Description
Solution
Unethical Behavior in the Workplace
An example of unethical behavior could involve favoritism in recruitment. A hiring manager might deliberately favor a friend or relative for a position despite other candidates being better qualified. This not only breaches fairness but also undermines merit-based hiring (MSPB, 2024). It violates the ethical principle of fairness and impartiality in the recruitment process. Such actions could lead to resentment among employees and lower morale, as the decision is driven by personal interests rather than the organization’s best interests.
If I observed this unethical behavior, I would first gather concrete evidence, such as emails or records of interviews, to support my concern. I would raise the matter to my line manager through a confidential meeting, following the organization’s whistleblowing policy. This approach ensures that the issue is addressed appropriately while protecting my identity. If the manager fails to act, I would escalate the concern to the HR department or another relevant authority, ensuring that my actions align with the organization’s code of ethics.
Contravention of UK Legislation
An example of contravening UK legislation is failing to provide employees with the minimum wage as mandated by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (GOV.UK, 2024). Suppose I discover that certain employees are being paid below the minimum wage, which directly violates the law. This issue could lead to legal repercussions for the organisation and cause significant hardship for the affected employees.
In such a case, I would address the issue by first reviewing payroll records and documenting any discrepancies to ensure clarity. I would then approach my manager and explain how this violates the National Minimum Wage Act. If the issue is not resolved promptly, I would escalate it to HR or the legal department, following the company’s grievance procedure. Should internal mechanisms fail, I would report the matter to external authorities like the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS), ensuring full compliance with legal obligations (ACAS, 2023).
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) Level 7 7C001 The Trend Towards Greater Globalisation of International Business Activity
(Solution) CIPD 5HR03 legislative requirements that impact reward practice. (AC 2.4)
(Solution) CIPS Oman LNG LLC Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award (APCE)
- In this assessment, by selecting Oman Liquefied Natural Gas LLC (Oman LNG), contractual terms for identifying the distribution of power and risk between the supplier and the organisation has been pursued.
- In the different areas which have been focused on for evaluation making the contract, it is evident that there are areas where risk and power is distributed to either party.
- There is no dominant stakeholders assuming exclusive risk or power of the contract.
- Further, the findings in this assessment has identified the distribution of risks and power in the contract as being informed by the scale, diversified level and core feature of the contract implementation.
(Solution) MCIPD Experience Assessment Your Strengths and Development Areas
(Solution) CIPS PSE Sourcing Essentials Assessment
- Smiths Detection has a robust procurement and supply guided by various clauses, including control, quality, records, and timely management of the sourcing process.
- For different categories of spend, Smiths Detection applies single, dual, multiple, or sole sourcing process.
- Drawing from the pros and cons of the different sourcing methods, it is apparent that there is no unique and universal approach for Smiths Detection sourcing.
- Rather, the approaches are unique to the categories of spend.
- Drawing from the Carter’s 10 Cs appraisal model, it is essential for Smiths Detection to examine the various aspects of the potential suppliers for informed decision-making process.