(Solution) 5C003 New (AC1.4) Recognise when and how you would raise matters which conflict with ethical values or legislation
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
Original price was: £ 20.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Solution
Unethical Behavior in the Workplace
An example of unethical behavior could involve favoritism in recruitment. A hiring manager might deliberately favor a friend or relative for a position despite other candidates being better qualified. This not only breaches fairness but also undermines merit-based hiring (MSPB, 2024). It violates the ethical principle of fairness and impartiality in the recruitment process. Such actions could lead to resentment among employees and lower morale, as the decision is driven by personal interests rather than the organization’s best interests.
If I observed this unethical behavior, I would first gather concrete evidence, such as emails or records of interviews, to support my concern. I would raise the matter to my line manager through a confidential meeting, following the organization’s whistleblowing policy. This approach ensures that the issue is addressed appropriately while protecting my identity. If the manager fails to act, I would escalate the concern to the HR department or another relevant authority, ensuring that my actions align with the organization’s code of ethics.
Contravention of UK Legislation
An example of contravening UK legislation is failing to provide employees with the minimum wage as mandated by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (GOV.UK, 2024). Suppose I discover that certain employees are being paid below the minimum wage, which directly violates the law. This issue could lead to legal repercussions for the organisation and cause significant hardship for the affected employees.
In such a case, I would address the issue by first reviewing payroll records and documenting any discrepancies to ensure clarity. I would then approach my manager and explain how this violates the National Minimum Wage Act. If the issue is not resolved promptly, I would escalate it to HR or the legal department, following the company’s grievance procedure. Should internal mechanisms fail, I would report the matter to external authorities like the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS), ensuring full compliance with legal obligations (ACAS, 2023).
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) FINM036 Financial Decision Making
(Solution) 7CO03 Learning Journal Impact of collaboration across cultural, geographic and professional boundaries, including the value of embracing difference
(Solution) 7C001 Question 13: Purpose of Values Based Recruitment
(Solution) CIPS Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply RCU PDC
- This report has focused on evaluating Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU) contract terms and conditions.
- The area of focus in the contract entail its relevance in assisting the management of issues associated with quality, risk of time extension, risk of costs increase and unethical practices impacting the stakeholders.
- Other than this, the performance measures and management in the organisation operations has been put into account.
- For achieving this, RCU operating in the KSA tourism and culture sector has put into account.
- The contract selected is used in most of the services which are sourced by the organisation from different suppliers. This is to define the level of risk and power that each has in the contract implementation.
- Despite of existence of areas of improvement, clauses lacking detail and lack of sufficient protection, the contract terms and conditions are relevant for RCU operations.
- For all the parties and stakeholders involved in a contract implementation, there is a clear risk allocation and management. This is with the performance being measured and monitored based on their interests.
- There is a need for investing in modernised approaches intended to protect the organisation from the battle of the forms.
(Solution) CIPS Assessment 3 PSE Sourcing Essentials
- In summary, sourcing approaches has been evaluated in this assessment. This is through the focus of ADNOC organisation spend category.
- The selected spend category is IT for their advancement of remote and flexible working post-COVID-19 pandemic. Also, by comparing this with other different spend categories, the sourcing approaches evaluated included sole, multiple, single and dual sourcing.
- Through the application of different CIPS tools and techniques Kraljic analysis, Stakeholders analysis, SWOT and PESTLE analysis, a successful evaluation has been put into active process. This is with the best practice in ADNOC being identified and prioritised.
- Further, for the successful sourcing of ADNOC IT system, a successful suppliers appraisal process has been pursued.
- This has been done through the application of Cater’s 10C’s Model. As part of this analysis, the best supplier has been noted and involved.
(Solution) New CIPS Corporate Award Advanced Practitioner (CAAP) Project proposal
- Improved engagement of different stakeholders in tendering process of contracts process
- Increased costs savings by reducing communication barriers and also reducing the number of employees working in tendering process
- An effective data management and recording for ensuring success in evaluation and use of the data for contracts tendering process metrics
- Effective management of issues in the contracts evaluation and recommend best strategies in their mitigation during tendering process
- To effectively pursue trend analysis to understand the history of evaluations and effectively use the data in managing tendering process