Description
Solution
| Assess different approaches to performance management. (AC 3.1)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section.Word count: Approximately 400words
|
| The procedure for overseeing employee performance and enhancing work inside the organization is known as performance management (Armstrong, 2021). Together, HR professionals and employees plan, monitor, and evaluate each person’s job goals and contribution to the firm.
Planning phase Together, staff members and managers assess each other’s job descriptions, examine how they relate to organizational goals, and establish a plan for the completion of deliverables. Also agreed upon are SMART performance objectives. Coaching Phase- Employees receive coaching to address complaints about their performance as well as feedback on their areas for development. Review Phase- Performance evaluations, summaries, and rewards are given to employees. 360-degree feedback- This method entails gathering information about performance in the manner of feedback from a variety of stakeholders, including coworkers, managers, and supervisors who evaluate a person’s performance based on a variety of behaviors or characteristics (Peng & Zeng, 2017). The development reports that are produced as a result of the participant input support performance improvement. Its benefit is that it helps people become self-aware of their talents and limitations, which inspire them to pursue personal development. The development of workplace ties is another benefit. Peer feedback aids in the development of connections and trust. When managers focus on the negativeside and ignore the positive side, it has the disadvantage of obscuring positive input. When people provide feedback that the boss wants to hear, it could potentially result in dishonest appraisals (Maulidi, 2020). Performance review Meetings SHRM (2018) define review meetings as “formal conversations intended to produce results that can help employees better their work efficiency and help organizations achieve goals and objectives.” During these meetings, the performance management planning stage goals are reviewed. Managers evaluate if goals have been met and provide helpful criticism. The manager and employee relationships are good, which is to its advantage. Direct lines of dialogue help to strengthen relationships. Its drawback is that it takes a lot of time. Review meetings can take a lot of time to hold, which delays organizational projects. Continuous Professional Development (CPD) Through both formal and informal operations, there is ongoing learning that is reflected upon and recorded in an individual growth strategy. By encouraging staff members to participate in both formal and informal instruction to advance skill and knowledge growth, it can be utilized to manage performance (Shonhe, 2020). When people use what they have learned in the job, it has the advantage of enhancing individual performance. Additionally, it improves skill sets that enable people to remain contemporary and creative. Its drawback is a lack of motivation and time to learn while working. High expenses, particularly for formal education, are a problem for CPDs.
|
| Review the role of people practice in supporting line managers to make consistent and appropriate reward judgements. (AC 3.2)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section.Word count: Approximately 300 words
|
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full
Related Papers
(Solution) 5OS06 (AC3.2) Evaluate the extent and nature of the methods used by your own organisation
(Solution) CIPD MCIPD Experience Assessment Knowledge and Impact Report
(Solution) CIPD New 5HR03: Reward for Performance Contribution
(Solution) CIPS Oman LNG LLC Advanced Practitioner Corporate Award (APCE)
- In this assessment, by selecting Oman Liquefied Natural Gas LLC (Oman LNG), contractual terms for identifying the distribution of power and risk between the supplier and the organisation has been pursued.
- In the different areas which have been focused on for evaluation making the contract, it is evident that there are areas where risk and power is distributed to either party.
- There is no dominant stakeholders assuming exclusive risk or power of the contract.
- Further, the findings in this assessment has identified the distribution of risks and power in the contract as being informed by the scale, diversified level and core feature of the contract implementation.
