(Solution) 5C003 reasons why this is important and the consequences of people practitioners not being willing or able to influence others (AC 1.3)
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
1.3 Importance of People Professionals
Informed Contributions:
People professionals must contribute to discussions in an informed manner to provide valuable insights and evidence-based recommendations. When people practitioners are knowledgeable about current trends, best practices, and legal requirements, they can guide strategic decision-making that aligns with organisational goals. For example, during discussions about implementing a new performance management system, being informed allows a people professional to highlight potential challenges and suggest effective solutions as evidenced by Kadam (2017). This informed approach ensures that decisions are well-grounded, reducing the risk of implementing ineffective or outdated practices.
Clear Communication:
Clear communication is essential for conveying complex ideas in a way that is easily understood by others. When people professionals articulate their points clearly, they minimise misunderstandings and ensure that their message resonates with the audience as evidenced by CIPD (2023a). This is particularly important in diverse teams where members may have different levels of familiarity with HR concepts. For instance, explaining the benefits of a flexible working policy in clear terms helps stakeholders understand its impact on employee well-being and productivity, increasing the likelihood of buy-in.
Confident Expression:
Confidence in discussions helps people professionals assert their viewpoints and advocate for necessary changes ( Kaplan Professional, 2015). Confidence demonstrates expertise and conviction, which can persuade others to consider and support their proposals. For example, confidently advocating for a new diversity and inclusion initiative can help overcome resistance and secure leadership commitment. Confidence also builds trust and credibility, positioning the people professional as a reliable advisor.
Consequences of Failing to Influence:
If people professionals are not willing or able to influence others, several negative consequences can arise. Without influence, important initiatives may be sidelined, leading to missed opportunities for improving organisational outcomes ( Bosley, 2023). Additionally, the absence of informed, clear, and confident contributions can result in poor decision-making, potentially leading to unethical practices, increased grievances, or legal challenges such as employment tribunals. Furthermore, a lack of influence can diminish the perceived value of the people practice profession, resulting in lower levels of employee engagement and a weakened organisational culture.
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) New 5HR01 (AC1.1) Differentiate between employee involvement and employee participation and how they build relationships
(Solution) Explain different selection methods and when it is appropriate to use them. (AC2.1)
(Solution) CIPD 5C002 different ethical perspectives including how these could be used at Technivara to inform and influence decision-making
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC New Driving Value Through Procurement and Supply; Managing Expenditures with Suppliers- PDV
(Solution) CIPD Avado NEW 5CO01 Organisational performance and culture in practice
(Solution) CIPS ROSHN Sourcing Essentials- PSE
- In this report, the area of focus is on different sourcing approaches which can be used in procurement and supply management (PS&M) in contemporary business environment. This is through the focus of ROSHN organisation in Design Building category of spend.
- To achieve the intended aim of this report, data has been sourced from the organisation internal documents, different CIPS modules and models (Mendelow, STEEPLE and Kraljic). The key findings include ROSHN prefeed approach being multiple sourcing owing to the high-level of market competitiveness. This is with sole and single approaches preferred when only one supplier is being engaged owing to differences in organisation needs.
- Also, the findings evidence that single sourcing prevail in an event many suppliers are available, but an organisation decides to go for one. Another finding in this report is that dual sourcing is used when different methods/options for sourcing are embraced and put in place.
- Finally, through the application of supplier appraisal tool, focusing on the Design Building spend area, an evaluation has been put into account. The result from the appraisal using Carter’s 10C’s evidence organisation success to achieve value for money outcomes and improved market development.
- Internal and external analysis to identify most appropriate sourcing strategy
- Broad sourcing appraisal strategy need to be introduced
- Focus on managing successful sourcing strategy as part of organisation policy and practices
- Involve more stakeholders as part of their operations for success in sourcing strategy
- Pursuing capacity development initiatives for PS&M understanding of relevance of different PS&M