-80%
Payment Link
New User Gifts
First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.
KaribuCustomer
Original price was: £ 100.00.£ 20.00Current price is: £ 20.00.
Payment Methods:
Description
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS Oman LNG LLC Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award (APCE)
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
- In this assessment, by selecting Oman Liquefied Natural Gas LLC (Oman LNG), contractual terms for identifying the distribution of power and risk between the supplier and the organisation has been pursued.
- In the different areas which have been focused on for evaluation making the contract, it is evident that there are areas where risk and power is distributed to either party.
- There is no dominant stakeholders assuming exclusive risk or power of the contract.
- Further, the findings in this assessment has identified the distribution of risks and power in the contract as being informed by the scale, diversified level and core feature of the contract implementation.
(Solution) (AC4.1) Assess suitable types of contractual arrangements dependent on specific workforce need
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
Solution Permanent, full-time contracts Permanent, full-time contracts for delivery drivers offer both benefits and drawbacks, making their suitability dependent on ParcelCare’s operational needs and goals. Pros Permanent, full-time contracts provide job security and consistent income for delivery drivers, enhancing employee satisfaction and loyalty. This stability can lead to higher motivation and productivity, reducing turnover rates and the associated costs of recruitment and training as evidenced by Personio (2023). Full-time contracts also facilitate better workforce planning, ensuring ParcelCare has reliable staffing to meet delivery demands. Cons However, these contracts can be less flexible and more costly for the company. Full-time employees typically require benefits such as health insurance, paid leave, and retirement plans, increasing operational expenses. Additionally, the rigidity of permanent contracts may not align with fluctuating delivery volumes, leading to inefficiencies during low-demand periods. Suitability For ParcelCare, full-time contracts can be suitable if delivery volumes are consistently high, ensuring a stable workforce. However, a mixed model that includes part-time or flexible contracts might offer the necessary flexibility to adapt to changing demands while controlling costs. Part-Time Contracts Part-time contracts offer flexibility for delivery drivers, allowing them to balance work with other commitments. Drivers benefit from a stable income, albeit at reduced hours, while ParcelCare can adjust staffing levels according to demand. A significant advantage of part-time contracts is reduced costs associated with employee benefits, as part-time workers may not qualify for full benefits packages (Abogados, 2019). However, part-time drivers may lack the same commitment or availability as full-time employees, potentially impacting reliability and consistency. Zero-Hours Contracts Zero-hours contracts provide maximum flexibility, allowing ParcelCare to scale staffing up or down based on delivery demand without a fixed commitment to provide hours (CIPD, 2023c). For drivers, these contracts offer freedom to accept or decline work, appealing to those seeking flexibility. However, they also result in income uncertainty and lack of guaranteed hours, which can be challenging for drivers seeking stability. For ParcelCare, zero-hours contracts minimise costs during low-demand periods but may lead to difficulties in maintaining a loyal and consistent workforce due to potential driver dissatisfaction. Part-time contracts are most suitable for ParcelCare’s delivery drivers. They offer a stable income and consistent work schedule, which can enhance job satisfaction and reliability while allowing ParcelCare to adjust staffing levels as needed. This balance supports both operational needs and employee stability. Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Solution) 7C002 Question 15 (AC4.3) Insights from customers and stakeholders
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) 7C002 Question 1 (AC1.1)
Original price was: £ 30.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
(Solution) CIPS New APCE Advanced Category Management
Original price was: £ 50.00.£ 10.00Current price is: £ 10.00.
- In summary, this assignment has focused on evaluating the source of power and risk of an organisation contractual terms. This has been conducted through the focus of SSMC organisation which is currently being engaged in procurement of first aid materials.
- Through a series of analysis, the power and risk distribution has been evidenced as varying in different phenomenon to SSMC and their engaged suppliers. The rationale of this is that for the success of a contract, the legal provisions are critical among the involved parties with clearly set requirements to be adhered to or abstained.
- By using different tools including supplier preferencing matrix, Porter’s 5 forces and Turn-key model have been adopted for this research.
- It has been established that in most instances, SSMC has the power with majority of the risks being held by the supplier. An evaluation of the different components of the contract has been conducted with the clauses of interest including costs, quality level, time for delivery and ethics which influence the power and risk of the suppliers.
- From the analysis of stakeholders by use of the Mendelow stakeholder’s matrix and SWOT analysis, the various issues and risks represent the noted issues in procurement of the fast aid and safety measures in today COVID-19 pandemic.
- As evidenced in the Kraljic analysis, various contract terms are of strategic relevance to SSMC which affirm on its approach of holistically leveraging on contractual risk and power.
- Where the SSMC lacks a holistic balance on the risks and power, a warrant or insurance is granted for guaranteeing their safety.