(Solution) 5C003 New (AC1.4) Recognise when and how you would raise matters which conflict with ethical values or legislation
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Unethical Behavior in the Workplace
An example of unethical behavior could involve favoritism in recruitment. A hiring manager might deliberately favor a friend or relative for a position despite other candidates being better qualified. This not only breaches fairness but also undermines merit-based hiring (MSPB, 2024). It violates the ethical principle of fairness and impartiality in the recruitment process. Such actions could lead to resentment among employees and lower morale, as the decision is driven by personal interests rather than the organization’s best interests.
If I observed this unethical behavior, I would first gather concrete evidence, such as emails or records of interviews, to support my concern. I would raise the matter to my line manager through a confidential meeting, following the organization’s whistleblowing policy. This approach ensures that the issue is addressed appropriately while protecting my identity. If the manager fails to act, I would escalate the concern to the HR department or another relevant authority, ensuring that my actions align with the organization’s code of ethics.
Contravention of UK Legislation
An example of contravening UK legislation is failing to provide employees with the minimum wage as mandated by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (GOV.UK, 2024). Suppose I discover that certain employees are being paid below the minimum wage, which directly violates the law. This issue could lead to legal repercussions for the organisation and cause significant hardship for the affected employees.
In such a case, I would address the issue by first reviewing payroll records and documenting any discrepancies to ensure clarity. I would then approach my manager and explain how this violates the National Minimum Wage Act. If the issue is not resolved promptly, I would escalate it to HR or the legal department, following the company’s grievance procedure. Should internal mechanisms fail, I would report the matter to external authorities like the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS), ensuring full compliance with legal obligations (ACAS, 2023).
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 7CO03 Learning Journal continuing professional development that involves both planned learning and reflection
(Solution) CIPD Avado AC 2.1 (Email 3) Explain the main principles of discrimination law in recruitment selection and employment
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC Leadership & Management in Procurement and Supply
- In summary, this assessment has focused on evaluating the best practice in achieving a successful leadership and management. In particular, this report has focused on ADNOC offshore company.
- To achieve this, impact of leadership and management on the organisation behaviour has been evaluated, the impact of leadership approaches for job satisfaction and sources of power in an organisation.
- Additionally, the relevance of equality and diversity policies in ADNOC offshore organisation has also been evaluated.
- By application of various tools and techniques such as PESTLE external analysis, this research has hypothesised that for organisations success in their operations, they ought to holistically establish the leadership and management process.
- For leadership, this has a direct impact on organisation behaviours. Further, by achieving leadership and satisfaction, an organisation success is guaranteed.
- Hence, ADNOC has been established to have a successful leadership and management process.
(Solution) CIPS Oman LNG LLC Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award (APCE)
- In this assessment, by selecting Oman Liquefied Natural Gas LLC (Oman LNG), contractual terms for identifying the distribution of power and risk between the supplier and the organisation has been pursued.
- In the different areas which have been focused on for evaluation making the contract, it is evident that there are areas where risk and power is distributed to either party.
- There is no dominant stakeholders assuming exclusive risk or power of the contract.
- Further, the findings in this assessment has identified the distribution of risks and power in the contract as being informed by the scale, diversified level and core feature of the contract implementation.