-50%
Awaiting product image
Click to enlarge

(Solution) 5C003 personal and ethical values (one of each), with examples of how these are evident in your work (AC 1.2)

New User Gifts

First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.

KaribuCustomer

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.

Payment Methods:

Description

Solution

One of my core personal values is empathy. I believe that understanding and sharing the feelings of others is crucial in creating a supportive and collaborative work environment. In my role as a people professional, I consistently apply empathy by actively listening to colleagues and employees, ensuring that their concerns are heard and addressed with genuine care. For example, when a team member expressed feelings of burnout, I took the time to understand their challenges and worked with them to create a more manageable workload. According to Jonsdottir and Kristinsson (2020), this approach not only helped the employee feel valued and supported but also contributed to a more positive and productive work environment.

On the ethical side, fairness is a value that I hold in high regard. I believe that everyone should be treated equitably, with equal opportunities for growth and development, regardless of their background or circumstances. In my work, I apply this ethical value by ensuring that all HR processes, such as recruitment, promotions, and performance appraisals, are conducted transparently and without bias. For instance, during a recent recruitment process, I implemented a blind screening method to evaluate candidates solely on their skills and qualifications, removing any potential biases related to gender, ethnicity, or other personal characteristics. This practice ensures that the most qualified candidate was selected based on merit, reinforcing the principles of fairness and equality within the organisation (Vivek, 2022).

These values of empathy and fairness guide my actions and decisions in my people practice work, helping me to create an inclusive and supportive workplace where everyone can thrive. By consistently applying these values, I contribute to a positive organisational culture that values diversity, promotes well-being, and upholds ethical standards.

Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full

Related Papers

-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) 5OS06 (AC3.2) Evaluate the extent and nature of the methods used by your own organisation

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution Leadership and Management Development Initiative The Global Leadership Excellence Program (GLEP) is one of the key leadership and management
-67%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPD Assessment ID/CIPD_5OS07_23_01 Wellbeing at work

Original price was: £ 30.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution INSERT YOUR ANSWER IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW. Table of Content AC 1.1 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 AC 1.2 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………10 AC 1.3
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPS ADNOC APGCM strategic and conventional sourcing processes and their role in category management

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution The comparison of strategic and conventional sourcing in the context of ADNOC reveals significant differences in the approaches and
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) Sourcing essentials (PSE) Facilities management category

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
This report evaluates and compares four key sourcing approaches: sole, single, dual, and multiple sourcing, within ROSHN, focusing on facilities management as the primary category of spend. Facilities management is chosen due to its critical role in maintaining ROSHN’s large-scale residential projects and ensuring operational efficiency. Each sourcing approach is analysed for its advantages and disadvantages, and its applicability to specific procurement needs is explored using strategic tools like the Kraljic matrix and supplier preferencing models. For instance, sole sourcing is applied to specialised maintenance services, while single sourcing is used for cleaning services due to quality control needs. Dual sourcing is chosen for security services to mitigate risks, and multiple sourcing is recommended for office supplies within facilities management to foster competition and innovation. A detailed supplier appraisal checklist for the facilities management category is developed using Carter’s 10 C’s model to ensure a thorough evaluation of supplier capabilities. This checklist ensures that ROSHN selects suppliers who meet stringent quality, reliability, and cost-effectiveness criteria. The findings highlight the importance of strategic sourcing in maintaining ROSHN’s competitive advantage in the Saudi Arabian real estate market. The following recommendations aim to optimise ROSHN’s procurement processes, ensuring efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and resilience in its supply chain:
  • Conduct thorough market research using tools like Porter’s Five Forces and PESTLE analysis to understand the supplier landscape and market dynamics better.
  • Integrate advanced eSourcing tools, including ERP systems and eAuctions, to streamline procurement processes and increase efficiency.
  • Adopt dual and multiple sourcing strategies to mitigate risks, enhance competition, and ensure supply continuity for critical categories.
  • Develop and maintain strong supplier relationships through continuous performance evaluations, clear communication, and strategic partnerships.
  • Provide training and development opportunities focused on strategic sourcing, negotiation skills, and advanced procurement technologies.
 
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPD Level 5 5C002 Evidence Based Practice Technivara

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
Solution TASK 1: 2845 words 1.1 Evidence-Based Practice in Technivara Definition of Evidence-Based Practice The implementation of Evidence-Based Practise in
-50%
Placeholder

(Solution) CIPS New Saudi Aramco Driving Value Through Procurement & Supply; Managing Expenditures with Suppliers

Original price was: £ 20.00.Current price is: £ 10.00.
Add to cart
In this first project in Corporate Award Program, the focus has been on role of procurement supply and management (PS&M) responsibility in achieving value for money outcomes. This is through the focus on Saudi Aramco third party logistics spend category. Also, a review on the current approaches to management of prices and costs for the third party logistics spend category has been identified. This is by using different data and information from contracts management,  procurement, commercial-driven development, strategic sourcing and PS&M practices. Also, different models have been used including Mendelow, Kraljic matrix, Porter’s 5 forces, STEEPLED and Suppliers Preferencing model. The key findings obtained in this project include the view that Saudi Aramco engage multiple stakeholders for successful practice. Also, the key findings evidence their market environment as competitive hence success in achieving value for money outcomes. The organisation strategy of achieving value for money outcomes has similarly been identified. This is with its pros and cons enhancing or limiting a successful implementation established. From the findings and conclusions, various recommendations have been generated which include;
  • An in-depth evaluation of positioning of all stakeholders for accommodating their interests in their operations
  • In third party logistics, they can involve multiple sourcing to be competitive hence value for money
  • To involve different specialists for gaining awareness on improving value for money
  • Review of budget in sourcing third party logistics with technology involved in sourcing process.