Description
Solution
| Explain different methods of performance review. (AC4.3) If you use secondary sources you should include your short references in the narrative here. Wordcount: Approximately 250 words. |
| Self-Assessment
This is identified in LinkedIn (2023a), this include a process of the employees assessing individual performance and achievements with zero input of the others. The major features are employees reflecting on and rating themselves using pre-noted criteria which include meetings focus, competency and behaviours. For disadvantages, using it in Clean Quarter would lead to lack of objectivity since external validation lack. 360-Degree Feedback This is a process pursued in collection of anonymous feedback on employees performance from supervisory teams, reporting directly, peers and in some cases their customers or external stakeholders. The main features include provision of multi-ratter assessment process from various perspectives concerning an employee performance (Prevue Hr, 2021). Besides, the method uses immense time in administering and likely fail in terms of consistency in standards of the ratters which can be used in Clean Quarter. Annual Reviews This is identified to include formal-based meeting by the employee and their supervisors in an event their performance over the past year is assessed against set objectives and competencies (CIPD, 2022b). The method include a summative assessment for rating the performance, offering formal feedback, discussion of development demands and setting goals for next working period. For their disadvantage, using it in Clean Quarter, delays upto the time in the year done could mean failure to consider multiple occurrences which occurred outside the timeline.
|
| Explain the key components of an effective total reward system. (AC5.1)If you use secondary sources you should include your short references in the narrative here. Wordcount: Approximately 250 words. |
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 7HR02 Question 1 External and Internal Factors Shaping Organisation’s Resourcing and Talent Strategy
(Solution) CIPS Occidental of Oman Commercial Management Assessment
(Solution) University of Northampton Marketing Audit
(Solution) 5C003 Role of people professional evolving; priorities
(Solution) CIPS Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply RCU PDC
- This report has focused on evaluating Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU) contract terms and conditions.
- The area of focus in the contract entail its relevance in assisting the management of issues associated with quality, risk of time extension, risk of costs increase and unethical practices impacting the stakeholders.
- Other than this, the performance measures and management in the organisation operations has been put into account.
- For achieving this, RCU operating in the KSA tourism and culture sector has put into account.
- The contract selected is used in most of the services which are sourced by the organisation from different suppliers. This is to define the level of risk and power that each has in the contract implementation.
- Despite of existence of areas of improvement, clauses lacking detail and lack of sufficient protection, the contract terms and conditions are relevant for RCU operations.
- For all the parties and stakeholders involved in a contract implementation, there is a clear risk allocation and management. This is with the performance being measured and monitored based on their interests.
- There is a need for investing in modernised approaches intended to protect the organisation from the battle of the forms.
