Description
Solution
Question 1 (AC 1.1) Provide an overview of the three main perspectives on employment relations, unitarist, pluralist and radical, explaining which approach is adopted at your organisation, critically evaluating how this influences the work of its people professionals.
Main Perspectives on Employment Relations
Unitarist Perspective
According to the unitarist perspective, the organisation is portrayed as one whole body with common goals among the employees and the employers, emphasising cooperation and loyalty (Kaufman et al., 2020). Under this approach, conflict is seen as unnecessary, resulting from poor communication or individual misunderstanding rather than inherent differences in interests. Saudi Aramco embraces a unitarist model, illustrated by the company’s culture of alignment between employees and management, where particular communication channels are structured, employees are extensively trained, and the career progression paths are clear (Aramco, 2025).
This approach has proven effective for Saudi Aramco due to its focus in collaboration and shared corporate objectives. The organisation places an emphasis on leadership development and workforce engagement initiatives like mentorship programs and internal mobility schemes, that contribute to a strong feeling of belonging (Aramco, 2025). The company also makes use of suggestion systems and performance-based incentives to actively encourage direct employee participation that lowers the likelihood of adversarial employment relations. However, while this approach promote unity, it can also restrict the opportunity for open discussions about any workplace grievances (Rogers, 2023). This may constrain employees from voicing dissenting opinions which can lead to unresolved tensions that can eventually lead to disengagement or high turnover among the employees.
By acting as intermediaries, people professionals maintain this balance by ensuring that communication is transparent and inclusive. The challenge, however, is to deal with the underlying issues without compromising the corporate narrative of unity (Van Buren III, 2021). This approach would be more effective if mechanisms for anonymous feedback were enhanced and structured forums for discussing employment concerns were created. The unitarist model clearly empowers a strong corporate identity, however, its effectiveness depends on creating the space for constructive dialogue while allowing for employees’ voices to not only be heard, but also effectively acted upon.
Pluralist Perspective
The pluralist perspective recognises that organisations have different groups of individuals with varying, and in some cases, conflicting interests. This assumes that structured conflict is normal and can be managed through collective bargaining and effective representation (Hill et al., 2021). This approach is demonstrated partially at Saudi Aramco, especially in industrial relations and the company’s engagement with workers’ committees, which are established to deal with employee concerns formally.
Saudi Aramco encourages workforce diversity and accommodates different views through the presence of structured dispute resolution mechanisms and employee representation bodies (Caniglia et al., 2020). This model works well for the organisation because of how employment relations are managed through mediation, formal grievance processes and structured career pathways that are fair. Saudi Aramco mitigates disputes and maintains operational stability by allowing employee representation within structured channels. Its effectiveness is somewhat limited, however, because it operates in the absence of formal trade union structures, due to Saudi laws that prohibit unionisation. This is a limitation as there are mechanisms to address grievances, but employee advocacy may not be as robust as a fully pluralist environment (Araújo, 2020).
At Saudi Aramco, the pluralist approach means that for people professionals they must possess strong negotiation and…..
Please click the following icon to access this project in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS ADNOC Module: Global Strategic Supply Chain Management APGSS
- Invest in collaboration, networking and technology for sustainable supply chain
- Improving supply chain development by providing capacity development for PS&M teams
- Holistic inclusion of stakeholders in conflicts management
- To include all tiers of supply chain for success in globalisation to manage all risks and performance challenges
(Solution) CIPS APCM – Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award
(Solution) New CIPD 2024 5HR01- Employment Relationship Management
(Solution) CIPD 5HR02 (AC3.1) Discuss factors that influence why people choose to leave or remain in organisations.
(Solution) CIPS Module: Global Strategic Supply Chain Management
- In this assessment, the focus has been on evaluating global strategic approach for WoodPlc supply chain identified. The relevance of this is informed by assumption that supply chain is anchored on the need to influence changes in market in supply chain practices. This is while sustainable global sourcing strategies being used.
- The findings evidence strategic logistical impact of an organisation and supply chain management process has an impact on corporate performance. The different tools and techniques which have been applied inform on the best practice of the organisation operations.
- For WoodPlc organisation working in oil and gas contracting sector in UAE, reviewing of their supply chain is used by use of best practice in their practice. Also, an identification of entire risks, issues incurred and opportunities evident.
- The findings in this report evidence different challenges as affecting collaboration. This assessment recommend need for Improving collaboration, network-based practice and innovativeness to ensure they embrace sustainability in supply chain
- Today, WoodPlc has been identified as lacking appropriate continuous development strategy for all stakeholders and end-users of their operations. Improving supply chain development through an increased chances for learning
- In WoodPlc, they are encountering immense transitioning from modern supply chain and use of technologies. There is a need to manage all the supply chain relations. This is for the Conflicts management in entire supply chain relations to ensure stakeholders are involved and part of the implementation of the practice
- In this report, it has been concluded on the existing challenges in their tiers. To manage the challenges identified from the Porters 5 forces analysis, there is a need to introduce end-to-end supply chain for their overall demands which capture various tiers for including all operations. This is to guarantee a successful management of the overall supply chain and performance management issues