Description
Solution
Table 2 Data: Line Managers and Employees’ Feedback
| Response | Strongly Agree (50 Responses) | Agree (50 Responses) | Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (50 Responses) | Strongly Agree (235 Responses) | Agree (235 Responses) | Disagree (235 Responses) | Strongly Disagree (235 Responses) | |
| A | 6.00% | 58.00% | 22.00% | 14.00% | 0.85% | 47.23% | 51.49% | 0.43% | |
| B | 8.00% | 44.00% | 46.00% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 16.60% | 79.57% | 1.70% | |
| C | 14.00% | 58.00% | 18.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 60.00% | 34.89% | 2.55% | |
| D | 6.00% | 52.00% | 22.00% | 20.00% | 6.38% | 42.13% | 37.87% | 13.62% | |
| E | 0.00% | 0.00% | 88.00% | 12.00% | 34.74% | 33.62% | 6.38% | 4.26% | |
| F | 0.00% | 18.00% | 74.00% | 8.00% | 0.00% | 60.84% | 39.15% | 0.00% | |
| G | 24.00% | 8.00% | 30.00% | 38.00% | 29.36% | 27.66% | 23.83% | 19.15% | |
| H | 24% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 22.98% | 42.98% | 29.79% | 4.26% |
Table 2 identified patterns, themes and trends
Line managers
For line managers (50 responses), items C and G show stronger agreement, indicating higher levels of support or alignment with certain practices. In contrast, items E and F show significant disagreement, suggesting that some practices may not be perceived as beneficial or effective by line managers.
Employees
Employees (235 responses) exhibit different trends. For example, item E has a high “Strongly Agree” rate, indicating support among employees, while line managers largely disagreed. This suggests a disconnect between employee perceptions and managerial views.
Items A and B show stronger disagreement from employees than from line managers, hinting at employee dissatisfaction with certain aspects of management.
The benefits include:
While most managers felt secure in their abilities to assign ratings without interference or criticism, employees were only moderately on board.
Table 1 -3 Diagrammatic Representations
Pie Chart: Performance of Administration Department in Quarter 2
Pie Chart shows the performance distribution for the Administration Department in Quarter 2, with 10% of reviews marked as “Outstanding,” 40% as “Meets KPIs,” another 40% as “Not Quite There,” and 10% as “Underperforming.” This indicates a relatively balanced performance with room for improvement across different performance levels
Column Chart: Outstanding Performance by Department and Quarter
Compares the percentage of “Outstanding” performance by department across Quarter 1 and Quarter 2. Sales had 100% outstanding in Quarter 1, while R&D saw a significant increase in Quarter 2.
Horizontal Bar Chart: Underperforming Performance by Department and Quarter
Represents the “Underperforming” percentages by department across the two quarters. The Administration Department showed a reduction from 30% in Quarter 1 to 10% in Quarter 2, while Sales consistently had no underperforming scores.
Table 1 Recommendations
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) CIPS TAQA Water Solutions Sourcing Essentials (PSE)
(Solution) 7CO03 Learning Journal Impact of collaboration across cultural, geographic and professional boundaries, including the value of embracing difference
(Solution) CIPD 5HR02 (AC3.1) Discuss factors that influence why people choose to leave or remain in organisations.
(Solution) CIPD Level 5 5HR03- Reward for Performance and Contribution
(Solution) CIPD Explain the selection records that need to be retained. (AC2.4)
(Solution) CIPS Advanced level Leadership & Management in Procurement and Supply
- In summary, this report has focused on evaluating the impact of approaches to leadership and management in an organisation.
- To achieve this, a focus on Eco2Solar organisation has been prioritised where it has been established that the organisation current success in a project intended to achieve 2,000 installation in different apartments can be credited to their astute leadership and management.
- This equally evidence the organisation position dominating UK solar sector.
- These findings have been affirmed by PESTLE analysis of external factors, RACI Matrix among other tools which have been used.
