organisation.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Commercial Negotiation Plan-PIN
- This was established after the post-negotiation review which brought out fundamental lessons about the supplier and our company’s negotiation pattern.
- As for certain important aspects, we indeed secured favourable financing conditions; yet, problems arose in attempting to synchronize delivery schedules since such conditions are affected by external supply chain factors.
- The supplier had the better BATNA and acted in a cooperative but very assertive way, and elaborated why the correct approach to negotiations is more equal.
- Further, the experience showed how flexible one has to be, how innovative, and how it pays to be more interested in long-term partnership rather than quick profit. Therefore, it will be useful in the future to improve the techniques of negotiation, improve the knowledge about the actions of suppliers, and improve intercompany and supplier cooperation.
- This will ensure that in future procurement negotiations; better outcomes are achieved.
- ROSHN should ensure that all negotiations within the next 6 months include specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and service levels, aiming for a 90% satisfaction rate in supplier compliance with these criteria. This approach will help secure more balanced and sustainable agreements.
- Over the next 12 months, ROSHN should develop a supplier relationship management program with bi-annual assessments to track and improve partnership quality. Target at least a 15% increase in supplier engagement scores by the end of the year to gain favorable bargaining positions during market downturns.
- Within 1 month of each major negotiation, conduct debriefing sessions to analyze performance, identify strengths, and address weaknesses. The goal is to improve negotiation effectiveness by at least 10% in the subsequent quarter through targeted adjustments based on these evaluations.
- Within the next 4 months, involve at least 80% of key stakeholders in sourcing strategy meetings to ensure alignment and gather input on critical decisions. This engagement aims to reduce misalignment issues by 20% within the year, resulting in smoother implementation of sourcing strategies.